Follow us on social

google cta
||

Diplomacy Watch: Ukrainian public opinion more divided than ever

Also, reporter Evan Gershkovich and former US marine Paul Whelan released in biggest prisoner swap to date.

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The New York Times this week published a story that added on-the-ground reporting in Kyiv to the growing accumulation of evidence that suggests that public opinion in Ukraine over how to end the war is more divided than it has been at any point since the February 2022 Russian invasion, and more complex than media narratives have often assumed.

The Times calls the trend “a palpable shift in the conversation around peace talks — from a no-deal-not-ever to a maybe-compromise-at-some-point.”

As recent editions of Diplomacy Watch have outlined, a series of polls of Ukrainians have shown that public opinion has moved meaningfully towards an acceptance that the war may have to end in a negotiated settlement.

Two weeks ago, the Ukrainian online newspaper ZN.ua published a surveythat found that almost 44% of Ukrainians believe that it is time for official negotiations with Russia to begin, nearly double the 23% that held that position when a similar poll was conducted a year ago.

Last week, a poll published by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology revealed that the share of Ukrainians open to making territorial concessions in exchange for an end to the war has tripled in the last 12 months, from 10% to 32%.

As the Times story points out, there is little clarity on what the contours of such a peace deal would look like. In the ZN.ua poll, for example, 83% of respondents were opposed to Putin’s publicly stated conditions for a ceasefire, while just over 60% said they were not prepared to make concessions to Russia in order to obtain a peace deal.

More than half of respondents in the KIIS poll agreed that Ukraine should not cede any territory to Russia.

Even though there is little agreement on what the endgame will or should look like, the trend in favor of some kind of compromise is clear. As QI’s Mark Episkopos argued in The Nation in late June, understanding the complexity of Ukrainian public opinion is an important step toward ending the war.

“[C]ontinuing to conflate the interests of the Ukrainian government with the hopes and aspirations of the Ukrainian people is a way of ducking responsibility. Refusing to see how this ruinous war is driving Ukrainian appetites for an end to the bloodshed allows Western policymakers to fall back on oversimplified, unfounded presumptions about Ukrainian public opinion, rather than develop a coherent, viable, and humane strategy for ending this war,” Episkopos wrote. “Caricatures of a totally unified Ukraine behind the Zelensky government only help gloss over real and growing challenges facing the nation—often in service of war aims that are becoming more impossible by the week.”

Among elites, signs have been more subtle, but there is evidence that Ukraine may be exploring the possibility of engaging directly with Russia. Ukraine’s foreign minister visited China for the first time since the invasion last week, and on Wednesday, Kyiv invited Beijing’s top diplomat to come to Ukraine. President Volodymyr Zelensky has also said he wants Russia to attend its next peace summit, though Moscow has so far remained noncommittal about participating.

In other diplomatic news related to the war in Ukraine:

—In more public opinion news, Pew released its latest poll, conducted during the first week of July, about American attitudes toward the war. The survey revealed stark partisan differences. Among Democratic or Democratic-leaning respondents, 63% said that Washington had a responsibility to defend Ukraine against Russian aggression, compared to 36% of Republican or Republican-leaning respondents.

A 36% plurality of Democrats also said that American support for Kyiv so far was “just right,” with 27% saying it was “not enough,” and 13% saying it was “too much.” Among Republicans, nearly half of respondents (47%) chose “too much” compared to 18% who said “just right” and 12% answered “not enough.” Just under a quarter of respondents in each party said they were not sure.

The breakdown was fairly similar to when the same question was asked in Pew polling in January 2023, December 2023, and April 2024, suggesting that partisan differences have solidified in the past 18 months.

— The United States and Russia, along with Germany, Poland, Slovenia, Norway, and Belarus, conducted the largest prisoner exchange since the Cold War on Thursday. A total of 26 prisoners were exchanged, including Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich and former U.S. marine Paul Whelan.

“Now, their brutal ordeal is over and they’re free,” President Joe Biden said. “This is an incredible relief for all the family members gathered here. And it’s a relief to the friends and colleagues all across the country who’ve been praying for this day for a long time.”

Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris welcomed Whalen, Gershkovich, and Russian dissident and U.S. resident Vladimir Kara-Murza just before midnight last night. The three were greeted also by their families in a jubilant reunion according to the Wall Street Journal.

— Since May, Ukraine has been drafting two or three times more people into its military per month than it was in the winter, according to The New York Times.

“Troop shortages have been one of Ukraine’s biggest problems on the battlefield for the past year,” according to the Times. “Russian forces have managed to break through weakened Ukrainian lines by overwhelming them with waves of ground assaults. And the Ukrainian Army has not had enough soldiers to mount large-scale counterattacks.”

According to Foreign Policy, the government in Kyiv is also aiming to mobilize 10,000 convicts in an effort to replenish its depleted forces. Ukraine passed a law in May that allows prisoners to be drafted into the military in exchange for early release.

U.S. State Department news:

Secretary of State Antony Blinken spoke about the prisoner exchange on Thursday.

“Through many difficult conversations over the past several years, I told the families of those wrongfully detained in Russia that we would not forget them," Blinken said. "I know there are many times over those years where they have wondered if our work would ever bear fruit. But I also know that they never gave up hope, and neither did we."

"My pledge to the families of those still separated from their families is the same that I made to those returning home today," he said. "We will not forget you, and we will not rest until you see your loved ones again."




Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Diplomacy Watch: A peace summit without Russia
Diplomacy Watch: What’s the point of Swiss peace summit?
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump
Top image credit: President Donald Trump addresses the nation, Wednesday, December 17, 2025, from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump national security logic: rare earths and fossil fuels

Washington Politics

The new National Security Strategy of the United States seeks “strategic stability” with Russia. It declares that China is merely a competitor, that the Middle East is not central to American security, that Latin America is “our hemisphere,” and that Europe faces “civilizational erasure.”

India, the world's largest country by population, barely rates a mention — one might say, as Neville Chamberlain did of Czechoslovakia in 1938, it’s “a faraway country... of which we know nothing.” Well, so much the better for India, which can take care of itself.

keep readingShow less
Experts at oil & weapons-funded think tank: 'Go big' in Venezuela
Top image credit: LightField Studios via shutterstock.com

Experts at oil & weapons-funded think tank: 'Go big' in Venezuela

Military Industrial Complex

As the U.S. threatens to take “oil, land and other assets” from Venezuela, staffers at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank funded in part by defense contractors and oil companies, are eager to help make the public case for regime change and investment. “The U.S. should go big” in Venezuela, write CSIS experts Ryan Berg and Kimberly Breier.

Both America’s Quarterly, which published the essay, and the authors’ employer happen to be funded by the likes of Lockheed Martin and ExxonMobil, a fact that is not disclosed in the article.

keep readingShow less
ukraine military
UKRAINE MARCH 22, 2023: Ukrainian military practice assault tactics at the training ground before counteroffensive operation during Russo-Ukrainian War (Shutterstock/Dymtro Larin)

Ukraine's own pragmatism demands 'armed un-alignment'

Europe

Eleven months after returning to the White House, the Trump administration believes it has finally found a way to resolve the four-year old war in Ukraine. Its formula is seemingly simple: land for security guarantees.

Under the current plan—or what is publicly known about it—Ukraine would cede the 20 percent of Donetsk that it currently controls to Russia in return for a package of security guarantees including an “Article 5-style” commitment from the United States, a European “reassurance force” inside post-war Ukraine, and peacetime Ukrainian military of 800,000 personnel.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.