Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1721086540-scaled

Fighting locust swarms is a regional matter

Without more international funding, the impact of the locusts across the Horn of Africa, Middle East, and South Asia — on top of the COVID-19 pandemic — is going to be catastrophic.

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

A locust outbreak, the worst in recent decades, is threatening millions of hectares of land in eight countries across the Horn of Africa, Middle East, and South Asia. As with pandemics, plagues like these cannot be managed without regional and international cooperation since they have no regard for national borders.

Southeastern Iran has been experiencing locust swarms every year and authorities there do prepare for infestations. However, according to Keith Cressman — senior locust forecaster for the United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) — this year swarms invaded the southwest of the country, where seasonal rains came early.

Iranian Ambassador to Pakistan Seyed Mohammad Ali Hosseini wrote recently that the issue of locust swarms should be dealt with regionally. In an article entitled, “The challenge to food security: a new agenda for regional cooperation,” he warned that “If Iran is not able to control the pests, Pakistan will also be damaged.”

Months of rain in East Africa and Southwest Asia, including Iran, provided the perfect environment for the desert locust to breed. Southern parts of Iran witnessed locust swarms arriving mostly from India and Pakistan.

The bigger the swarms, the more devastating the impact. Even a small swarm containing 40 million locusts can consume an amount of food sufficient to feed 35,000 people in just one day. Considering the distance the insects can travel — roughly 100 miles per day — any swarm should be considered a regional threat.

A report by the U.N. World Food Program (WFP) indicates that a second wave of swarming locusts will leave tens of millions of people in a state of food insecurity. WFP Executive Director David Beasley warned the United Nations Security Council in mid-April that urgent actions are needed to prevent “multiple famines of biblical proportions.” Beasley repeated that warning at a virtual event at the Atlantic Council on May 8.

The interaction of the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change, civil conflicts and locust invasions is devastating to regional food production and distribution. Regional and international cooperation is vital to meet the challenge. Unfortunately, travel restrictions aimed at preventing COVID-19’s spread have hampered measures to combat locust swarms across ten countries. In some countries, pest control workers have even been unable to go outside to spray pesticide. These restrictions are beginning to loosen, but there is still a shortage of necessary chemicals due to the disruption of supply chains.

Similar problems exist in the South Asia region. According to Hosseini, the COVID-19 pandemic has prevented meetings between Iranian and Pakistani teams to discuss cooperation in fighting the locusts. A global recession, spurred by lockdowns imposed to contain the pandemic, is also hampering the collection of necessary funds to deal with the swarms.

Sanctions is also slowing the fight against locusts. Referring to the impact of sanctions imposed by the U.S. on Iran, Hosseini wrote: “Crippling sanctions against Iran have drastically reduced resources that were supposed to be allocated to the desert locust problem.”

Sanctions, in conjunction with the pandemic, are weakening Iran’s economy and making it more difficult for the country to import necessary effective chemicals to kill the locusts. Lacking access to appropriate chemicals, “they sprayed whatever they had, often mixing large quantities of water with other pesticides in a desert region that is already struggling with drought,” Cressman said.

Regional conflicts also impede an effective response. In 1979, locust management cooperation between Iran and Pakistan was disrupted due to the Iranian revolution. The collaboration eventually resumed in the 1990s with help of the FAO. However, in Yemen, one of the major frontiers for the locusts, the program to fight them is hampered because its cities are under control of warring factions. The situation is particularly dire because of flooding and heavy rain, which are the perfect hatching ground for swarms expected to move in Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, and Sudan in mid-June.

In many parts of the world that go through the devastation of locust swarms, people struggling with food shortages eat the locusts and/or use them as animal feed. A famous poem by the Iranian 12th -century poet Saadi Shirazi describes starvation due to catastrophic locust swarms: “Like beggars, the trees stood leafless, and the mountains lost their verdure. The locusts devoured the gardens, and men devoured the locusts.”

However, today people are strongly warned against eating locusts since different kinds of pesticides and insect funguses used to fight the swarms can make the insects highly toxic. For that matter, the aerial pesticide spraying that has been performed across ten countries also has a neurotoxic effect on both humans and their livestock.

The outlook is not unremittingly bleak, however. The FAO Commission for Controlling the Desert Locust in South-West Asia (SWAC) — an early warning and prevention system — was established in 1964 and consists of Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, and India. Regional cooperation goes back even earlier, to 1942, when an Indian delegation helped Iran in its fight against locusts. The FAO puts all data online so countries can coordinate and target breeding sites for pesticide spraying.

Even rivals India and Pakistan have collaborated in the fight against locust swarms. During a time of high tension over Kashmir in 2019, when all other activities between the two countries, including communications and trade, were on hold, dialogue over fighting locusts continued.

Still, without more international funding, the impact of the locusts on top of the COVID-19 pandemic is going to be catastrophic. As Beasley said, “economic sanctions can prevent or slow down this fight. Time is not on our side, so let’s act wisely — and let’s act fast.”


People in Burdwan Town, West Bengal/India stand in line to collect food grains at a ration shop during the lockdown period due to COVID-19 outbreak (Photo credit: Sanjoy Karmakar / Shutterstock.com)
google cta
Analysis | Middle East
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
Alternative vs. legacy media
Top photo credit: Gemini AI

Ding dong the legacy media and its slavish war reporting is dead

Media

In a major development that must be frustrating to an establishment trying to sell their policies to an increasingly skeptical public, the rising popularity of independent media has made it impossible to create broad consensus for corporate-compliant narratives, and to casually denigrate, or even censor, those who disagree.

It’s been a long road.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.