Follow us on social

Shutterstock_733118560-scaled

Activist confronts defense industry CEO for company’s role in war crimes

In response, General Dynamics CEO Phebe Novakovic offered no evidence to refute the claims.

Reporting | Military Industrial Complex

An anti-war activist confronted General Dynamics CEO Phebe Novakovic on Wednesday during the company’s shareholders’ meeting, accusing the defense industry giant of profiting off war crimes and arming repressive, undemocratic regimes without “moral reflection.” 

“I appreciate the care you’ve taken to keep us safe during COVID,” CODEPINK co-founder Medea Benjamin told General Dynamics’ board, which included Novakovic and former Defense Secretary James Mattis. “But,” she added, “I wonder about the care that this company takes to keep people safe from the bombs and the other weapons that you produce that kill innocent people around the world.” 

Benjamin then listed off a handful of instances in which General Dynamics’ products were involved in gross human rights abuses and civilian deaths during war, including a marketplace bombing in Yemen in 2016 that killed nearly 100 civilians, including 25 children, and former President Trump’s child separation policy at the U.S. southern border. 

“I also know that you sell weapons, we, this company, sells weapons to the most repressive dictatorships in the world like Saudi Arabia, like the United Arab Emirates, like Bahrain and provides, through the U.S. Pentagon, weapons to the repressive government of Egypt,” Benjamin said, later adding, “if you have a model where you need global conflict, where you need wars to be able to make money I think there’s something fundamentally wrong with this company and you ought to have some more moral reflection about how you earn your billions of dollars.” 

“I’m going to presume that you are a person of good faith,” Novakovic responded, claiming that “some of the potentially libelous and incorrect information that you have communicated is born out of lack of knowledge.” 

The General Dynamics CEO — whose total compensation has averaged over $21 million annually since 2014 — later said that Benjamin’s assertions about the company’s involvement in the 2016 Yemen bombing and Trump’s border child separation policy were incorrect. 

“The internet is full of misinformation, including the incident you cited in the marketplace and including the caging of children,” she said.

Yet Human Rights Watch investigated the aftermath of the 2016 bombing at the Yemen marketplace and “found remnants at the market of a GBU-31 satellite-guided bomb, which consists of a US-supplied MK-84 2,000-pound bomb mated with a JDAM satellite guidance kit, also US-supplied.” General Dynamics sells the MK-80 series bombs

In a separate incident not mentioned during Wednesday’s exchange between Benjamin and Novakovic, munitions remnants from a 2018 Saudi-coaltion airstrike site in Yemen that killed 40 children and wounded dozens more contained “markings visible on a guidance fin for a GBU-12 Paveway II bomb [that] show it was produced at a General Dynamics Corporation facility in Garland, Texas.” Human Rights Watch said it could not confirm the remnants were found near the site, but that “the relative homogeneity of the fragments in thickness as well as condition, with no weathering or discoloration apparent, and the images of damage from the attack, are consistent with the detonation of a large impact-fuzed aerial bomb.”

And General Dynamics was in fact “involved,” as Benjamin put it, in Trump’s child separation policy, as a subsidiary of the company served “as a facilitator in aiding ‘unaccompanied minors’ illegally crossing the US-Mexico border, including children caught up in President Trump’s ‘zero tolerance’ policy of separating families.”

Also during the exchange, Novakovic said, “when you think about death and you think about destruction, we hope for peace, we pray for peace, we work for peace.” Yet just last week, she said that the potential of the world becoming more dangerous was producing a “nice cadence continuing in terms of our orders.”

The Center for International Policy issued a report this week which found that the economic calamities associated with the COVID-19 pandemic had no effect on compensation for the defense industry’s top five corporations, including General Dynamics, with these CEOs raking in more than a combined $150 million in 2020, and more than $1 billion since 2017.

A transcript of the exchange between Benjamin and Novakovic can be found here

Image: Casimiro PT via shutterstock.com
Reporting | Military Industrial Complex
Why American war and election news coverage is so rotten
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. | Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. speaking wit… | Flickr

Why American war and election news coverage is so rotten

Media


Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.”

keep readingShow less
Peter Thiel: 'I defer to Israel'

Peter Thiel attends the annual Allen and Co. Sun Valley Media Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, U.S., July 6, 2022. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Peter Thiel: 'I defer to Israel'

QiOSK

The trouble with doing business with Israel — or any foreign government — is you can't really say anything when they do terrible things with technology that you may or may not have sold to them, or hope to sell to them, or hope to sell in your own country.

Such was the case with Peter Thiel, co-founder of Palantir Technologies, in this recently surfaced video, talking to the Cambridge Union back in May. See him stumble and stutter and buy time when asked what he thought about the use of Artificial Intelligence by the Israeli military in a targeting program called "Lavender" — which we now know has been responsible for the deaths of an untold number of innocent Palestinians since Oct 7. (See investigation here).

keep readingShow less
Are budget boosters actually breaking the military?

Committee chairman Jack Reed (D-RI), left, looks on as co-chair Roger Wicker (R-MS) shakes hands with U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin before a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on President Biden's proposed budget request for the Department of Defense on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., April 9, 2024. REUTERS/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades

Are budget boosters actually breaking the military?

Military Industrial Complex

Now that both political parties have seemingly settled upon their respective candidates for the 2024 presidential election, we have an opportune moment to ask a rather fundamental question about our nation’s defense spending: how much is enough?

Back in May, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, penned an op-ed in the New York Times insisting the answer was not enough at all. Wicker claimed that the nation wasn’t prepared for war — or peace, for that matter — that our ships and fighter-jet fleets were “dangerously small” and our military infrastructure “outdated.” So weak our defense establishment and so dangerous the world right now, Wicker pressed, the nation ought to “spend an additional $55 billion on the military in the 2025 fiscal year.”

keep readingShow less

Israel-Gaza Crisis

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.