Follow us on social

2022-04-07t100926z_1_lynxnpei360hk_rtroptp_4_ukraine-crisis-bucha-scaled Ukraine Civilian

Progressive orgs: Diplomacy key to ending bloodshed in Ukraine

30+ humanitarian, foreign policy, and peacebuilding groups urge Congress to pursue ‘realistic’ and ‘sophisticated’ talks with Russia and Ukraine

Reporting | QiOSK

More than 30 progressive groups sent a letter to Congress on Tuesday asking legislators to pursue negotiations with Russia and Ukraine, insisting that realistic diplomacy key to ending the fighting and civilian suffering.

“This letter is notable for the wide range of organizations it brings together around the urgent need to end the suffering of Ukrainian civilians by bringing an end to the war,” says Tori Bateman, Director of Advocacy for the Quincy Institute, in a press release accompanying the letter. “The diplomatic process will be long and difficult, and it will take politicians from across the aisle being invested in its success to help bring the war to an end.”

The largely humanitarian and foreign policy-focused organizations — including Amnesty International USA, Oxfam America, the Friends Committee on National Legislation, and the Quincy Institute, publisher of Responsible Statecraft — emphasize the need to rebuild after Russia’s 2022 invasion and seek a “positive vision,” meant to strengthen human rights and establish a process "for reconciliation, accountability and repair."

Rather than attempting to address the details of the negotiations, the letter says that the initial round of talks “should focus on a framework for a continued peace process” that concentrates on ending the fighting, addressing humanitarian needs, and returning captives.

The organizations also insist that all parties “recognize civilians not just as victims but as active stakeholders in the peace process.” They say this will help prioritize guarantees for family reunification and commitments to rebuilding Ukraine. According to the letter, “the international community should support a process for accountability, justice, reparations, and reconciliation that can be accessed by all victims and survivors of violations of human rights and international humanitarian law.”

“Ending a war is only the first step toward lasting peace, we urge the Administration and Congress to invest seriously in a principled, just, and inclusive peace process,” said Bridget Moix, General Secretary of the Friends Committee on National Legislation, in the press release. “While diplomacy can be challenging, our Quaker peace testimony teaches us that war is never the answer and peace is indeed possible."

The peace process has so far suffered from impediments on all sides, but talks still appear to be ongoing and producing some results. High-level diplomats from both sides met in Istanbul last Friday, where they agreed to release thousands of prisoners and meet for further discussions, although a Ukrainian diplomat said that the Russian demands were “detached from reality and go far beyond anything that was previously discussed."


President Trump held a two-and-a-half-hour phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday, after saying that “progress has been made” and that both sides “will immediately start negotiations toward a ceasefire.”


Top Photo: Serhii Lahovskyi, 26, hugs Ludmyla Verginska, 51, as they mourn their common friend Ihor Lytvynenko, who according to residents was killed by Russian Soldiers, after they found him beside a building's basement, following his burial at the garden of a residential building, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, in Bucha, Ukraine April 5, 2022. REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra
Reporting | QiOSK
Afghanistan withdrawal
Lloyd Austin, Kenneth McKenzie, and Mark Milley in 2021. (MSNBC screengrab)

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on US or region

Military Industrial Complex

It will be four years since the U.S. withdrew from Afghanistan on Aug. 30, 2021, ending a nearly 20-year occupation that could serve as a poster child for mission creep.

What began in October 2001 as a narrow intervention to destroy al-Qaeda, the terrorist group that perpetrated the 9/11 attacks, and topple the Taliban government for refusing to hand over al-Qaeda’s leader, Osama bin Laden, morphed into an open-ended nation-building operation that killed 2,334 U.S. military personnel and wounded over 20,000 more.

keep readingShow less
Francois Bayrou Emmanuel Macron
Top image credit: France's Prime Minister Francois Bayrou arrives to hear France's President Emmanuel Macron deliver a speech to army leaders at l'Hotel de Brienne in Paris on July 13, 2025, on the eve of the annual Bastille Day Parade in the French capital. LUDOVIC MARIN/Pool via REUTERS

Europe facing revolts, promising more guns with no money

Europe

If you wanted to create a classic recipe for political crisis, you could well choose a mixture of a stagnant economy, a huge and growing public debt, a perceived need radically to increase military spending, an immigration crisis, a deeply unpopular president, a government without a majority in parliament, and growing radical parties on the right and left.

In other words, France today. And France’s crisis is only one part of the growing crisis of Western Europe as a whole, with serious implications for the future of transatlantic relations.

keep readingShow less
Starmer Macron Merz
Top image credit: France's President Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz arrive at Kyiv railway station on May 10, 2025, ahead of a gathering of European leaders in the Ukrainian capital. LUDOVIC MARIN/Pool via REUTERS

Europe's snapback gamble risks killing diplomacy with Iran

Middle East

Europe appears set to move from threats to action. According to reports, the E3 — Britain, France, and Germany — will likely trigger the United Nations “snapback” process this week. Created under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA), this mechanism allows any participant to restore pre-2015 U.N. sanctions if Iran is judged to be in violation of its commitments.

The mechanism contains a twist that makes it so potent. Normally, the Security Council operates on the assumption that sanctions need affirmative consensus to pass. But under snapback, the logic is reversed. Once invoked, a 30-day clock begins. Sanctions automatically return unless the Security Council votes to keep them suspended, meaning any permanent member can force their reimposition with a single veto.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.