First artillery, then tanks, then warplanes, then what?
The US slow climb up the escalatory ladder in Ukraine appears to be moving a bit faster — without a lot of talk about consequences.
The US slow climb up the escalatory ladder in Ukraine appears to be moving a bit faster — without a lot of talk about consequences.
Now that Kyiv is in a strong position to negotiate, the US must flex its diplomatic muscles to bring both sides to the table.
Hopefully, more than just Tokyo’s massive new military spending will be on the agenda when the PM meets with Biden on Friday.
Once the midterms were over, all mention of holding MBS accountable disappeared, and in fact Biden now seems to be catering to him.
The new president is clear that he’s willing to work with the United States, but his country will do its own bidding in international relations.
After an extraordinary year of foreign policy, our Quincy Institute experts weigh in on Ukraine, Russia, China, the Middle East, and more.
Unfortunately Lynne Tracy, Biden’s nominee to be the next ambassador to Russia, reflects the stale views of the more recent past.
Experts say these systems are expensive, take months of training, and will not give Ukraine the full air cover they want.
As Biden hosts dozens of African leaders this week, security will be on the menu. We asked experts if it was time for real change.
As a key player in Kyiv’s defense and the leader of sanctions against Russia, Washington is obligated to help find a way out.
The president should seize this opportunity — having recently missed one already — to show he truly ‘stands’ with the people there.
Moscow’s moves are a serious escalation — Washington must heed its Cold War lessons now to avoid a wider confrontation.
Beijing is vying for the leadership role among these countries and making inroads. Is Washington nimble enough to make adjustments?
Attempts to isolate Russia over Ukraine with sanctions that are ultimately hurting the global economy aren’t having the desired impact.
Both US and Iran are to blame for the failure to renew the nuclear deal, but Tel Aviv is throwing in any monkey wrench it can to sabotage it.
Washington continues to treat el-Sisi with kid gloves, supplying the despotic regime with aid, hurting its own credibility in the process.
Washington provides weapons and protection to these monarchies, but honestly, what is it getting in return?
‘No boots on the ground’ seems like an empty assurance considering this new report from the New York Times.
Will the administration take additional steps to help Afghanistan or sit on the sidelines because it won’t recognize the government?
These weapons have little to no military value and their use only risks killing or harming civilians, even decades after a war has ended.
By restricting the meeting to democracies, the president omitted countries key to addressing the agenda’s top issues.