Follow us on social

google cta
Navy-funeral

Why are tens of thousands of post-9/11 service members killing themselves?

A new study finds a disturbing trend. This military wife and mother says families aren't always getting the help they need.

Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
google cta
google cta

I am an Air Force wife. My husband has struggled with suicidal ideation and depression. So when I read Brown University’s recent Costs of War report on post-9/11 suicide rates among the military, I found the data tragic -- but not unsurprising. 

More military-affiliated individuals have died by suicide than have been killed in post-9/11 operations. Military members have largely shouldered the burden of this war, and the cost of that trauma has been great. The suicide rate among this demographic is now higher than the civilian rate, and this is especially concerning because the rate for military members has been lower historically than civilian counterparts, as noted by the study. 

According to Brown University, more post-9/11 service members and war veterans have died by suicide than in combat. “An estimated 30,177 have died by suicide as compared with the 7,057 killed in post 9/11 war operations.” The ripple effect of those who have been impacted by these horrible deaths number many times more. 

While the Department of Defense, Veterans’ Administration, and other organizations are trying to address this alarming trend, one component that must be further integrated and supported is the family. Depression and suicide do not happen in a vacuum, and these events have a profound impact on those in the service member or veteran’s life. 

Military service members, war veterans, and their families carry the costs of war daily. Most civilians in our country have been fortunate to not have experienced, at least directly, the horror of the Global War on Terror. But many U.S. servicemembers — especially those who have done multiple tours of duty — have. Traumatic events like IED blasts (with accompanying traumatic brain injury) carry significant impact even after a deployment ends and service members return to American soil. This can lead to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. The Rand Corporation, in a 2019 report entitled Improving the Quality of Mental Health Care for Veterans, identified that up to 20 percent of deployed individuals experience PTSD, up to 44 percent have a dependency on alcohol, and 48 percent of those who deployed experienced strains in family life.

All of these are factors for suicide. War leaves those involved forever changed, and in some ways it feels like those of us who had a front row seat will forever be picking up the pieces of what used to be. 

Even knowing that my husband struggled with suicidality left me with significant trauma. The what-ifs and what-could-have-beens still haunt me, and I am well aware that my family remains in a high risk category. There were, and sometimes still are, days where I did not know what I would or would not come home to. The helplessness of knowing that someone I love wanted to die as badly as he did could be overwhelming. It took a toll on me, and some days it still does.

I was fortunate in that my husband sought significant and intensive treatment. Even with that treatment, though, my family did not receive support from healthcare providers or the military. I believe that it is essential for all parties to be directly connected with the treatment team for the healing process of the wounded individual. It is very easy and oftentimes necessary to focus on the struggling individual, but at the same time there are others impacted by this depression or suicide attempt who also need help navigating these choppy waters. 

One barrier for supporting and treating war ravaged individuals is a shortage of military and VA mental health providers. The military is struggling to fill mental health job vacancies and provide care to members. The Rand Corporation noted in their aforementioned report that the VA is also struggling to fill shortages. 

Another major barrier for seeking treatment is stigma. The Brown University report noted, “In general, veterans tend to have a stigma against mental health care and tend to match the general public’s negative view of those who seek help as dangerous and worthy of social avoidance. A retired Marine officer revealed to me that he has actively avoided the diagnosis while suspecting he has PTSD. He said, “No matter what, when you go, and you spend a year in a combat zone or wherever, your mind works in a different way, and even if you’re in a combat zone, but you’re not involved in combat, your mind works in a different way.” 

He felt it was better to look resilient and strong than to look like the persistent stereotype of a mentally broken veteran. Stigma seems to be ingrained in military culture and carries over even after a military member leaves the service, regardless of whether the member served on a front line or as a support to the war. Even those who did not directly see battle still come home changed. 

Allocating additional funding specifically for more mental health practitioners and programs can help these barriers be reduced. The 2021 VA budget allocated $10.3 billion for mental health services and $312 million for suicide prevention outreach. The DoD has a $50.8 billion budget to fund the Military Health System, with $30.7 million earmarked for unit-based mental health and physical therapy providers. But is it getting to who really did it? Is it putting the right people in place to treat the incoming need?

