Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1368689957-scaled

Defense industry CEOs face tough questions at Politico conference ... from a protester

The event’s sponsors were given a prominent platform to sell the military industrial complex without any official scrutiny.

Reporting | Media

Politico’s national security and foreign policy coverage took some heat late last year for being sponsored in part by the defense industry, and the Beltway media outlet leaned into its relationship with weapons makers this week by prominently featuring industry leaders at its 2022 Defense Summit in Washington. 

Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and another less well-known firm, Improbable U.S. Defense & National Security, sponsored the Summit. But the companies’ names were not just displayed prominently at the Summit and on its website — as is somewhat usual for this kind of event — Politico also gave a representative from each company a prominent role in the Summit by participating in what it dubbed “executive conversations.” 

Except the three panels were less conversational and more infomercial, as the Politico interviewer in each appeared to rattle off a series of scripted questions that let the companies explain why their products are necessary for the defense of the United States. It was essentially similar to sponsored content one might see on some mainstream news websites. 

Politico CEO Goli Sheikholeslami was tasked with shepherding Lockheed’s ads with leading questions for its CEO, Jim Taiclet. Sheikholeslami teed up Taiclet’s talking points about a dangerous world with China as the focus, Taiclet’s “frontline perspective,” a reference to his military service, the inhibiting nature of continuing resolutions on military contracts, and Lockheed’s future outlook. Taiclet argued that the Pentagon needed a parallel funding pipeline, “a swim lane,” so that the defense industry could make its products faster. "That is the only way we are going to keep up with the Chinese,” he said.

Politico’s vice president for client partnerships and paid media Heidi Sommer later gave Improbable president and general manager Caitlin Dohrman many opportunities to tell us “about this technology that you all have been pioneering.” In response to Sommer’s questions, Dohrman appeared to be reading her answers directly from a notebook she had on stage. 

Lastly, Cally Baute, Politico’s senior vice president for consumer business spoke with Raytheon president Wes Kremer. Baute praised Raytheon’s hypersonic weapons as “game changers for the military,” and provided Kremer with many opportunities to say why the U.S. military needs Raytheon’s products. 

The only scrutiny any of these defense firms received was from a protester during Taiclet’s “executive conversation.” She crashed the stage holding a sign that read, “Lockheed Loves War,” saying that the company is “a war profiteer.”  

“The U.S. military is the largest polluter in the entire history of the world,” the protester said. “You’re guilty and the whole world knows it. There’s no place for you in our future.” 

“Don’t be rough with her,” Taiclet can be heard telling the security as they ushered the protester off the stage. 

After the scene ended, neither Sheikholeslami nor Taiclet acknowledged what had just happened. 

“So, you were talking about the budget process,” Sheikholeslami said. 


Editorial credit: Serhii Yevdokymov / Shutterstock.com
Reporting | Media
Kim Jong Un
Top photo credit: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un visits the construction site of the Ragwon County Offshore Farm, North Korea July 13, 2025. KCNA via REUTERS

Kim Jong Un is nuking up and playing hard to get

Asia-Pacific

President Donald Trump’s second term has so far been a series of “shock and awe” campaigns both at home and abroad. But so far has left North Korea untouched even as it arms for the future.

The president dramatically broke with precedent during his first term, holding two summits as well as a brief meeting at the Demilitarized Zone with the North’s Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un. Unfortunately, engagement crashed and burned in Hanoi. The DPRK then pulled back, essentially severing contact with both the U.S. and South Korea.

keep readingShow less
Why new CENTCOM chief Brad Cooper is as wrong as the old one
Top photo credit: U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Brad Cooper speaks to guests at the IISS Manama Dialogue in Manama, Bahrain, November 17, 2023. REUTERS/Hamad I Mohammed

Why new CENTCOM chief Brad Cooper is as wrong as the old one

Middle East

If accounts of President Donald Trump’s decision to strike Iranian nuclear facilities this past month are to be believed, the president’s initial impulse to stay out of the Israel-Iran conflict failed to survive the prodding of hawkish advisers, chiefly U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Michael Kurilla.

With Kurilla, an Iran hawk and staunch ally of both the Israeli government and erstwhile national security adviser Mike Waltz, set to leave office this summer, advocates of a more restrained foreign policy may understandably feel like they are out of the woods.

keep readingShow less
Putin Trump
Top photo credit: Vladimir Putin (Office of the President of the Russian Federation) and Donald Trump (US Southern Command photo)

How Trump's 50-day deadline threat against Putin will backfire

Europe

In the first six months of his second term, President Donald Trump has demonstrated his love for three things: deals, tariffs, and ultimatums.

He got to combine these passions during his Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Monday. Only moments after the two leaders announced a new plan to get military aid to Ukraine, Trump issued an ominous 50-day deadline for Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire. “We're going to be doing secondary tariffs if we don't have a deal within 50 days,” Trump told the assembled reporters.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.