Follow us on social

google cta
33053711123_8e0e1693d1_k

COVID hardly killed weapons biz: top companies see $513 billion in sales

Brand new report shows industry giants shielded by government demand for the goods and services of war.

Reporting | Military Industrial Complex
google cta
google cta

Major U.S. arms companies accounted for no less than 54 percent of all weapons sales of the world’s 100 biggest arms suppliers in 2020, according to a new report, the latest in an annual series published by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

Despite pressure on many countries to divert already-strained budgets to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the subsequent global recession, sales of arms and military services by the 100 biggest companies increased by 1.3 percent compared to 2019 and totaled $531 billion dollars, according to the report.

The report noted that the new total — an increase of 17 percent over 2015 sales — marked the sixth year in a row of growth in arms sales. 2015 was the first year in which Chinese companies were included in what SIPRI refers to as the “Top 100.”

“The industry giants were largely shielded by sustained government demand for military goods and services," according to Alexandra Marksteiner, Researcher with the SIPRI Military Expenditure and Arms Production Programme. "In much of the world, military spending grew and some governments even accelerated payments to the arms industry in order to mitigate the (economic) impact of the Covid-19 crisis.”

As in the recent past, U.S. companies dominated the top ranks. Lockheed Martin Corp. ranked number one, followed by Raytheon Technologies, Boeing, Northrop Grunmman Corp, and General Dynamics Corp. Together, those five top companies accounted for more than $180 billion in sales during 2020, or about one third of all sales by the biggest 100 companies.

Thirty-six other U.S. companies included on the list added another $100 billion in sales, bringing the total U.S. share to $285 billion, a 1.9 percent increase over 2019’s total.

The five Chinese companies that were included in the Top 100 came to $66.8 billion in 2020, or 13 percent of the global total. That marked an increase of 1.5 percent over 2019, according to the report.

“In recent years, Chinese arms companies have benefited from the country’s military modernization programs and focus on military–civil fusion,” said Dr Nan Tian, SIPRI Senior Researcher. “They have become some of the most advanced military technology producers in the world." NORINCO, said SIPRI, co-developed the BeiDou military–civil navigation satellite system, "deepening its involvement in emerging technologies."

Led by British companies that together sold $37.5 billion in 2020, 26 European arms companies that made the list accounted for 21 percent of total arms sales, or $109 billion. That marked an increase of 6.2 percent over 2019. Britain’s BAE Systems, which ranked sixth overall behind the big five U.S. companies, accounted for $24 billion, or nearly two thirds of the Europe’s share.

While French company arms sales actually fell by 7.7 percent compared to 2019, sales by the four German in the Top 100 increased by 1.3 percent over the year, reaching nearly $9 billion, or 1.7 percent of total sales.

Russian companies, on the other hand suffered some of the sharpest drops in sales, in part due to delays in delivery schedules caused in major part by the pandemic. 

Of the weapons firms based outside the United States, China, Europe and Russia, the three Israeli companies that made the list performed the best with $10.4 billion in sales, or two percent of the total.

Israel was followed by the five listed Japanese companies that together sold $9.9 billion worth of military goods and services and by the four listed South Korean firms whose combined sales came to $6.5 billion dollars.


Lockheed Martin Space Systems in Littleton, Colo. Photo Credit: (NASA/Joel Kowsky)
google cta
Reporting | Military Industrial Complex
Trump and Lindsey Graham
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump, with Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), speaks to reporters aboard Air Force One en route from Florida to Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, U.S., January 4, 2026. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Does MAGA want Trump to ‘make regime change great again’?

Washington Politics

“We must abandon the failed policy of nation building and regime change that Hillary Clinton pushed in Iraq, Libya, Egypt and Syria,” then-candidate Donald Trump said in his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention in 2016.

This wasn’t the first time he eschewed the foreign policies of his predecessors: “We’re not looking for regime change,” he said of Iran and North Korea during a press conference in 2019. “We’ve learned that lesson a long time ago.”

keep readingShow less
Toxic exposures US military bases
Military Base Toxic Exposure Map (Courtesy of Hill & Ponton)

Mapping toxic exposure on US military bases. Hint: There's a lot.

Military Industrial Complex

Toxic exposure during military service rarely behaves like a battlefield injury.

It does not arrive with a single moment of trauma or a clear line between cause and effect. Instead, it accumulates quietly over years. By the time symptoms appear, many veterans have already changed duty stations, left the military, moved across state lines, or lost access to the documents that might have made those connections easier to prove.

keep readingShow less
Iraq War memorial wall
Top photo credit: 506th Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron, paints names Nov. 25, 2009, on Kirkuk's memorial wall, located at the Leroy Webster DV pad on base. The memorial wall holds the names of all the servicemembers who lost their lives during Operation Iraqi Freedom since the start of the campaign in 2003. (Courtesy Photo | Airman 1st Class Tanja Kambel)

Trump’s quest to kick America's ‘Iraq War syndrome’

Latin America

American forces invaded Panama in 1989 to capture Manuel Noriega, a former U.S. ally whose rule over Panama was marred by drug trafficking, corruption and human rights abuses.

But experts point to another, perhaps just as critical goal: to cure the American public of “Vietnam syndrome,” which has been described as a national malaise and aversion of foreign interventions in the wake of the failed Vietnam War.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.