Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1649871457-scaled

Moscow’s ‘dirty bomb’ claims highlight risk of escalation

Russia and the West are finally talking, but perhaps not for the right reasons.

Reporting | Europe
google cta
google cta

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu held several calls with his American and European counterparts over the weekend following months of relative silence between Moscow and the West.

The main topic of the conversations was the conflict in Ukraine, with a focus on avoiding red lines that could lead to escalation, according to readouts from each interlocutor. In many of the calls, Shoigu claimed that Kyiv is planning to use a “dirty bomb,” or an explosive device that spreads nuclear material upon detonation but is not a full nuclear weapon. 

Western leaders flatly rejected the accusation, implying that Moscow is using it to set the stage for a “false flag” attack that the Kremlin can blame on Kyiv. “The world would see through any attempt to use this allegation as a pretext for escalation,” the U.S., Britain, and France wrote in a joint statement following the calls. The Kremlin has not publicly shared any information to back up its allegation.

Meanwhile, Russian media reported that, in a rare move, Moscow is deploying its military team that specializes in containing nuclear, chemical, or biological contamination.

George Beebe, the director of grand strategy at the Quincy Institute, said the reports are a stark reminder that the war “could rapidly escalate into a direct U.S.-Russian confrontation.” The calls also give a glimpse into internal Russian debates about the conflict, according to Beebe.

“Debate inside Russia has concluded that the West has lost its fear of nuclear war, and that as a result Russia needs to reestablish the ‘balance of terror’ that it believes underpinned stability during the Cold War,” he said.

“It is unclear to what degree these reports reflect a Russian effort to restore that Western fear of nuclear war, and to what degree if any Moscow actually suspects some Ukrainian groups might be preparing to use a radiological weapon,” Beebe added. “Either explanation is fraught with danger of escalation.”

Despite the joint response from Western leaders, there is some evidence of differences within the bloc. Paris was the only government to say it would refuse to be drawn into an escalation spiral, adding that it favors a peaceful resolution to the conflict. And NATO ally Turkey did not add its voice to the joint statement despite also having held a call with Shoigu over the weekend.


Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu. (Shutterstock/ Sasa Dzambic Photography)
google cta
Reporting | Europe
Trump $1.5 trillion
Top image credit: Richard Peterson via shutterstock.com

The reality of Trump’s cartoonish $1.5 trillion DOD budget proposal

Military Industrial Complex

After promising on the campaign trail that he would drive the war profiteers out of Washington, and appointing Elon Musk to trim the size of government across the board, some will be surprised at President Trump’s social media post on Wednesday that the U.S. should raise the Pentagon budget to $1.5 trillion. That would mean an unprecedented increase in military spending, aside from the buildup for World War II.

The proposal is absurd on the face of it, and it’s extremely unlikely that it is the product of a careful assessment of U.S. defense needs going forward. The plan would also add $5.8 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Budget.

keep readingShow less
Trump Venezuela
Top image credit: President Donald Trump monitors U.S. military operations in Venezuela, from Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, on Saturday, January 3, 2026. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

Trump's sphere of influence gambit is sloppy, self-sabotage

Latin America

Spheres of influence stem from the very nature of states and international relations. States will always seek to secure their interests by exerting influence over their neighbors, and the more powerful the state, the greater the influence that it will seek.

That said, sphere of influence strategies vary greatly, on spectrums between relative moderation and excess, humanity and cruelty, discreet pressure and open intimidation, and intelligence and stupidity; and the present policies of the Trump administration in the Western Hemisphere show disturbing signs of inclining towards the latter.

keep readingShow less
 Ngo Dinh Diem assassination
Top photo credit: Newspaper coverage of the coup and deaths, later ruled assassination of Vietnamese leader Ngo Dinh Diem and his brother Ngo Dinh Nhu. (Los Angeles Times)

JFK oversaw Vietnam decapitation. He didn't live to witness the rest.

Washington Politics

American presidents have never been shy about unseating foreign heads of state, by either overt or covert means. Since the late 19th century, our leaders have deposed, or tried to depose their counterparts in Iran, Cuba, Iraq, Afghanistan, the Philippines, Guatemala, Honduras, Panama, and elsewhere.

Our presidents indulge in regime change when they perceive foreign leaders as inimical to U.S. security or corporate interests. But such efforts can backfire. The 1961 attempt to topple Fidel Castro, organized under President Eisenhower and executed under President Kennedy, led to a slaughter of CIA-trained invasion forces at the Bay of Pigs and a triumph for Castro’s communist government. Despite being driven from power by President George W. Bush in retribution for the 9/11 attacks, the Taliban roared back in 2023, again making Afghanistan a haven for terrorist groups.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.