Follow us on social

google cta
Lobby Horse

Saudi Arabia was the real winner at FIFA Club World Cup

Money has allowed the Kingdom to launder its image while positioning itself as the preeminent power broker for the world's most popular sport

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

On Sunday, the FIFA Club World Cup came to an end as England’s Chelsea delivered a surprising 3-0 pummelling of European champions Paris Saint-Germain in New Jersey’s MetLife stadium. The live broadcast frequently cut to President Trump and FIFA President Gianni Infantino — the hosts and facilitators of the tournament — sitting in a box together watching the game.

But there was a third man equally responsible for the tournament, who was absent in attendance but whose influence reverberated throughout the stadium: Saudi Crown Prince Mohamed bin Salman.

Millions of viewers watched on a free streaming service owned in part by Saudi Arabia. Players wheeled off to celebrate goals in front of billboards that advertised “PIF” — a reference to the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF). The oil-rich Kingdom appears to have even supplied the tournament prize money.

Chelsea will get the plaudits, but MBS and his Public PIF might as well be the real winners, having used the tournament to further position Saudi Arabia as the new preeminent power broker in the world’s most popular sport.

In a Fox Interview in 2023, MBS vowed to “continue sportswashing.” He has kept that promise, taking the footballing world by storm. And last December, the Crown Prince got his prized possession: the 2034 World Cup.

FIFA’s decision to award Saudi Arabia hosting rights for the prestigious tournament was the culmination of a years-long lobbying campaign from MBS and FIFA President Gianni Infantino to secure the vote. MBS needed Infantino to cement the fusion between the world’s most popular sport — popularly referred to as the beautiful game — with a country carrying out significant human rights abuses.

Infantino, for his part, needed MBS’s seemingly bottomless pockets. The Public Investment Fund, where MBS serves as chairman, oversees some $925 billion in assets. A senior official of the footballing association in England described Saudi’s new relationship with FIFA as a "marriage of convenience.”

For a marriage of convenience, the two look particularly chummy. Infantino became Saudi Arabia’s most outspoken champion, even appearing in a video released by the Saudi Ministry of Sports. The FIFA president pressured countries to vote for the Kingdom’s bid to host the World Cup and even helped ward off challenges from potential hosts Australia and Indonesia. Nicholas McGeehan, founding co-director of football campaign group Fair Square, told BBC Sport that the World Cup process effectively acted "to ensure that Saudi Arabia was selected as host.”

Not long after Saudi Arabia’s announcement was formalized, sports streaming service DAZN paid $1 billion for the broadcast rights for the Club World Cup tournament. A few weeks later, a subsidiary of the PIF acquired a minority stake in DAZN worth $1 billion. Then, FIFA announced the prize money for the tournament: also $1 billion.

“Just simply following the money, it may appear that Saudi Arabia, after winning the right to host the World Cup, were able to help FIFA in return via D Zone to fund the club World Cup FIFA,” Adam Leventhal explained on the Athletic FC podcast. Chief Sports Writer Barney Ronay called the deals an “entirely illusory circle of hand-washing.”

Saudi Arabia’s ventures into soccer go far beyond the World Cup and Club World Cup. In 2021, the Public Investment Fund acquired an 80% stake in Newcastle United, one of England’s oldest and most storied clubs. Lionel Messi, arguably the best footballer to grace the pitch, is a tourism ambassador for Saudi Arabia. As part of his contract, he is not allowed to say anything that would “tarnish” the reputation of the kingdom.

Meanwhile, Cristiano Ronaldo, Messi’s longtime foil, moved to Saudi club Al Nassr in 2023 and just signed a new contract worth close to $1 billion.

Three Saudi entities, the Public Investment Fund, Riyadh Air, and Aramco, sponsored the Gold Cup, the North American tournament hosted by the U.S. this summer. Despite being located over 6,000 miles away from North America, the Saudi Arabian national team was invited to play in the tournament. Its invitation raised suspicions about whether Saudi Arabia’s presence was earned on the pitch — or in the pitchbook.

Sportswashing has become an important tool for autocrats such as MBS engaged in human rights abuses to launder their reputations. A staff report by Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations ranking member Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) published in April found that Saudi Arabia is using “sports to increase its influence and build its global reputation,” with DAZN being a billboard for PIF’s sports properties.

And Saudi Arabia has more than a few reasons for wanting to launder their reputation.In 2024, Saudi Arabia carried out a record 345 executions, and appears on track to surpass that amount in 2025, according to Amnesty International. Saudi authorities are indiscriminately killing migrants at their Southern border with Yemen. “If you attempt to flee, they shoot you,” said one Ethiopian migrant. Not long ago, Saudi Arabia was the lead instigator in a military intervention in Yemen that killed 377,000 people between 2015 and 2022.

When the World Cup was awarded to Saudi Arabia, Human Rights Watch warned that “without urgent action and comprehensive reforms, the 2034 World Cup will be tarnished by repression, discrimination and exploitation on a massive scale.”

MBS doesn’t want you to associate that with the Kingdom, or his country's involvement in the destabilizing Yemen war, or his approving the brutal murder of Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi consulate in Turkey. With enough money, MBS hopes to sweep all of that under the rug of soccer, wrestling, tennis, Formula 1 racing, and golf, among other sports.

And FIFA is more than willing to go along with it. The footballing organization assessed Saudi Arabia’s World Cup bid to merely have a “medium” human rights risk and that the tournament would “contribute to positive human rights outcomes.”

Nothing more than a shrug.


Top image credit: Khody Akhavi via AI
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?
Top image credit: Sens. Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) sit look on during a congressional hearing in January, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Sipa USA)

Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?

Washington Politics

On Wednesday, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) told CNN that he would support new funding for the U.S. war with Iran — but only if Israel and Arab Gulf states help pay for it.

“We’re using our taxpayer money to protect those countries,” Gallego said. “We’re using our men to protect these countries. They need to throw in and have skin in the game too.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.