Follow us on social

google cta
Congress-scaled

The govt reopens — with $850 million bonus for military toys!

Lawmakers made sure to give extra padding for the controversial Sentinel nuke, B-21 bomber programs without batting an eye

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

In reopening the government Wednesday, lawmakers put more than $850 million toward notoriously wasteful military spending projects — the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) nuclear weapons program and the prospective B-21 Raider, a bomber.

As Defense One reported today, funds included in the legislation signed by the president will go towards myriad projects supporting these systems’ development and basing. This includes bomber shelters and hangars for the B-21, and a simulator. About $130 million will fund work on a utility corridor for Sentinel.

But $850 million is a lot of money to put toward projects frequently challenged for their excessive price tags, and questionable pay-off.

Defense manufacturer Northrop Grumman, which makes the B-21, has hyped the bomber as the “future of deterrence.” But slated to cost over $200 billion, that program continues to suffer from ballooning manufacturing costs — even as critics say it offers little more to the Air Force than its predecessor, the B-2 bomber currently in service. Here, the B-21’s purported stealth has been a key selling point, but that technology did not pan out for other endeavors, including the F-22 and F-35 programs, which also used stealth as a selling point.

Even as it runs more than 80% over-budget, arms control experts increasingly say that the bloated Sentinel program, which would replace the Minuteman as the land-based leg of the U.S. nuclear triad, is no longer necessary for nuclear deterrence. They say it may actually harm national security, encouraging an adversarial attack, rather than deter it.

"Lavishing more money on the B-21 and Sentinel programs when they have been plagued with cost overruns rooted in unrealistic planning is precisely the wrong way to use our tax dollars," William Hartung, Senior Research Fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told RS. "The only beneficiaries of this haphazard process are the weapons contractors that are profiting from the development of a new generation of nuclear weapons."

Before the shutdown, lawmakers already padded House and Senate versions of the FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), with $400 million and $2 billion respectively. That bill is currently in conference.


Top Image Credit: U.S. Congress. (Shutterstock/Mark Reinstein)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
South Africa: Between Iran and a hard place (Donald Trump)
Top photo credit: President Cyril Ramaphosa (Photo: GCIS/Flickr) and Donald Trump (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

South Africa: Between Iran and a hard place (Donald Trump)

Africa

South Africa is struggling to unfurl its wings as a leading middle power and advance its relations with its fellow BRICS members while keeping out of the cross hairs of the U.S. president. This has been particularly hard considering that one member of the Global South grouping — Iran — is on Donald Trump’s current list of potential military targets.

South Africa joined BRICS in 2006. The organization is supposed to serve as an intergovernmental forum for member countries to connect on issues related to diplomacy, security, and economics. But the bloc has angered President Trump, who sees it as a threat to American leadership, particularly given China’s membership in the group.

keep readingShow less
Trump Khamanei
Top image credit: Bella1105/shutterstock.com

Could Trump bomb Iran before settling on a rationale?

Middle East

Shifting justifications for a war are never a good sign, and they strongly suggest that the war in question was not warranted.

In the Vietnam War, the principal public rationale of saving South Vietnam from communism got replaced in the minds of the warmakers — especially after losing hope of winning the contest in Vietnam — by the belief that the United States had to keep fighting to preserve its credibility. In the Iraq War, when President George W. Bush’s prewar argument about weapons of mass destruction fell apart, he shifted to a rationale centered on bringing freedom and democracy to Iraq.

keep readingShow less
James Holtsnider
Top image credit: James Holtsnider, U.S. President Donald Trump's nominee to be ambassador to Jordan, testifies before a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on nominations on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 11, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

New US ambassador's charm offensive is backfiring in Jordan

Middle East

Since arriving in Amman around three months ago to serve as the U.S. Ambassador to Jordan, James Holtsnider quickly became one of the highest-profile envoys in the Hashemite Kingdom. In addition to presenting his credentials to King Abdullah II, Holtsnider has met with Jordanian soccer players, attended weddings, and joined tribal gatherings.

However, a January 14 request by a U.S. Embassy delegation for the ambassador to offer condolences at the family home of former Karak mayor Abdullah Al-Dmour showed that many Jordanians have little interest in participating in Holtsnider’s public relations initiative. Dmour’s relatives rejected the U.S. ambassador’s wish to visit. Dmour’s tribe issued a statement noting Holtsnider’s request “violates Jordanian tribal customs, which separates the sanctity of mourning from any political presence with public implications.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.