Follow us on social

google cta
Tulsi Gabbard confirmed as Trump’s Director of National Intelligence

Tulsi Gabbard confirmed as Trump’s Director of National Intelligence

This victory over her detractors is seen as a win for restrainers

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The Senate just confirmed Tulsi Gabbard as President Trump’s Director of National Intelligence (DNI), with the Senate giving President Trump and Tulsi this important victory despite her tumultuous nomination fight.

The final vote was 52-48 mostly along party lines, with exactly one Republican — Sen. Mitch McConnell — voting in opposition.

This morning's confirmation came after 30 hours of post-cloture debate, but in the end, she prevailed, ending months of criticism, including attacks from people like Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), who said she was “likely a Russian asset” and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claiming that “she’s the favorite of the Russians.”

After some speculation that key Republicans would break against her, it turned out they provided the unity Gabbard needed to prevail — and it was not necessary, as with DoD Secretary Pete Hesgeth’s vote, to bring Vice President J.D. Vance in for the tie-breaker.

“As she brings independent thinking and necessary oversight to her new role, I am counting on her to ensure the safety and civil liberties of American citizens remain rigorously protected,” said Representative Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), once thought of as wobbly, ahead of Gabbard’s nomination.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) also threw her support behind Gabbard. She was one of the three GOP Senators who voted against Hegseth’s confirmation (along with Murkowski and McConnell (R - Ky). She had previously complained that there were “a lot of obvious issues” with Gabbard’s nomination, including Gabbard’s past statements against section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The law allows the federal government to collect intelligence information from non-Americans without warrant, but the ACLU and other organizations have scrutinized it for its potential to capture Americans’ communications, violating the 4th amendment.

Additionally, some were concerned about Gabbard’s previous support for whistleblower Edward Snowden. She previously sponsored a resolution calling for Snowden’s charges to be dropped and, on Joe Rogan’s podcast, commented that “if it wasn’t for Snowden, the American people would never have learned the NSA was collecting phone records and spying on Americans.”

Notably, during her Senate hearings, Tulsi would not call Snowden a traitor when prompted. However, she said that his actions "harmed our national security" and "revealed illegal and unconstitutional government programs that conducted mass surveillance of millions of Americans' data." She conceded that Snowden should have brought his concerns to the proper channels rather than leaking his findings to the media.

Most Republicans had vocalized support for Gabbard all along. Senator Rand Paul (R - Ky) was outspoken in his endorsement, “It’s time to put the intelligence community on notice: Reform is not just necessary — it’s here. I proudly support Tulsi Gabbard.”


Top Photo: Former Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard attends the Conservative Political Action Conference, CPAC 2024, at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center in National Harbor, Maryland on Feb. 22, 2024. USA TODAY NETWORK via Reuters Connect
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
G7 Summit
Top photo credit: May 21, 2023, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan: (From R to L) Comoros' President Azali Assoumani, World Trade Organization (WTO) Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the G7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan. (Credit Image: © POOL via ZUMA Press Wire)

Middle Powers are setting the table so they won't be 'on the menu'

Asia-Pacific

The global order was already fragmenting before Donald Trump returned to the White House. But the upended “rules” of global economic and foreign policies have now reached a point of no return.

What has changed is not direction, but speed. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s remarks in Davos last month — “Middle powers must act together, because if we’re not at the table, we’re on the menu” — captured the consequences of not acting quickly. And Carney is not alone in those fears.

keep readingShow less
Vice President JD Vance Azerbaijan Armenia
U.S. Vice President JD Vance gets out of a car before boarding Air Force Two upon departure for Azerbaijan, at Zvartnots International Airport in Yerevan, Armenia, February 10, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/Pool

VP Vance’s timely TRIPP to the South Caucasus

Washington Politics

Vice President JD Vance’s regional tour to Armenia and Azerbaijan this week — the highest level visit by an American official to the South Caucasus since Vice President Joe Biden went to Georgia in 2009 — demonstrates that Washington is not ignoring Yerevan and Baku and is taking an active role in their normalization process.

Vance’s stop in Armenia included an announcement that Yerevan has procured $11 million in U.S. defense systems — a first — in particular Shield AI’s V-BAT, an ISR unmanned aircraft system. It was also announced that the second stage of a groundbreaking AI supercomputer project led by Firebird, a U.S.-based AI cloud and infrastructure company, would commence after having secured American licensing for the sale and delivery of an additional 41,000 NVIDIA GB300 graphics processing units.

keep readingShow less
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.