Follow us on social

google cta
Gaza ceasefire hanging by a thread

Gaza ceasefire hanging by a thread

Repeated violations of Monday’s agreement could provoke a return to war

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The ceasefire agreement in Gaza is hanging by a thread as both Israel and Hamas face allegations of violating the terms of the deal, which went into force on Monday.

Israel claims that Hamas has been dragging its feet on returning the remains of deceased hostages. So far, the Palestinian armed group has only managed to deliver the bodies of nine of the remaining 28 deceased hostages.

Hamas claims that it is moving as quickly as it can given the difficulties of finding bodies that may be buried under rubble or hidden deep in bombed-out tunnels. But that hasn’t stopped Israel from threatening to “resume fighting and act to achieve a total defeat of Hamas.”

Israel announced that it is scaling back its own compliance with the ceasefire in what it says is a response to violations by Hamas. Perhaps most consequentially, Israel is now dramatically reducing the amount of aid that it will allow to enter the strip, dropping the total number of permitted daily truckloads from 600 — the amount aid officials say is needed to help alleviate famine — to 300.

Israel claims that this reduced number of trucks will carry only humanitarian aid. But Al Jazeera reported Thursday that many of the shipments have contained commercial products, which are unaffordable for the vast majority of Gazans. Meanwhile, Israel has continued to carry out attacks within Gaza, killing at least nine Palestinians who allegedly got too close to Israeli military facilities in the strip.

U.S. officials have sought to play down these early challenges, with one senior adviser to President Donald Trump telling reporters that Hamas is honoring the deal, citing as evidence the return of all living hostages on Monday. But it remains unclear whether the U.S. will be able to keep up enough pressure on both sides to force a lasting peace.

Further complicating affairs have been images of Hamas cracking down on armed gangs that have grown in power — sometimes with explicit Israeli help — since the war began. In recent days, videos have circulated on social media showing Hamas carrying out field executions of gang members, sparking no small amount of unease among Western leaders.

The startling images highlight a key weakness of the deal: it initiated a partial Israeli withdrawal without first establishing some form of temporary government or peacekeeping force to manage the transition. Trump is now attempting to fill that gap by recruiting potential peacekeepers, with reports saying that Indonesia, Azerbaijan and Pakistan are interested in sending soldiers to support the effort.

But, even with a peacekeeping operation in place, significant questions remain about how to protect the deal. Hamas has agreed to hand over its heavy weapons, but only to an Arab or Palestinian governing body. And it has not accepted the idea of surrendering its light weapons, which could turn into a significant sticking point with Israel.

It’s not all bad news, of course. Egypt announced Tuesday that all sides had reached agreement on a board of 15 Palestinian technocrats who could manage the post-war transition in Gaza. And Egypt’s foreign minister said Hamas is “committed” to having “no role” in the transition. But the names of the technocrats are yet to be revealed, and the path to handing over power remains fraught at best.

The primary question now is whether Trump is willing to keep up the pressure on Israel in order to force it to accept a lasting peace — a situation that may well end with Hamas maintaining a certain degree of power in Gaza. One worrying sign on this front came Tuesday, when Trump threatened to restart the war if Hamas failed to turn over all of its weapons.

“They will disarm or we will disarm them,” he told reporters. “Got it?”


Top image credit: Displaced Palestinians ordered by the Israeli military to evacuate their neighborhoods make their way as they flee amid an Israeli military operation, in Beit Lahiya in the northern Gaza Strip October 22, 2024. REUTERS/Stringer
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
Despite ban, pernicious military 'earmarks' are back in the billions
Top image credit: Roman Samborski via shutterstock.com
Popular YouTuber discovers how corrupt the Pentagon budget is

Despite ban, pernicious military 'earmarks' are back in the billions

Military Industrial Complex

A new report finds that lawmakers added nearly $34 billion to the Pentagon’s procurement and research accounts for FY2026, through 1,090 individual program increases, many of which the Defense Department did not even request funds for.

Although individual program increases are not earmarks, they serve a similar function. Formal earmarks themselves were temporarily banned in 2011 to curb lawmaker-driven runaway spending, then reintroduced in 2021 by Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) as “Community Project Funding,” and “Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS)” in the House and Senate respectively — and subject to transparency requirements, where lawmakers must associate themselves with the earmarks they propose.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.