Follow us on social

google cta
Tulsi Gabbard confirmed as Trump’s Director of National Intelligence

Tulsi Gabbard confirmed as Trump’s Director of National Intelligence

This victory over her detractors is seen as a win for restrainers

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The Senate just confirmed Tulsi Gabbard as President Trump’s Director of National Intelligence (DNI), with the Senate giving President Trump and Tulsi this important victory despite her tumultuous nomination fight.

The final vote was 52-48 mostly along party lines, with exactly one Republican — Sen. Mitch McConnell — voting in opposition.

This morning's confirmation came after 30 hours of post-cloture debate, but in the end, she prevailed, ending months of criticism, including attacks from people like Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), who said she was “likely a Russian asset” and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claiming that “she’s the favorite of the Russians.”

After some speculation that key Republicans would break against her, it turned out they provided the unity Gabbard needed to prevail — and it was not necessary, as with DoD Secretary Pete Hesgeth’s vote, to bring Vice President J.D. Vance in for the tie-breaker.

“As she brings independent thinking and necessary oversight to her new role, I am counting on her to ensure the safety and civil liberties of American citizens remain rigorously protected,” said Representative Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), once thought of as wobbly, ahead of Gabbard’s nomination.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) also threw her support behind Gabbard. She was one of the three GOP Senators who voted against Hegseth’s confirmation (along with Murkowski and McConnell (R - Ky). She had previously complained that there were “a lot of obvious issues” with Gabbard’s nomination, including Gabbard’s past statements against section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The law allows the federal government to collect intelligence information from non-Americans without warrant, but the ACLU and other organizations have scrutinized it for its potential to capture Americans’ communications, violating the 4th amendment.

Additionally, some were concerned about Gabbard’s previous support for whistleblower Edward Snowden. She previously sponsored a resolution calling for Snowden’s charges to be dropped and, on Joe Rogan’s podcast, commented that “if it wasn’t for Snowden, the American people would never have learned the NSA was collecting phone records and spying on Americans.”

Notably, during her Senate hearings, Tulsi would not call Snowden a traitor when prompted. However, she said that his actions "harmed our national security" and "revealed illegal and unconstitutional government programs that conducted mass surveillance of millions of Americans' data." She conceded that Snowden should have brought his concerns to the proper channels rather than leaking his findings to the media.

Most Republicans had vocalized support for Gabbard all along. Senator Rand Paul (R - Ky) was outspoken in his endorsement, “It’s time to put the intelligence community on notice: Reform is not just necessary — it’s here. I proudly support Tulsi Gabbard.”


Top Photo: Former Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard attends the Conservative Political Action Conference, CPAC 2024, at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center in National Harbor, Maryland on Feb. 22, 2024. USA TODAY NETWORK via Reuters Connect
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Why SCOTUS won’t deter Trump’s desire to weaponize trade
Top image credit: U.S. President Donald Trump talks to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts on the day of his speech to a joint session of Congress, in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., March 4, 2025. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

Why SCOTUS won’t deter Trump’s desire to weaponize trade

QiOSK

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court today ruled against the White House on a key economic initiative of the Trump administration, concluding that the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give the president the right to impose tariffs.

The ruling was not really a surprise; the tone of the questioning by several justices in early November was overwhelmingly skeptical of the administration’s argument, as prediction markets rightly concluded. Given the likelihood of this result, it should also come as no surprise that the Trump administration has already been plotting ways to work around the decision.

keep readingShow less
Trump Iran
Top image credit: Lucas Parker and FotoField via shutterstock.com

No, even a 'small attack' on Iran will lead to war

QiOSK

The Wall Street Journal reports that President Donald Trump is considering a small attack to force Iran to agree to his nuclear deal, and if Tehran refuses, escalate the attacks until Iran either agrees or the regime falls.

Here’s why this won’t work.

keep readingShow less
KC-135 Stratotanker
US Air Force (USAF) KC-135R Stratotanker, 92nd Air Refueling Wing (ARW), Fairchild AFB, Washington (US Air Force photo)

Military tankers for Iran attack deploying near Iraq War levels

QiOSK

Military experts say the U.S. asset mobilization in the Middle East theater is now resembling a real staging for war, with the prevailing chatter more about "when" than "if" an attack will happen.

One of the data points catching the eye of these experts is the number of air tankers — military aircraft used to refuel combat fighters in midair — that are in or headed to the region. Open source intelligence analysts say there are at least 108 such tankers either in CENTCOM theater as of Friday (31) or in strategic locations outside that command or staging in Europe. Most are KC-135 Stratotankers, made by Boeing. (Editor's note: This information has been updated).

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.