Follow us on social

google cta
tim kaine war powers

Finally: Senators vote to block military action in Venezuela

Body moved to discharge War Powers Resolution today, moving to a full chamber vote.

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

After a U.S. military operation to remove Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro from Venezuela, the U.S. Senate has narrowly advanced a War Powers Resolution to block the use of military force against the country.

The resolution, sponsored by Sen. Tim Kaine (D.-Va), passed a motion to discharge from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in a 52-47 vote, largely along party lines. Republicans largely voted against the resolution, and Democrats were unanimous in voting for it.

But it needed GOP lawmakers to pass. Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Todd Young (R- Ind.), Rand Paul (R.-Ky.), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), and Lisa Murkowski (R-Ala.) sent it over the top. If the final full Senate vote falls along the same lines, it will mark the first time since 2020 that the Senate has moved to restrict the president’s ability to use force abroad.

Before the vote, resolution supporters stressed Congress must assert its authority to decide when to go to war.

“If we do not assert these powers, if we don't stand up, not just for our branch of government, but for the American people, there is no telling and no stopping what comes next, because the administration has made it clear that Venezuela is the opening salvo,” Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said.

“Will it be Cuba next, or Colombia or Mexico or Greenland, for crying out loud? This is the moment where we need to stand up and exercise our power as part of the government that is closest to the people, to make it clear that no president can commit our military forces absent an attack on our country or imminent threat of invasion without the approval of Congress,” Schiff said.

“Congress exists to provide oversight and scrutiny of the executive branch, not to cheer from the side lines. I commend our servicemen for their performance last weekend, but I am deeply concerned by the Trump administration's lack of serious planning for the next phase,” Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) said. “That is why this war powers resolution is necessary. The Constitution divests the power to authorize war in Congress, not the president."

Some also spoke about the risks the operations pose to the nation’s armed service members.

“Whether you go in trying to do a limited military operation or not, at the end of the day, it’s American sons and daughters from places like Michigan that are called up to create calm, to create stability,” Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) said on the Senate floor yesterday. “This Administration has been very open about the fact that they now believe they own Venezuela.”

Recent War Powers Resolutions either to block hostilities against Venezuela, or against the so-called “narcoterrorist” boats the U.S. has been striking around the Caribbean since September, have failed.


Top photo credit: Sen. Kaine speaks ahead of vote on War Powers Resolution/WFXR News [YouTube/Screenshot]
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Why SCOTUS won’t deter Trump’s desire to weaponize trade
Top image credit: U.S. President Donald Trump talks to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts on the day of his speech to a joint session of Congress, in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., March 4, 2025. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

Why SCOTUS won’t deter Trump’s desire to weaponize trade

QiOSK

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court today ruled against the White House on a key economic initiative of the Trump administration, concluding that the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give the president the right to impose tariffs.

The ruling was not really a surprise; the tone of the questioning by several justices in early November was overwhelmingly skeptical of the administration’s argument, as prediction markets rightly concluded. Given the likelihood of this result, it should also come as no surprise that the Trump administration has already been plotting ways to work around the decision.

keep readingShow less
Trump Iran
Top image credit: Lucas Parker and FotoField via shutterstock.com

No, even a 'small attack' on Iran will lead to war

QiOSK

The Wall Street Journal reports that President Donald Trump is considering a small attack to force Iran to agree to his nuclear deal, and if Tehran refuses, escalate the attacks until Iran either agrees or the regime falls.

Here’s why this won’t work.

keep readingShow less
As Iran strikes loom, US and UK fight over Indian Ocean base
TOP IMAGE CREDIT: An aerial view of Diego Garcia, the Chagossian Island home to one of the U.S. military's 750 worldwide bases. The UK handed sovereignty of the islands back to Mauritius, with the stipulation that the U.S. must be allowed to continue its base's operation on Diego Garcia for the next 99 years. (Kev1ar82 / Shutterstock.com).

As Iran strikes loom, US and UK fight over Indian Ocean base

QiOSK

As the U.S. surges troops to the Middle East, a battle is brewing over a strategically significant American base in the middle of the Indian Ocean.

President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that he would oppose any effort to return the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, arguing that a U.S. base on the island of Diego Garcia may be necessary to “eradicate a potential attack by a highly unstable and dangerous [Iranian] Regime.” The comment came just a day after the State Department reiterated its support for the U.K.’s decision to give up sovereignty over the islands while maintaining a 99-year lease for the base.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.