Follow us on social

google cta
ukraine war

Diplomacy Watch: Ukraine and Europe brace for Trump

Uncertainty reigns amid Russian gains and active North Korean battalions

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Ukraine and its NATO neighbors nervously congratulated Donald Trump on his election this week, as the president-elect appears set to bring a dramatic reduction in support for Ukraine in its defense against Russia.

Trump spent his election campaign questioning the U.S. commitment to Ukraine, calling Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy “one of the greatest salesmen” on Oct. 14 and blaming him for the war. Trump also hinted that he may push for a truce on terms unfavorable to Kyiv — saying back in June that he’d “have that settled” before even taking office early next year.

Trump will now choose his precise Ukraine policy from a competing set of adviser approaches, the Wall Street Journal reports, with all of them united by a sharp diversion from the Biden administration’s unwavering loyalty to the Ukrainians.

One of those policy paths, according to several people close to Trump, involves Ukraine promising not to join NATO for at least 20 years in exchange for continuous American military funding to deter any future Russian aggression. From there, the front line as it stands would become an 800-mile demilitarized zone, though it is unclear who would police such a zone.

“We can do training and other support but the barrel of the gun is going to be European. We are not sending American men and women to uphold peace in Ukraine," a Trump team member said. "And we are not paying for it. Get the Poles, Germans, British and French to do it.”

Reporting from POLITICO highlights the views taken this week by Ukrainian leaders like Oleksandr Merezhko, head of the foreign relations committee in Ukraine’s parliament — calling a Trump presidency “maybe difficult, challenging, but not necessarily bad” for the nation.

Leaders across Europe reacted in a similar manner of trepidation. Germany’s top diplomat made an unannounced visit to Kyiv Monday in an apparent show of European support on the eve of the consequential election.

Zelenskyy himself congratulated Trump on Wednesday, using the opportunity to emphasize his push for continued mutual support between Ukraine and NATO.

"Ukraine, as one of Europe's strongest military powers, is committed to ensuring long-term peace and security in Europe and the Transatlantic community with the support of our allies," Zelenskyy said. "I am looking forward to personally congratulating President Trump and discussing ways to strengthen Ukraine's strategic partnership with the United States."

Other Ukraine News This Week:

Ukrainian forces have directly engaged with North Korean troops for the first time, The New York Times reported. Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov appeared on South Korean television network KBS on Thursday, saying they expected a “more significant number” of direct engagements in the coming weeks. Zelenskyy said the development has opened a “new page of instability in the world.

The U.S. estimates there are now 11,000 to 12,000 North Korean troops inside Russia with at least 10,000 in its Kursk Oblast region bordering Ukraine, Air Force Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder said in a Pentagon press briefing on Monday. Ryder did not outline a specific shift in the direction or scale of American support based on these developments.

Zelenskyy and others have stepped up pressure on allies since the presence of North Korean troops was confirmed, according to Al Jazeera. “We see an increase in North Koreans, but we don’t see any increase in the reaction from our partners,” Zelenskyy said in his nightly address on Tuesday.

Zelensky also called on the West to lift restrictions on long-range weapons to enable a preemptive Ukrainian strike on North Korean troops in Russia, according to Business Insider. Zelensky said last Friday that Ukraine can see “every site” where Russia has been accumulating North Korean troops on its territory and could reach them with a long-range strike, if given permission from its partners.

The Wall Street Journal said Monday that European security officials have linked Russian agents to a plot to smuggle explosives onto a cargo plane in Germany in a suspected “trial run” for future attacks targeting aircraft headed for the U.S. and Canada. The Journal described the development as part of an escalating Russian “sabotage campaign” against the U.S. and its allies.

From State Department Press Briefing on Nov. 4

Apart from several questions about the State Department and Pentagon’s aforementioned intelligence on North Korean troops in Russia, Ukraine was not addressed at this briefing.


top image: Diplomacy Watch: Ukraine and Europe brace for Trump presidency
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Iran nuclear
Top image credit: An Iranian cleric and a young girl stand next to scale models of Iran-made ballistic missiles and centrifuges after participating in an anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli rally marking the anniversary of the U.S. embassy occupation in downtown Tehran, Iran, on November 4, 2025.(Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via REUTERS CONNECT)

Want Iran to get the bomb? Try regime change

Middle East

Washington is once again flirting with a familiar temptation: the belief that enough pressure, and if necessary, military force, can bend Iran to its will. The Trump administration appears ready to move beyond containment toward forcing collapse. Before treating Iran as the next candidate for forced transformation, policymakers should ask a question they have consistently failed to answer in the Middle East: “what follows regime change?”

The record is sobering. In the past two decades, regime change in the region has yielded state fragmentation, authoritarian restoration, or prolonged conflict. Iraq remains fractured despite two decades of U.S. investment. Egypt’s democratic opening collapsed within a year. Libya, Syria, and Yemen spiraled into civil wars whose spillover persists. In each case, removing a regime proved far easier than constructing a viable successor. Iran would not be the exception. It would be the rule — at a scale that dwarfs anything the region has experienced.

keep readingShow less
Much ado about a Chinese 'mega-embassy' in London
Top image credit: London, UK - 3rd May 2025: Protestors gather outside the Royal Mint to demonstrate against plans to relocate China's embassy to the site. (Monkey Butler Images/Shutterstock)

Much ado about a Chinese 'mega-embassy' in London

Europe

A group of Russian nuns were recently sighted selling holy trinkets in Swedish churches. Soon, Swedish newspapers were awash with headlines about pro-Putin spies engaged in “funding the Putin war machine.” Russian Orthodox priests had also allegedly infiltrated Swedish churches located suspiciously close to military bases and airports.

Michael Ojermo, the rector of Täby, a suburb of Stockholm, tried to quell the alarm. There is no evidence of ecclesiastical espionage, he said, and “a few trinkets cannot fund a war.”

keep readingShow less
world powers
Top photo credit: (Ben_Je/Shutterstock)

US-China symposium: Spheres of influence for me, not for thee?

Asia-Pacific

In the new National Security Strategy and National Defense Strategy, the Trump team charges that the Monroe Doctrine has been "ignored" by previous administrations and that the primary goal now is to reassert control over its economic and security interests in the Western Hemisphere.

"We will guarantee U.S. military and commercial access to key terrain, especially the Panama Canal, Gulf of America, and Greenland," states the NDS. The U.S. will work with neighbors to protect "our shared interests," but "where they do not, we will stand ready to take focused, decisive action that concretely advances U.S. interests."

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.