Follow us on social

Philipines

US commandos in Taiwan so far do not reflect larger presence in Indo-Pacific

But the training and military cooperation with other countries in the region is certainly picking up.

Analysis | Military Industrial Complex

Late last month, Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen confirmed the presence of U.S. troops on the island in the wake of a Wall Street Journal report that U.S. Special Operations forces and Marines were “secretly operating” in her country.

While the Journal reported that U.S. commandos were there to train local forces as “part of efforts to shore up the island’s defenses as concern regarding potential Chinese aggression mounts,” Gen. Richard D. Clarke, the chief of U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM), demurred when asked about Tsai’s comments and the U.S. presence.

Taiwan was, in fact, absent from an official list, provided by SOCOM to Responsible Statecraft, of countries that saw deployments of U.S. commandos in 2021. But Special Operations Command did admit to involvement in 10 other nations in the Indo-Pacific region, including Australia, India, Japan, South Korea, the Maldives, Mongolia, Palau, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand.

For years, the Pentagon has been shifting its focus from counterterrorism to “great power competition” with “near-peer competitors” like China.  The Biden administration has also been outspoken about the threat posed by the People’s Republic.  “China is a challenge to our security, to our prosperity, to our values," according to Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines. “We're focused on our effort to counter the challenge posed by China," charged Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin. And CIA Director William Burns told members of Congress earlier this year: “An adversarial, predatory Chinese leadership poses our biggest geo-political test.” 

This has not resulted, however, in large scale deployments of U.S. commandos to Asia. The Indo-Pacific region saw only the fourth largest contingent of U.S. Special Operations forces (SOF) sent abroad in 2021. Roughly 9 percent of U.S. commandos deployed overseas this year were sent to the region, just below the number deployed to Europe and significantly fewer than those operating in the Greater Middle East and Africa.  This is the same percentage as in 2010, a year before President Barack Obama announced what became known as the “pivot to Asia.”   

Still, Clarke says that special operators will be key to America’s military response to China. “As the U.S. seeks to reinvigorate and modernize our alliances and partnerships to counter China… SOF will play a central role,” he told members of the Senate Armed Services Committee earlier this year.  In September, for example, U.S. Naval Special Warfare operators and Indian Navy Marine Commandos, took part in MALABAR 21, a largely maritime exercise which includes a “high-end tactical training,” including land-based urban combat scenarios.  

“Whether we’re training together in exercises, or cooperating in many other areas, our relationship with India is strong and continues to grow,” said Clarke, during a summer visit to that country to discuss ways to, according to the U.S. embassy, “improve defense partnerships and grow interoperability.”

Last month, Clarke also praised allied Philippine troops. “Our SOF have been at work with our closest allies and partners since 2001. It’s important.  It’s the only named operation in all of the Indo-Pacific, with Operation Pacific Eagle, with an ally and a trusted partner,” he said, referring to Operation Pacific Eagle–Philippines, a counterterrorism campaign aimed at Islamic State affiliates and other “priority violent extremist organizations in the Philippines.”

Clarke also mentioned a visit to the country and said that American special operators “were there as a partner of choice” and were “leading with our values.” But his high opinion of Philippine troops isn’t shared by all elements of the U.S. government. Earlier this year, the U.S. State Department weighed in on those allies detailing “significant human rights issues” including reports of unlawful or arbitrary killings, including extrajudicial executions, as well as torture by Philippine security forces.  Last month, Michelle Bachelet, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, similarly stated that she “remained disturbed by reports of continuing and severe human rights violations and abuses” by Philippine personnel.

But with China deemed a “pacing threat” by the Biden administration and deployments of special operators to the region holding steady for the last decade, it’s unlikely that human rights abuses by partners in the Philippines or elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific will impact U.S. deployments of commandos for the foreseeable future.


A Special Forces Soldier conducts Security Assistance Training for members of the Philippine Army's 1st Infantry (TABAK) Division on March 20, 2003. (DoD photo)
Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
US capitol building washington DC
Top image credit: U.S Capitol Building, Washington, DC. (Bill Perry /shutterstock)

Congress moves to put the brakes on Trump's unilateral bombing

Washington Politics

As a fragile ceasefire takes hold between Israel, Iran, and the United States, many questions remain.

With Iran’s nuclear program unquestionably damaged but likely not fully destroyed, will the Iranian government now race towards a bomb? Having repeatedly broken recent ceasefires in Lebanon and Gaza, will Prime Minister Netanyahu honor this one? And after having twice taken direct military action against Iran, will President Trump pursue the peace he claims to seek or once again choose war?

keep readingShow less
Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Ira
Top photo credit: Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Iran speaking at an event hosted by the Center for Political Thought & Leadership at Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona. (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

Israeli-fueled fantasy to bring back Shah has absolutely no juice

Middle East

The Middle East is a region where history rarely repeats itself exactly, but often rhymes in ways that are both tragic and absurd.

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the current Israeli campaign against Iran. A campaign that, beneath its stated aims of dismantling Iran's nuclear and defense capabilities, harbors a deeper, more outlandish ambition: the hope that toppling the regime could install a friendly government under Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran's last Shah. Perhaps even paving the way for a monarchical restoration.

This is not a policy officially declared in Jerusalem or Washington, but it lingers in the background of Israel’s actions and its overt calls for Iranians to “stand up” to the Islamic Republic. In April 2023, Pahlavi was hosted in Israel by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Isaac Herzog.

During the carefully choreographed visit, he prayed at the Western Wall, while avoiding the Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount just above and made no effort to meet with Palestinian leaders. An analysis from the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs described the trip as a message that Israel recognizes Pahlavi as "the main leader of the Iranian opposition."

Figures like Gila Gamliel, a former minister of intelligence in the Israeli government, have openly called for regime change, declaring last year that a "window of opportunity has opened to overthrow the regime."

What might have been dismissed as a diplomatic gambit has, in the context of the current air war, been elevated into a strategic bet that military pressure can create the conditions for a political outcome of Israel's choosing.

The irony is hard to overstate. It was foreign intervention that set the stage for the current enmity. In 1953, a CIA/MI6 coup overthrew Mohammad Mossadegh, Iran’s last democratically elected leader. While the plot was triggered by his nationalization of the British-controlled Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, the United States joined out of Cold War paranoia, fearing the crisis would allow Iran's powerful communist party to seize power and align the country with the Soviet Union.

keep readingShow less
Emmanuel Macron,  Keir Starmer, Friedrich Merz
Top image credit: TIRANA, ALBANIA - MAY 16: France's President Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz speak during a Ukraine security meeting at the 6th European Political Community summit on May 16, 2025 at Skanderbeg Square in Tirana, Albania. Leon Neal/Pool via REUTERS

The EU's pathetic response to Trump's Iran attack

Middle East

The European Union’s response to the U.S. strikes on Iran Saturday has exposed more than just hypocrisy — it has revealed a vassalization so profound that the European capitals now willingly undermine both international law and their own strategic interests.

The statement by the E3, signed by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and French President Emmanuel Macron, following similar statements by the president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, and its high representative for foreign affairs Kaja Kallas, perfectly encapsulates this surrender.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.