Follow us on social

A bucket list for Biden

A bucket list for Biden

The president has 70 days. He can get a lot done — if he sets his mind and the power of the office to it.

Analysis | Military Industrial Complex

Freed of the constraints of the presidential campaign, the Biden administration can use the next two months to recalibrate U.S. policy abroad, clean up several messes, and — maybe — rehabilitate the reputation of his team and our country.

Here’s a bucket list of executive actions the Biden administration should take to leave the United States, the world, and its legacy in a better place.

Most immediately, demand a ceasefire and the withdrawal of the Israeli Defense Forces from southern Lebanon, Gaza and Palestinian Authority-administered areas of the West Bank, and an end to all aerial bombardment in order to obtain the release of hostages and protect the lives of U.S. citizens and others in the region. Use this ceasefire to test whether the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hamas halt their attacks on Israel.

If Israel refuses, announce the immediate cessation of U.S. arms shipments and aid flows other than those intended for the Iron Dome shield. This move would follow the October 13 letter from Secretary of Defense Austin and Secretary of State Blinken to their Israeli counterparts warning them that if Israel did not comply with its obligations to allow U.S.-supported humanitarian aid into Gaza within 30 days, there would be “implications” pursuant to U.S. law. The 30 days are up as of today, and not one of the conditions has been met.

It’s way past time to end U.S. complicity in the slaughter and starvation of tens of thousands of innocents.

Also clearly reiterate U.S. opposition to the continued expansion of settlements in the West Bank and to construction of new settlements in Gaza. Announce increased U.S. sanctions on individuals and entities complicit in settler violence or threats against Palestinians in the West Bank.

To de-escalate the spiral of violence across the Middle East, reach an interim deal with the new Iranian government on its nuclear program. At a minimum, revive the informal understanding worked on during the summer of 2023. This will hopefully serve as a break on further retaliation by Iran against Israel and offer an opening for further diplomacy by the Trump administration.

Draw down U.S. forces from Iraq. The United States does not need to maintain thousands of sitting-duck troops in Iraq to deter the return of ISIS. A plan for gradual withdrawal through 2026 has been announced. Recommit to the implementation of this plan and take the next step in transferring to the Iraqi government full responsibility for its national security.

Do not escalate U.S. support for the war in Ukraine and refrain from taking any action that could undermine prospects for a negotiated settlement. As Richard Haass and NYT national security reporters are now acknowledging, and my colleagues at Quincy Institute have long maintained, time is not on Ukraine’s side in the war. Russian forces are advancing, and this winter is going to be hellish unless the fighting is brought to an end and Ukraine’s electrical grid is repaired.

The war is also destabilizing politics in Europe and beyond. The Biden team should consult with the incoming administration on what assistance Ukraine needs, to be paired with outreach to incentivize a positive Russian response to bring both sides to the negotiating table.

End comprehensive sanctions on Venezuela. Hundreds of thousands of people are emigrating from Cuba and Venezuela, where U.S. sanctions have helped make life unbearable for large parts of the population. Instead of achieving the desired policy outcomes, counterproductive sanctions have hurt people and forced many to make the difficult decision to leave their homeland for the United States.

Take steps to normalize relations with Cuba. Remove Cuba from the U.S. list of State Sponsors of Terrorism; enable more normal travel by allowing cruises, use of hotels, independent people-to-people trips and performances; and suspend Title III of the Helms-Burton law, as President Obama did, to prevent nuisance lawsuits that interfere with U.S. investment and business in Cuba.

In his waning days in office, Trump imposed comprehensive sanctions on Cuba; Biden can undo them — better late than never. This is particularly pressing given public concern over unauthorized immigration to the United States.

Take additional steps to close the Guantanamo Bay detention camp by overriding the decision by Secretary of Defense Austin to pursue further court action to reject the military commission plea agreement he authorized with the 9/11 masterminds. Put an end to the 22-year-long global public relations problem that Guantanamo has posed by escalating efforts to find third-country homes for those remaining prisoners who have never been charged.

Take steps to normalize relations with Afghanistan. Ending the U.S. war in Afghanistan was courageous and correct. Now President Biden needs to lead the way toward restoring diplomatic relations by empowering the Afghanistan Affairs Unit in Doha to proactively engage senior Taliban figures and set a positive precedent by sending a U.S. diplomat to meet with the Taliban in Kabul. The Fulbright program for Afghans should be reinstated, and processing of the remaining special immigrant visa (SIV) holders located outside the United States should be fast-tracked.

Reinstate the Fulbright and Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange programs with China/Hong Kong. We need to know more, not less, about China. President Biden should restore these important programs that Trump killed with a stroke of his pen.

President Biden has an extraordinary opportunity in this period to act on his conscience, free of domestic political constraints. For the good of the country and its reputation abroad, his historical legacy, and those who have suffered from destructive U.S. policies, I hope he will act with alacrity to check them off of his bucket list.


Top photo credit: President Joe Biden on the White House Lawn, July 14, 2023. (Shutterstock/Salma Bashir)
Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
US Marines
Top image credit: U.S. Marines with Force Reconnaissance Platoon, Maritime Raid Force, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to clear a room during a limited scale raid exercise at Sam Hill Airfield, Queensland, Australia, June 21, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Alora Finigan)

Cartels are bad but they're not 'terrorists.' This is mission creep.

Military Industrial Complex

There is a dangerous pattern on display by the Trump administration. The president and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seem to hold the threat and use of military force as their go-to method of solving America’s problems and asserting state power.

The president’s reported authorization for the Pentagon to use U.S. military warfighting capacity to combat drug cartels — a domain that should remain within the realm of law enforcement — represents a significant escalation. This presents a concerning evolution and has serious implications for civil liberties — especially given the administration’s parallel moves with the deployment of troops to the southern border, the use of federal forces to quell protests in California, and the recent deployment of armed National Guard to the streets of our nation’s capital.

keep readingShow less
Howard Lutnick
Top photo credit: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC, 8/26/25 (CNBC screengrab)

Is nationalizing the defense industry such a bad idea?

Military Industrial Complex

The U.S. arms industry is highly consolidated, specialized, and dependent on government contracts. Indeed, the largest U.S. military contractors are already effectively extensions of the state — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is right to point that out.

His suggestion in a recent media appearance to partially nationalize the likes of Lockheed Martin is hardly novel. The economist John Kenneth Galbraith argued for the nationalization of the largest military contractors in 1969. More recently, various academics and policy analysts have advocated for partial or full nationalization of military firms in publications including The Nation, The American Conservative, The Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), and The Seattle Journal for Social Justice.

keep readingShow less
Modi Trump
Top image credit: White House, February 2025

Trump's India problem could become a Global South crisis

Asia-Pacific

As President Trump’s second term kicked off, all signs pointed to a continued upswing in U.S.-India relations. At a White House press conference in February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke of his vision to “Make India Great Again” and how the United States under Trump would play a central role. “When it’s MAGA plus MIGA, it becomes a mega partnership for prosperity,” Modi said.

During Trump’s first term, the two populist leaders hosted rallies for each other in their respective countries and cultivated close personal ties. Aside from the Trump-Modi bromance, U.S.-Indian relations have been on a positive trajectory for over two decades, driven in part by mutual suspicion of China. But six months into his second term, Trump has taken several actions that have led to a dramatic downturn in U.S.-India relations, with India-China relations suddenly on the rise.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.