For example, advocate Abbie Bennet noted in 2019 that “with 50 percent of psychiatrists across the country operating cash-only private practices (which do not take insurance), many make $300,000 to $400,000 per year and have little financial incentive to work for the military.” Psychiatrists that work for the government earn “at best 20 percent less,” the report shows. 

This scenario is similar to the VA and is not limited to psychiatrists. Crafting initiatives and incentivizing programs that change the culture of the military and the VA are imperative to meeting the needs of these suffering military members, veterans, and their families. Another article detailed that a DoD Inspector General report in August 2020 found “patients seeking outpatient mental health treatment often experienced delays (up to 79 days) or never obtained care at all due to inconsistencies in standards, inadequate staffing, outdated provider information and other shortcomings in the military’s health system.” 

Reducing red tape and increasing access to these programs by recruiting and retaining effective therapists is essential for the wellbeing of those who fought for us and those of us who care for them when they come back. Furthermore, funding and supporting nonprofits that care for and support these individuals is also important and can continue to decrease stigma.  

Losing four times as many military and war veterans to suicide than died in combat is heartbreaking. These lives were unnecessarily lost for a multitude of preventable reasons. There are many factors that do and could contribute to someone wanting to take their own life. As the Brown study identified, suicide rates in the military have typically been lower than civillian counterparts, but the previously protective nature of military service in regards to suicidality now seems to be a liability.

Our country owes a debt of gratitude to those who shouldered the burden of war, and it is time to help them and their families carry the load. 


United States Navy sailor at a veteran's funeral at VA National Cemetery in Florida, 2014. (wollertz/shutterstock)
google cta
Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi
Top photo credit: Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi 首相官邸 (Cabinet Public Affairs Office)

Takaichi 101: How to torpedo relations with China in a month

Asia-Pacific

On November 7, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi stated that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could undoubtedly be “a situation that threatens Japan’s survival,” thereby implying that Tokyo could respond by dispatching Self-Defense Forces.

This statement triggered the worst crisis in Sino-Japanese relations in over a decade because it reflected a transformation in Japan’s security policy discourse, defense posture, and U.S.-Japan defense cooperation in recent years. Understanding this transformation requires dissecting the context as well as content of Takaichi’s parliamentary remarks.

keep readingShow less
Starmer, Macron, Merz G7
Top photo credit: Prime Minister Keir Starmer meets Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and António Costa, President of the European Council at the G7 world leaders summit in Kananaskis, June 15, 2025. Picture by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street

The Europeans pushing the NATO poison pill

Europe

The recent flurry of diplomatic activity surrounding Ukraine has revealed a stark transatlantic divide. While high level American and Ukrainian officials have been negotiating the U.S. peace plan in Geneva, European powers have been scrambling to influence a process from which they risk being sidelined.

While Europe has to be eventually involved in a settlement of the biggest war on its territory after World War II, so far it’s been acting more like a spoiler than a constructive player.

keep readingShow less
Sudan
Top image credit: A Sudanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed combat vehicle as Sudan's army retakes ground and some displaced residents return to ravaged capital in the state of Khartoum Sudan March 26, 2025. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig
Will Sudan attack the UAE?

Saudi leans in hard to get UAE out of Sudan civil war

Middle East

As Saudi Arabia’s powerful crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), swept through Washington last week, the agenda was predictably packed with deals: a trillion-dollar investment pledge, access to advanced F-35 fighter jets, and coveted American AI technology dominated the headlines. Yet tucked within these transactions was a significant development for the civil war in Sudan.

Speaking at the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum President Donald Trump said that Sudan “was not on my charts,” viewing the conflict as “just something that was crazy and out of control” until the Saudi leader pressed the issue. “His majesty would like me to do something very powerful having to do with Sudan,” Trump recounted, adding that MBS framed it as an opportunity for greatness.

The crown prince’s intervention highlights a crucial new reality that the path to peace, or continued war, in Sudan now runs even more directly through the escalating rivalry between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The fate of Sudan is being forged in the Gulf, and its future will be decided by which side has more sway in Trump’s White House.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.