Follow us on social

Palestine-video

Biden's trip to Israel is getting trickier by the day

At what point will Washington acknowledge that our "special bond" is helping forestall peace and hurting US interests in the region?

Analysis | Middle East

President Joe Biden is expected to make his first visit to Israel since taking office in late June. The past week has certainly given him more than enough to fill his agenda when he arrives. 

When Al-Jazeera reporter Shireen Abu Akleh was gunned down in Jenin, the usual war of narratives began. Even though all eyewitness accounts unambiguously report that it was Israeli soldiers who killed Abu Akleh, and Israel’s theories trying to either blame Palestinians or blur the realities were debunked by several sources, the U.S. continues to support an investigation led by Israel and insists that the situation remains unclear. 

The government in Tel Aviv  is clearly confident that any reaction from the Biden Administration will be tempered, and above all Washington ’s support — to the tune of $3 billion in aid annually, mostly military — won’t be affected by its actions. Officials there have good reason to be, if the past is any indication. Yet, it may be harder to maintain the pretense that facts on the ground are ambiguous when the whole world watched in horror as Israeli police attacked mourners at Abu Akleh’s funeral procession, even beating the pallbearers, and very nearly causing her casket to fall to the ground. 

Israel’s behavior garnered even more scorn on Monday when Palestinian Christian leaders showed a video of Israeli police storming the hospital where Shireen Abu Akleh’s body had been, even throwing a man on crutches to the ground. 

The U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Tom Nides, lodged a protest with the Israeli government, which had promised that the funeral would be respectful and that all who wanted to attend would be granted access. The Biden administration was clearly irked that Israel had broken that pledge and put the United States in a position where it was forced to mildly rebuke Israel over its actions. 

But while Abu Akleh’s death has dominated the news, the Biden administration was faced with yet another difficulty in its already thorny effort to maintain relative neutrality toward Israel’s behavior. On Thursday, the day after Abu Akleh’s killing, Israel announced that it had approved plans for 4,427 new settlement housing units throughout the West Bank, according to reports.

This represents the biggest expansion of settlements since Biden took office. Yet the administration appears to be  taking advantage of the focus on Abu Akleh’s killing and her funeral to stay silent on the matter. 

Hagit Ofran of Settlement Watch tweeted that Israel was, “Deepening the occupation and furthering us from peace. It’s bad news for Israel and for anyone who cares about the people in our region.”

Back in October 2021, Israel approved some 3,000 units, drawing a verbal rebuke from the Biden administration, but no other action. According to Axios, Nides signaled the administration’s displeasure to Israeli officials two weeks ago over this latest announcement. He was reportedly told that the new units were part of a political promise made to prevent defections from PM Naftali Bennett’s party and to keep its fragile ruling coalition together.  

All of this is occurring against an already tense backdrop in Israel and Palestine, including Israel’s aggressive approach on the Temple Mount last month, coupled with a recent decision by the Israeli High Court to expel over one thousand Palestinian residents of the Masafer Yatta region in the West Bank.

All of this will be difficult for Biden to ignore when he travels to Israel in June. The trip was intended to follow up on the recent Negev summit, which Secretary of State Antony Blinken hosted to strengthen the partnerships between Israel and friendly Arab states forged in the Abraham Accords with an eye toward constructing a bloc to counter Iran and to help accommodate a diminished U.S. role in the region. 

That is still likely to be central to Biden’s agenda, but he is also going to have to consider how his laissez-faire approach to Israel’s continuing repression of the Palestinians is playing out in the region. These recent incidents reflect a gathering storm, and Biden will find it impossible to continue the pivot away from the Middle East if the increasingly tight Israeli grip on the Palestinians and mounting Palestinian despair continues to breed violence of the kind seen in recent weeks in Jenin, Jerusalem, and in Elad — itself the inevitable result of the kind of violence Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza experience every day

While the Arab leaders who have normalized relations with Israel are already perceived as having abandoned the Palestinian cause, the killing of Abu Akleh and the police attack on her funeral was broadcast far and wide throughout the Arab world. It cannot be in Washington’s interest to be seen as holding the bag for Israel’s actions, nor to be paying for the privilege, all while lecturing human rights to other Middle Eastern governments. 

But given everything on Biden’s foreign affairs plate today — Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the struggle to revive the Iran nuclear deal, the high price of oil — the president clearly cannot afford a confrontation with Israel right now, and likely won’t be looking for one when he visits next month. 

This is especially so since both Bennett — due to the loss of his parliamentary majority — and Biden — facing midterm elections where pro-Israel groups like AIPAC and the Democratic Majority for Israel are mobilizing unprecedented amounts of money against anyone who has even the mildest criticism of Israel — are both treading on shaky political ground. 

Still, the long term harm to U.S. interests won’t go away. It doesn’t seem like the outrage over Abu Akleh’s death is going to evaporate quickly. And the administration needs to respond more forcefully to settlement expansion if it is to maintain the notion that the two-state solution has any chance of survival. So what can Biden realistically ask for?

