Follow us on social

2023-03-01t004108z_115845616_mt1sipa0007ysa0a_rtrmadp_3_sipa-usa-scaled

GOP to Biden officials: Diplomacy and trade with China a ‘sign of weakness’

Members of select committee on CCP hammer administration on policy toward Beijing.

Asia-Pacific

Republican members of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party used much of their time during a hearing Thursday to accuse Biden officials of “weakness” for their willingness to engage with China, both diplomatically and economically.

The charges focused in part on the recent visits to China by prominent senior officials, including Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, and climate envoy John Kerry. The members of  the select committee grilled three officials from three key agencies on the administration’s policy toward Beijing — the Pentagon’s Ely Ratner, the State Department’s Daniel Kritenbrink, and Thea Rozman Kendler from the Commerce Department.  The primary lines of attack, according to Jake Werner, a research fellow focusing on U.S-China relations at the Quincy Institute were an “intense anxiety about the health of US society blamed on China” and  “posing all issues in the relationship as zero-sum and therefore demanding confrontation.”

Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-Fla.) was concerned with the fact that leadership in Washington, and not their Chinese counterparts, were the ones pushing for these meetings.

“When was the last time the PRC requested a meeting with a senior U.S. official?” Gimenez asked. “The point I’m trying to make is that we continue to be asking for all these high-level meetings with high-level officials in China. We continue to do that…. Doesn’t it seem to you like that might be looked at around the world as a sign of weakness?” 

Some Democratic members pushed back at this characterization, with Rep. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) saying that he was “pretty alarmed” by the current discourse on the Hill surrounding speaking with China and Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-Mass.) lamenting the “concerning false equivalency between diplomacy and weakness” during the hearing. 

Republican members argued that not only was diplomacy a sign of weakness, but so too is trade, with two calling for the end of all trade with China moving forward. While questioning Rozman Kendler on why the U.S. continues to trade with Beijing, Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-Mo.) said “we’ve got to stop everything going to China,” because a “willingness to be a partner with them endangers us down the road.” 

In terms of Taiwan, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) argued in favor of the One China policy, saying that the United States can “assist Taiwan, as many [in Congress] want to, (...) but still affirm the One China policy architected by Dr. [Henry] Kissinger,” and that Blinken had been “appropriate” in saying that during his recent visit. 

In response, Kritenbrink affirmed that there had been “absolutely no change to the One China policy.” 

“The dispute over Taiwan is only the most dangerous in a long list of zero-sum economic and military tensions between the US and China that are pushing the two toward conflict. For the Biden administration’s belated turn to diplomacy with China to succeed, it will need to move beyond communication for its own sake,” Werner said in comments before the hearing.

“The two powers must focus on addressing urgent common interests like climate, global development, and global governance reform—redirecting their efforts from exacerbating zero-sum economic and military dynamics to working jointly on overcoming them.”


Representative Mike Gallagher (R-WI), Committee Chair, questions witnesses during a House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party hearing on the CCP’s threat to America, at the U.S. Capitol, in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, February 28, 2023. (Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA)No Use Germany.
Asia-Pacific
Mark Levin
Top photo credit: Erick Stakelbeck on TBN/Screengrab

The great fade out: Neocon influencers rage as they diminish

Media

Mark Levin appears to be having a meltdown.

The veteran neoconservative talk host is repulsed by reports that President Donald Trump might be inching closer to an Iranian nuclear deal, reducing the likelihood of war. In addition to his rants on how this would hurt Israel, Levin has been howling to anyone who will listen that any deal with Iran needs approval from Congress (funny he doesn’t have the same attitude for waging war, only for making peace).

keep readingShow less
american military missiles
Top photo credit: Fogcatcher/Shutterstock

5 ways the military industrial complex is a killer

Latest

Congress is on track to finish work on the fiscal year 2025 Pentagon budget this week, and odds are that it will add $150 billion to its funding for the next few years beyond what the department even asked for. Meanwhile, President Trump has announced a goal of over $1 trillion for the Pentagon for fiscal year 2026.

With these immense sums flying out the door, it’s a good time to take a critical look at the Pentagon budget, from the rationales given to justify near record levels of spending to the impact of that spending in the real world. Here are five things you should know about the Pentagon budget and the military-industrial complex that keeps the churn going.

keep readingShow less
Sudan
Top image credit: A Sudanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed combat vehicle as Sudan's army retakes ground and some displaced residents return to ravaged capital in the state of Khartoum Sudan March 26, 2025. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig

Will Sudan attack the UAE?

Africa

Recent weeks events have dramatically cast the Sudanese civil war back into the international spotlight, drawing renewed scrutiny to the role of external actors, particularly the United Arab Emirates.

This shift has been driven by Sudan's accusations at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against the UAE concerning violations of the Genocide Convention, alongside drone strikes on Port Sudan that Khartoum vociferously attributes to direct Emirati participation. Concurrently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly reaffirmed the UAE's deep entanglement in the conflict at a Senate hearing last week.

From Washington, another significant and sudden development also surfaced last week: the imposition of U.S. sanctions on the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) for alleged chemical weapons use. This dramatic accusation was met by an immediate denial from Sudan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which vehemently dismissed the claims as "unfounded" and criticized the U.S. for bypassing the proper international mechanisms, specifically the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, despite Sudan's active membership on its Executive Council.

Despite the gravity of such an accusation, corroboration for the use of chemical agents in Sudan’s war remains conspicuously absent from public debate or reporting, save for a January 2025 New York Times article citing unnamed U.S. officials. That report itself contained a curious disclaimer: "Officials briefed on the intelligence said the information did not come from the United Arab Emirates, an American ally that is also a staunch supporter of the R.S.F."

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.