Follow us on social

google cta
Pierre Poilievre Donald Trump Mark Carney

As Canadians go to polls, Trump keeps banging on annexation

President insists he’s not ‘trolling,’ that our northern neighbors would be better off as Americans

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

As Canadians lined up to vote in today’s Canadian elections, Secretary of State Marco Rubio reiterated President Trump’s assertions that Canada would be better off as the 51st American state, days after Trump said he was serious and was not “trolling” on the matter.

“What the President said, and he has said this repeatedly, is he was told by the previous Prime Minister [Justin Trudeau] that Canada could not survive without unfair trade with the United States, at which point [Trump] asked, ‘Well, if you can't survive as a nation without treating us unfairly in trade, then you should become a state,’” Rubio said on Meet the Press.

“We'll deal with a new leadership of Canada. There are many things we’ll work with cooperatively [with] Canada on…but we actually don't like the way they treated us when it comes to trade,” Rubio explained.

Meet the Press host Michelle Welker asked whether there were “policy steps” taken to annex Canada; Rubio did not provide any. She pressed him to answer explicitly whether the U.S. wants to make Canada the 51st state; in response, Rubio reiterated Trump’s comments.

“I think the president has stated repeatedly he thinks Canada would be better off as a state,” he responded.

Back in mid-March, Rubio previously framed Trump’s calls to annex Canada as a “disagreement” between Canada and the U.S., saying “the president has made his argument as to why he thinks Canada would be better off joining the United States for economic purposes. There's a disagreement between the president's position and the position of the Canadian government.”

Altogether, Rubio’s Meet the Press comments come amid souring U.S.-Canada relations, where repeated annexation calls and an intense tariff spat led Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney to say the old U.S.-Canada relationship was “over” late last month.

Rubio’s statements also follow Trump’s recent comments in an interview with Time Magazine, published Friday, emphasizing he “wasn’t trolling” about annexing America’s northern neighbor. “I'm really not trolling. Canada is an interesting case. We lose $200 to $250 billion a year supporting Canada,” he told TIME magazine. “We’re taking care of their military. We're taking care of every aspect of their lives. We don't need anything from Canada. And I say the only way this thing really works is for Canada to become a state,” he said.

Today’s elections for the Parliament are primarily pitting the Liberal Party led by current Canadian Prime Minister, Mark Carney, and the Conservative Party and its leader Pierre Poilievre. An Abacus Data poll yesterday found Carney in the lead, with Carney receiving 41% of the prospective vote over Poilievre’s 39%.

In comments made today, Trump even seemed to suggest Canadians should vote for him. “Elect the man who has the strength and wisdom to cut your taxes in half, increase your military power, for free, to the highest level in the World, have your Car, Steel, Aluminum, Lumber, Energy, and all other businesses, QUADRUPLE in size, WITH ZERO TARIFFS OR TAXES, if Canada becomes the cherished 51st. State of the United States of America,” he wrote.

“America can no longer subsidize Canada with the Hundreds of Billions of Dollars a year that we have been spending in the past. It makes no sense unless Canada is a State!”

As Canadians head to the ballot box, their politicians are telling Trump to butt out. “President Trump, stay out of our election. The only people who will decide the future of Canada are Canadians at the ballot box,” Conservative Party leader and PM hopeful Pierre Poilievre wrote today on X, emphasizing Canadians would “stand up” to America.

“Canada will always be proud, sovereign and independent and we will NEVER be the 51st state. Today Canadians can vote for change so we can strengthen our country, stand on our own two feet and stand up to America from a position of strength,” he wrote.


Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre (Shutterstock/Marlon Bartram); President Donald Trump (Joshua Sukoff/Shutterstock) and Canadian PM and Liberal Party leader Mark Carney (Shutterstock/Harrison Ha)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?
Top image credit: Sens. Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) sit look on during a congressional hearing in January, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Sipa USA)

Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?

Washington Politics

On Wednesday, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) told CNN that he would support new funding for the U.S. war with Iran — but only if Israel and Arab Gulf states help pay for it.

“We’re using our taxpayer money to protect those countries,” Gallego said. “We’re using our men to protect these countries. They need to throw in and have skin in the game too.”

keep readingShow less
Polymarket Iran War
Top photo credit: Polymarket logo (Shutterstock/PJ McDonald) and Scene following an airstrike on an Iranian police centre damaging residential buildings around it in Niloofar square in central Tehran on march 1, 2026. (Hamid Vakili/Parspix/ABACAPRESS.COM)

Prediction markets are a national security threat

Latest

Hours before an Israeli attack in Tehran killed Ayatollah Khamenei, an account on the prediction market Polymarket made over half a million dollars wagering that Iran’s Supreme Leader would vacate office before 3/31. That account, named “Magamyman,” was not the only one to cash in on the attacks.

Half a dozen Polymarket accounts made over $1.2M betting that the U.S. “strikes Iran by February 28, 2026.” Those accounts were allegedly paid for through cryptocurrency wallets that had previously not been funded prior to Feb. 27. Overall, prediction market users bet over $255M on markets related to the attacks in Iran on the prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket alone.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.