First and foremost, the administration must make it clear that it supports a fully independent investigation into Abu Akleh’s killing. State Department spokesperson Ned Price’s initial statement, that “the Israelis have the wherewithal and the capabilities to conduct a thorough, comprehensive investigation,” was utterly unconvincing. Even Israeli Minister of Diaspora Affairs, Nachman Shai of the Labor Party, said that, "with all due respect to us, let's say that Israel's credibility is not very high in such events."

An international investigation, with a team of experts from all over the world, including the Arabs, Europe, Africa, and Asia, could have credibility. Of course, if history is any guide, Israel will not cooperate with such an inquiry and will condemn its findings if they deviate in the slightest from whatever narrative Israel prefers. But advocating such a thing would help bolster whatever image Washington wants to project as a good faith mediator.

A bolder move for Biden would be to visit the family of Shireen Abu Akleh in East Jerusalem. Before Abu Akleh’s killing, there were rumors that Biden was considering visiting the eastern, predominantly Palestinian part of the city. 

Biden could argue that this was merely a courtesy visit to the family of a journalist who lost her life for her profession. Such a visit would send a signal that the Biden administration still believes that Jerusalem is an issue that must be negotiated, and this, along with a clear statement of opposition to settlement expansion would be welcomed by Palestinians. The gesture is well short of reversing Donald Trump’s de facto recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, but it would at least be a tangible indication of a step away from that decision.

Biden’s track record indicates that he will likely do none of this, opting instead for a quick visit to convey, once again, the “unbreakable bond” with Israel. That bond seems destined to keep the United States moored in the Middle East amid distrust and insecurity between states that are now just starting to build bridges. Biden will likely eschew politically courageous options that might make the situation just a little bit better, choosing instead to reinforce the idea that the U.S. supports double standards in the region, and that is no good for anyone involved.

Thanks to our readers and supporters, Responsible Statecraft has had a tremendous year. A complete website overhaul made possible in part by generous contributions to RS, along with amazing writing by staff and outside contributors, has helped to increase our monthly page views by 133%! In continuing to provide independent and sharp analysis on the major conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as the tumult of Washington politics, RS has become a go-to for readers looking for alternatives and change in the foreign policy conversation. 

 

We hope you will consider a tax-exempt donation to RS for your end-of-the-year giving, as we plan for new ways to expand our coverage and reach in 2025. Please enjoy your holidays, and here is to a dynamic year ahead!

Family and friends carry the coffin of Al Jazeera reporter Shireen Abu Akleh, who was killed during an Israeli raid in Jenin in the occupied West Bank, as clashes erupted with Israeli security forces, during her funeral in Jerusalem, May 13, 2022. REUTERS/Ammar Awad
Analysis | Middle East
syria assad resignation
top photo credit: Men hold a Syrian opposition flag on the top of a vehicle as people celebrate after Syrian rebels announced that they have ousted President Bashar al-Assad, in Damascus, Syria December 8, 2024. REUTERS/Firas Makdesi

Assad falls, reportedly fleeing Syria. What's next?

QiOSK

(Updated Monday 12/9, 5:45 a.m.)

Embattled Syrian President Bashar al Assad, who had survived attempts to overthrow his government throughout a civil war that began in 2011, has reportedly been forced out and slipped away on a plane to parts unknown (later reports have said he is in Moscow).

keep readingShow less
Russia Putin
Russia's President Vladimir Putin speaks during a session of the Valdai Discussion Club in Sochi, Russia October 19, 2017. REUTERS/Alexander Zemlianichenko/Pool

Peace denied? Russian budget jacks up wartime economy

Europe

On December 1, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed the budget law for 2025-2027. The Duma had earlier approved the law on November 21, and the Federation Council rubber stamped it on November 27.

The main takeaway from the budget is that Russia is planning for the long haul in its war with NATO-backed Ukraine and makes clear that Russia intends to double down on defense spending no matter what the cost. While the increased budget does not shed light on expectations for a speedy resolution to the war, it is indicative that Moscow continues to prepare for conflict with both Ukraine and NATO.

keep readingShow less
Committee Hearing: The Imperative to Strengthen America's Defense Industrial Base and Workforce
Top Image Credit: Senate Committee Hearing: The Imperative to Strengthen America's Defense Industrial Base and Workforce (YouTube/Screenshot)

Industry: War with China may be imminent, but we're not ready

Military Industrial Complex

Military industry mainstays and lawmakers alike are warning of imminent conflict with China in an effort to push support for controversial deep tech, especially controversial autonomous and AI-backed systems.

The conversation, which presupposed a war with Beijing sometime in the near future, took place Wednesday on Capitol Hill at a hearing of the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) entitled, “The Imperative to Strengthen America's Defense Industrial Base and Workforce.”

keep readingShow less

Election 2024

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.