Follow us on social

google cta
Congress-scaled

The govt reopens — with $850 million bonus for military toys!

Lawmakers made sure to give extra padding for the controversial Sentinel nuke, B-21 bomber programs without batting an eye

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

In reopening the government Wednesday, lawmakers put more than $850 million toward notoriously wasteful military spending projects — the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) nuclear weapons program and the prospective B-21 Raider, a bomber.

As Defense One reported today, funds included in the legislation signed by the president will go towards myriad projects supporting these systems’ development and basing. This includes bomber shelters and hangars for the B-21, and a simulator. About $130 million will fund work on a utility corridor for Sentinel.

But $850 million is a lot of money to put toward projects frequently challenged for their excessive price tags, and questionable pay-off.

Defense manufacturer Northrop Grumman, which makes the B-21, has hyped the bomber as the “future of deterrence.” But slated to cost over $200 billion, that program continues to suffer from ballooning manufacturing costs — even as critics say it offers little more to the Air Force than its predecessor, the B-2 bomber currently in service. Here, the B-21’s purported stealth has been a key selling point, but that technology did not pan out for other endeavors, including the F-22 and F-35 programs, which also used stealth as a selling point.

Even as it runs more than 80% over-budget, arms control experts increasingly say that the bloated Sentinel program, which would replace the Minuteman as the land-based leg of the U.S. nuclear triad, is no longer necessary for nuclear deterrence. They say it may actually harm national security, encouraging an adversarial attack, rather than deter it.

"Lavishing more money on the B-21 and Sentinel programs when they have been plagued with cost overruns rooted in unrealistic planning is precisely the wrong way to use our tax dollars," William Hartung, Senior Research Fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told RS. "The only beneficiaries of this haphazard process are the weapons contractors that are profiting from the development of a new generation of nuclear weapons."

Before the shutdown, lawmakers already padded House and Senate versions of the FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), with $400 million and $2 billion respectively. That bill is currently in conference.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Top Image Credit: U.S. Congress. (Shutterstock/Mark Reinstein)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump
Top image credit: President Donald Trump addresses the nation, Wednesday, December 17, 2025, from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump national security logic: rare earths and fossil fuels

Washington Politics

The new National Security Strategy of the United States seeks “strategic stability” with Russia. It declares that China is merely a competitor, that the Middle East is not central to American security, that Latin America is “our hemisphere,” and that Europe faces “civilizational erasure.”

India, the world's largest country by population, barely rates a mention — one might say, as Neville Chamberlain did of Czechoslovakia in 1938, it’s “a faraway country... of which we know nothing.” Well, so much the better for India, which can take care of itself.

keep readingShow less
Experts at oil & weapons-funded think tank: 'Go big' in Venezuela
Top image credit: LightField Studios via shutterstock.com

Experts at oil & weapons-funded think tank: 'Go big' in Venezuela

Military Industrial Complex

As the U.S. threatens to take “oil, land and other assets” from Venezuela, staffers at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank funded in part by defense contractors and oil companies, are eager to help make the public case for regime change and investment. “The U.S. should go big” in Venezuela, write CSIS experts Ryan Berg and Kimberly Breier.

Both America’s Quarterly, which published the essay, and the authors’ employer happen to be funded by the likes of Lockheed Martin and ExxonMobil, a fact that is not disclosed in the article.

keep readingShow less
ukraine military
UKRAINE MARCH 22, 2023: Ukrainian military practice assault tactics at the training ground before counteroffensive operation during Russo-Ukrainian War (Shutterstock/Dymtro Larin)

Ukraine's own pragmatism demands 'armed un-alignment'

Europe

Eleven months after returning to the White House, the Trump administration believes it has finally found a way to resolve the four-year old war in Ukraine. Its formula is seemingly simple: land for security guarantees.

Under the current plan—or what is publicly known about it—Ukraine would cede the 20 percent of Donetsk that it currently controls to Russia in return for a package of security guarantees including an “Article 5-style” commitment from the United States, a European “reassurance force” inside post-war Ukraine, and peacetime Ukrainian military of 800,000 personnel.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.