Follow us on social

52244296927_b58d375f68_o-scaled

What the Biden-Yoon summit left out

Nuclear saber rattling hasn't changed North Korea's behavior in the past and it likely won't now.

Analysis | Asia-Pacific

Wednesday’s U.S.-South Korea summit was meant to inject more stability into the Korean peninsula's security landscape by reinforcing the alliance’s military deterrence posture against North Korea. For the first time ever, Washington and Seoul put together a separate document purely dedicated to reaffirming the U.S. extended deterrence commitment, dubbed the Washington Declaration

They agreed to hold new table-top military drills, upgrade in both quantity and quality of the rotational deployments and visits of U.S. strategic assets to South Korea, and establish a new high-level dialogue for bilateral military and nuclear consultations.

The announcement of periodic visits of a U.S. Ohio class nuclear-armed submarine to South Korea, along with the hard-nosed message by President Biden at the joint press conference that he will destroy the North Korean regime if it attacks the United States or U.S. allies, all intended to send strong signals of resolve and threat against an increasingly aggressive and provocative Pyongyang.

It’s unclear whether any of this will compel Pyongyang to change its behavior.  

To be sure, demonstrating a credible level of strength and threat is necessary in order to dissuade North Korea from engaging in destabilizing and dangerous behavior. But credibly reassuring North Korea that its self-restraint will not be taken advantage of, or that there will be clear incentives for North Korea to de-escalate and act more diplomatically also matters for effective deterrence. 

Thus far, purely relying on sticks to punish and pressure North Korea has not worked particularly well. No matter the increased size and intensity of joint military exercises and regardless of the existing stringent sanctions, Pyongyang has refused to talk, launched a record-breaking number of ballistic missiles last year and remains just as belligerent, and accelerated its nuclear and missile development. 

Washington and Seoul, in the joint statement, appropriately acknowledged that “diplomacy is the only viable way” of achieving peace on the Korean Peninsula. But it remains far from certain what necessary actions of reassurance they intend to take in order to convince Pyongyang that returning to negotiations is worthwhile. 

Simply repeating that they are open to dialogue without precondition has not sounded incredibly credible to Pyongyang, especially when much of Washington and Seoul’s focus has been on countering North Korea militarily, squeezing the North Korean economy, and improving North Korea’s grave human rights situation. All these policies may be based on reasonable motives but undoubtedly exacerbate the longstanding North Korean suspicion of a hostile U.S. intent to fundamentally change its regime. 

As one analyst points out, even if Washington says it does not have any intention to alter North Korea’s system, how can Pyongyang believe it and agree to give up or even reduce its weapons, looking at the American track record of supporting regime change in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and so on? 

Convincing Pyongyang to talk would indeed require more reassuring American and South Korean gestures for diplomacy and engagement. Of course, Pyongyang’s deeply destabilizing behavior is largely to blame for how the situation on the Korean Peninsula has become so tense. But if just blaming North Korea and trying to hold it accountable by pressure and punishment has all but heightened military tension and increased the risk of conflict, it is perhaps not so wise to keep going down this road. 


President Joe Biden participates in a restricted bilateral meeting with South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, Saturday, May 21, 2022, at the People’s House in Seoul, South Korea. (Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz)
Analysis | Asia-Pacific
Kim Jong Un
Top photo credit: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un visits the construction site of the Ragwon County Offshore Farm, North Korea July 13, 2025. KCNA via REUTERS

Kim Jong Un is nuking up and playing hard to get

Asia-Pacific

President Donald Trump’s second term has so far been a series of “shock and awe” campaigns both at home and abroad. But so far has left North Korea untouched even as it arms for the future.

The president dramatically broke with precedent during his first term, holding two summits as well as a brief meeting at the Demilitarized Zone with the North’s Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un. Unfortunately, engagement crashed and burned in Hanoi. The DPRK then pulled back, essentially severing contact with both the U.S. and South Korea.

keep readingShow less
Why new CENTCOM chief Brad Cooper is as wrong as the old one
Top photo credit: U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Brad Cooper speaks to guests at the IISS Manama Dialogue in Manama, Bahrain, November 17, 2023. REUTERS/Hamad I Mohammed

Why new CENTCOM chief Brad Cooper is as wrong as the old one

Middle East

If accounts of President Donald Trump’s decision to strike Iranian nuclear facilities this past month are to be believed, the president’s initial impulse to stay out of the Israel-Iran conflict failed to survive the prodding of hawkish advisers, chiefly U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Michael Kurilla.

With Kurilla, an Iran hawk and staunch ally of both the Israeli government and erstwhile national security adviser Mike Waltz, set to leave office this summer, advocates of a more restrained foreign policy may understandably feel like they are out of the woods.

keep readingShow less
Putin Trump
Top photo credit: Vladimir Putin (Office of the President of the Russian Federation) and Donald Trump (US Southern Command photo)

How Trump's 50-day deadline threat against Putin will backfire

Europe

In the first six months of his second term, President Donald Trump has demonstrated his love for three things: deals, tariffs, and ultimatums.

He got to combine these passions during his Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Monday. Only moments after the two leaders announced a new plan to get military aid to Ukraine, Trump issued an ominous 50-day deadline for Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire. “We're going to be doing secondary tariffs if we don't have a deal within 50 days,” Trump told the assembled reporters.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.