Follow us on social

google cta
3 US troops killed by drone attack in Jordan

3 US troops killed by drone attack in Jordan

President Biden says America's 'heart is heavy,' vows to continue the fight against Iran-backed militant groups

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Editor's note: Last updated at 8:10 p.m.

Three American troops were killed in a drone attack in Jordan near the Syria border on Sunday, leading to calls for retaliation against Iran and fears of greater escalation in the broader, brewing war in the Middle East.

From President Joe Biden today:

Today, America’s heart is heavy. Last night, three U.S. service members were killed — and many wounded — during an unmanned aerial drone attack on our forces stationed in northeast Jordan near the Syria border. While we are still gathering the facts of this attack, we know it was carried out by radical Iran-backed militant groups operating in Syria and Iraq.

Jill and I join the families and friends of our fallen—and Americans across the country—in grieving the loss of these warriors in this despicable and wholly unjust attack. These service members embodied the very best of our nation: Unwavering in their bravery. Unflinching in their duty. Unbending in their commitment to our country— risking their own safety for the safety of their fellow Americans, and our allies and partners with whom we stand in the fight against terrorism. It is a fight we will not cease.

According to the Pentagon, the attack occurred on a small outpost called Tower 22 in northeast Jordan and at least 34 were injured. A Sunday night update by CENTCOM said there are 350 U.S. Air Force and Army personnel deployed to the Tower 22 base, where they "conduct a number of key support functions, including support to the coalition for the the lasting defeat of ISIS."

Earlier on Sunday, Jordanian officials said the attack occurred in Syria, not in Jordan. The U.S. maintains that the strike hit in Jordan.

Meanwhile, the Washington Post has reported that a senior official with the Islamic Resistance in Iraq — an umbrella group that includes Kataib Hezbollah, Nujaba, and other Iran-backed militants — claimed responsibility for the attack in a statement to the paper, "on the condition of anonymity in line with rules set by the group."

“As we said before, if the U.S. keeps supporting Israel, there will escalations. All the U.S. interests in the region are legitimate targets and we don’t care about U.S. threats to respond, we know the direction we are taking and martyrdom is our prize,” the Islamic Resistance in Iraq official said.

The U.S. military has been fending off, and retaliating against, numerous attacks by Iranian-backed militants in Iraq and Syria for several years. They only increased in number — over 130 — after the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks and ensuing Israeli war in Gaza. Most of the rocket, drone, and ballistic missiles had been thwarted by U.S. defenses, and there have been few injuries limited to service members being treated for traumatic brain injuries and returned to the job. The Pentagon reported that Chief Warrant Officer 4 Garrett Illerbrunn from the 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade was critically injured in a Christmas Day in a drone attack on Erbil Airbase in Northern Iraq. According to CNN he was sent back to the U.S. for further treatment.

There are currently around 900 U.S. service members stationed in Syria and 1500 in Iraq for ongoing counterterrorism operations. Critics say without a clear strategy or justification for being there, they have been increasingly put in harm's way. "There will be understandable calls for revenge and counterstrikes. Biden will almost certainly go down that path. Know that this is how America gets dragged into endless war," said the Quincy Institute's Trita Parsi.

"Retaliations, which in the moment, may feel justified by the unacceptable attacks of these militias, put us on a path toward a war that doesn’t serve our interests and that we cannot afford— and one whose victory we cannot define and whose exit we cannot envision."

More from the Quincy Institute's Adam Weinstein: "POTUS & Congress need to ask WHY we are accepting this risk to US life? How does it benefit the US? It clearly doesn't," he posted on X shortly after the news broke Sunday. "There will be calls for revenge, escalation & reestablishing deterrence. If US troops devolve into a permanent lightning rod for unaccountable militias, nobody benefits except the militias."

Dan DePetris of Defense Priorities tells RS: "The U.S. will eventually retaliate to this attack. But any counterstrikes will be a short-term measure. The only antidote to more casualties in the future is to leave Syria entirely.”

(Ret.) Lt. Col. Daniel Davis responded to many of the calls for a quick, hard strike against Iran on Sunday. "I have strenuously argued that we need to reposition those troops elsewhere in the Middle East, where they’re not so vulnerable and easy targets for Iran," he said. "Now the thing I warned about has happened, and everybody wants to make a large strike on Iran itself, which will only inflame the situation further. Almost no one is thinking about What Comes Next?"

Dan Caldwell, Iraq Veteran and former congressional staffer, has been arguing for U.S troops to come home for years, pointing out that they do not have a clear mission, particularly after the Syria war did not end in the regime change but left Syria's Bashar Assad in power, dueling factions, refugee camps, and foreign footprints (including U.S., Iran, and Russia) in place.

"Those who run our foreign policy — both civilian and military — cling to the delusion that there is something positive to salvage from the wreckage of American policy in Iraq and Syria," he told RS. "They are content to feed some of our best to the meat grinder to maintain that fantasy."

U.S. Central Command said as "a matter of respect for the families and in accordance with DoD policy, the identities of the servicemembers will be withheld until 24 hours after their next of kin have been notified. Updates will be provided as they become available."


This story is developing


shutterstock/KajzrPhotography

google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
china trump
President Donald Trump announces the creation of a critical minerals reserve during an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 2, 2026. Trump announced the creation of “Project Vault,” a rare earth stockpile to lower reliance on China for rare earths and other resources. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA

Trump vs. his China hawks

Asia-Pacific

In the year since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, China hawks have started to panic. Leading lights on U.S. policy toward Beijing now warn that Trump is “barreling toward a bad bargain” with the Chinese Communist Party. Matthew Pottinger, a key architect of Trump’s China policy in his first term, argues that the president has put Beijing in a “sweet spot” through his “baffling” policy decisions.

Even some congressional Republicans have criticized Trump’s approach, particularly following his decision in December to allow the sale of powerful Nvidia AI chips to China. “The CCP will use these highly advanced chips to strengthen its military capabilities and totalitarian surveillance,” argued Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who chairs the influential Select Committee on Competition with China.

keep readingShow less
Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?
Top image credit: bluestork/shutterstock.com

Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?

Latin America

On January 7, the White House announced its plans to withdraw from 66 international bodies whose work it had deemed inconsistent with U.S. national interests.

While many of these organizations were international in nature, three of them were specific to the Americas — the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, and the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. The decision came on the heels of the Dominican Republic postponing the X Summit of the Americas last year following disagreements over who would be invited and ensuing boycotts.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.