Follow us on social

google cta
2022-04-07t100926z_1_lynxnpei360hk_rtroptp_4_ukraine-crisis-bucha-scaled Ukraine Civilian

Progressive orgs: Diplomacy key to ending bloodshed in Ukraine

30+ humanitarian, foreign policy, and peacebuilding groups urge Congress to pursue ‘realistic’ and ‘sophisticated’ talks with Russia and Ukraine

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

More than 30 progressive groups sent a letter to Congress on Tuesday asking legislators to pursue negotiations with Russia and Ukraine, insisting that realistic diplomacy key to ending the fighting and civilian suffering.

“This letter is notable for the wide range of organizations it brings together around the urgent need to end the suffering of Ukrainian civilians by bringing an end to the war,” says Tori Bateman, Director of Advocacy for the Quincy Institute, in a press release accompanying the letter. “The diplomatic process will be long and difficult, and it will take politicians from across the aisle being invested in its success to help bring the war to an end.”

The largely humanitarian and foreign policy-focused organizations — including Amnesty International USA, Oxfam America, the Friends Committee on National Legislation, and the Quincy Institute, publisher of Responsible Statecraft — emphasize the need to rebuild after Russia’s 2022 invasion and seek a “positive vision,” meant to strengthen human rights and establish a process "for reconciliation, accountability and repair."

Rather than attempting to address the details of the negotiations, the letter says that the initial round of talks “should focus on a framework for a continued peace process” that concentrates on ending the fighting, addressing humanitarian needs, and returning captives.

The organizations also insist that all parties “recognize civilians not just as victims but as active stakeholders in the peace process.” They say this will help prioritize guarantees for family reunification and commitments to rebuilding Ukraine. According to the letter, “the international community should support a process for accountability, justice, reparations, and reconciliation that can be accessed by all victims and survivors of violations of human rights and international humanitarian law.”

“Ending a war is only the first step toward lasting peace, we urge the Administration and Congress to invest seriously in a principled, just, and inclusive peace process,” said Bridget Moix, General Secretary of the Friends Committee on National Legislation, in the press release. “While diplomacy can be challenging, our Quaker peace testimony teaches us that war is never the answer and peace is indeed possible."

The peace process has so far suffered from impediments on all sides, but talks still appear to be ongoing and producing some results. High-level diplomats from both sides met in Istanbul last Friday, where they agreed to release thousands of prisoners and meet for further discussions, although a Ukrainian diplomat said that the Russian demands were “detached from reality and go far beyond anything that was previously discussed."


President Trump held a two-and-a-half-hour phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday, after saying that “progress has been made” and that both sides “will immediately start negotiations toward a ceasefire.”


Top Photo: Serhii Lahovskyi, 26, hugs Ludmyla Verginska, 51, as they mourn their common friend Ihor Lytvynenko, who according to residents was killed by Russian Soldiers, after they found him beside a building's basement, following his burial at the garden of a residential building, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, in Bucha, Ukraine April 5, 2022. REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Dan Caine
Top photo credit: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Air Force Gen. Dan Caine conduct a press briefing on Operation Epic Fury at the Pentagon, Washington, D.C., March 4, 2026. (DoW photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Alexander Kubitza)

Did Caine just announce the Morgenthau option for Iran?

QiOSK

Gen. Dan Caine’s formulation of American war aims in Iran is remarkable not because it is bellicose, but because it is strategically incoherent.

In a press conference Tuesday morning, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff did not describe a limited campaign to suppress missile fire, blunt Iran’s naval threat, or even impose a severe but bounded setback on Tehran’s coercive instruments. He described a campaign against Iran’s “military and industrial base” designed to prevent the regime from attacking Americans, U.S. interests, and regional partners “for years to come.” In an earlier briefing he put the objective similarly: to prevent Iran from projecting power outside its borders. Rather than the language of a discrete coercive operation, this describes a war against a state’s capacity to regenerate power.

keep readingShow less
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.