Follow us on social

google cta
Masters-thiel

Meet Peter Thiel's military industrial candidate

With $10 million of his boss's money, Blake Masters could win the Senate and secure business for their border security and weapons investments.

Analysis | North America
google cta
google cta

On Monday, Blake Masters announced he is challenging Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) for his Senate seat on Twitter with a campaign commercial portraying himself as a working class hero pushing back against corporate and political elites who have sold out everyday Americans. 

“We are up against a media that lies to us, schools that teach our kids to hate our country, and corporations that have gotten so big, they think they’re bigger than America,” said Masters, who also warns that generals “prioritize social issues like transgenderism in the enlisted ranks over actually winning wars.” Meanwhile, he’s promoting a foreign policy that is “tough on actual threats like China.”

But Masters, who is running as a Republican, has crafted a political persona and campaign that also stands to financially benefit his employer and top campaign funder, Peter Thiel, who contributed $10 million to a super PAC supporting Masters’ candidacy.

Masters works directly for Thiel, serving as chief operating officer of Thiel Capital —Thiel’s investment firm — and the Thiel Foundation. His campaign website prominently promotes issues that would directly benefit Thiel’s investments in border security technology and defense contractors with an eye to a cold war-style competition with China.

“We need to completely end illegal immigration using every tool at hand: physical walls, surveillance technology, thousands more border patrol agents, and mandatory E-Verify for employers,” says Masters’ campaign website.

Steering federal contracts to various border security measures would create a nice synergy with Thiel’s investments. Thiel’s Founder’s Fund is invested in the border and military surveillance company Anduril, valuing the company at $1 billion,” notes The Verge.

Anduril has extensive contracts with the Department of Defense, but its first government contracts were with the border patrol to put up as many as 200 autonomous surveillance towers. This was aa “program of record” with the Customs and Border Protection, meaning “it’s essential enough to have a dedicated line of funding from Congress, and that towers would operate 24 hours a day, independent of the electrical grid,” according to Bloomberg. Last September, Anduril secured a $36 million contract from Customs and Border Protection following a $25 million contract the previous July,  part of an ongoing contract worth more than $200 million.  

And that isn’t Thiel’s only investment that profits off a highly militarized and highly surveilled southern border. Palantir Technologies, a $20 billion data-analytics firm founded by Thiel, has ongoing contracts with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for technology including software used in support of the Trump administration’s controversial detention, deportation, and family-separation policies.  

On the foreign policy front, Thiel and Masters are well positioned to profit from an increasingly hostile U.S.-China relationship. Anduril’s founder, Palmer Luckey, heavily focuses on securing contracts with the Department of Defense and blasts fellow tech executives for being wary about partnering with the military, particularly on projects that could fan the flames of tensions with Beijing.

"China has done an incredible job of using the blocking of access to their markets as a tool to get the culture of western democracies to subvert itself to China," said Luckey in December.

"They don't have to come after us militarily,” he added. “They don't have to cut our networks. All they have to do is invest in our companies, do partnerships with our companies... and then everybody bends over for them.”

On Twitter, Luckey is even more outspoken, warning that China and Russia are “expansionist powers hell-bent on consuming democratic nations near and far.”

Masters and his employer have a clear profit incentive to steer taxpayer funds to high-tech border surveillance and push for military competition with China, even while embracing populist positions like, “American people have made clear that we need to end our pointless interventions abroad and focus on our problems at home.”

Unfortunately, Masters’ professional career appears to be deeply intertwined with hyping the threat on the U.S.-Mexico border and from Beijing, and his employer and campaign funder, Peter Thiel, has a huge financial incentive to secure public funds for AI, drones and border security contracts, placing both of them at the nexus of a new branch of the military industrial complex with ties to AI, Silicon Valley and high-technology.

Thiel, it seems, has found the perfect candidate to advance his taxpayer funded business interests.


Arizona Senate candidate Blake Masters in his You Tube campaign launch (You Tube) and billionaire Peter Thiel (Demo Conference/Stephen Brashear/Flickr/ Creative Commons
google cta
Analysis | North America
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
Despite ban, pernicious military 'earmarks' are back in the billions
Top image credit: Roman Samborski via shutterstock.com
Popular YouTuber discovers how corrupt the Pentagon budget is

Despite ban, pernicious military 'earmarks' are back in the billions

Military Industrial Complex

A new report finds that lawmakers added nearly $34 billion to the Pentagon’s procurement and research accounts for FY2026, through 1,090 individual program increases, many of which the Defense Department did not even request funds for.

Although individual program increases are not earmarks, they serve a similar function. Formal earmarks themselves were temporarily banned in 2011 to curb lawmaker-driven runaway spending, then reintroduced in 2021 by Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) as “Community Project Funding,” and “Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS)” in the House and Senate respectively — and subject to transparency requirements, where lawmakers must associate themselves with the earmarks they propose.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.