Follow us on social

Tulsi Gabbard confirmation hearing

Snowden, Snowden, Snowden! Tulsi grilled on little else

Senators play gotcha games at Gabbard's confirmation hearing today

Analysis | QiOSK

Though well ensconced at home in Russia, accused leaker and U.S. defector Edward Snowden nonetheless took center stage at former Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard’s confirmation hearing for Director of National Intelligence (DNI) on Thursday, and frankly, he never left.

For her part, Gabbard utilized her opening remarks to focus on what she perceives would be her intelligence role, explaining that previous Intelligence Community (IC) decisions — including “failures” but also “fabrications”— have led to major foreign policy blunders, a toll on American servicemen and women, and precipitated massive human suffering.

“Our complete failure of intelligence…has led to costly failures and the undermining of our national security and god-given rights enshrined in the constitution,” Gabbard elucidated to the Senate Intelligence Committee. “The most obvious example of one of these [U.S. intelligence] failures is our invasion of Iraq based upon a total fabrication, our complete failure of intelligence. This disastrous decision led to the deaths of tens of thousands of American soldiers, millions of people in the Middle East…the rise of ISIS, the strengthening of Al Qaeda and other Islamist Jihadist groups.”

Gabbard connected such remarks to ongoing developments in Syria, citing a 2012 email where Obama's assistant national security advisor Jake Sullivan told then secretary of state Hillary Clinton that “[Al Qaeda] is on our side in Syria.”

“Syria is now controlled by al-Qaeda offshoot HTS, led by an Islamist Jihadist who danced in the streets on 9/11, and who was responsible for the killing of many American soldiers,” Gabbard explained.

Explaining that time in the military and Congress taught her "the heavy costs of intelligence failures and abuses,” Gabbard said she would "work to end the politicization of the intelligence community” and “ensure there is a clear mission focus in the IC on its core mission of…unbiased, apolitical collection and analysis of intelligence” as DNI.

As expected, senators (mostly Democrats, but Republicans, too) asked Gabbard if she supported 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and repeatedly questioned Gabbard’s 2017 meeting with then Syrian president Bashar al-Assad. On the first, Gabbard reiterated that she did support the authority (a shift from her earlier position) and to the second, responded that “I believe that leaders — whether you be in Congress or the President — can benefit greatly by going and engaging with people whether they be adversaries or friends."

But beyond that, senators repeatedly slammed Gabbard’s position on Edward Snowden, a whistleblower/hero or traitor depending on who is doing the talking. Snowden had leaked thousands of classified documents exposing widespread NSA surveillance on Americans in 2013. Gabbard, working with then Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz, introduced legislation to drop Snowden’s charges in 2020.

Senators repeatedly asked Gabbard if she would call Snowden a traitor. Gabbard conceded Snowden broke the law and that she would no longer push for his pardon, but maintained he released documents critical to revealing the extent of the American government’s illegal spying on Americans. He landed in Russia on the way to asylum elsewhere in 2013 (his U.S. passport was revoked) and obtained Russian citizenship in 2022.

“Edward Snowden broke the law, and he released information in a way that he should not have,” Gabbard said in response to Senator Ted Budd’s (R-NC) questions about Snowden. “He also acknowledged and exposed information that was unconstitutional, which drove a lot of the reforms that this body has made over the years to make sure that American’s constitutional rights are protected.”’

The predominance of Snowden in the hearing was not lost on media observing the spectacle.

"Senators Michael Bennet and James Lankford and others beclowned themselves with obsessive questions about Snowden — a man who committed a crime over a decade ago but one who exposed abuses by our government," said The American Conservative's Curt Mills in the New York Times. "Their focus revealed the kind of myopia that has now twice motivated Americans to vault Trump into power."

After almost three hours of questioning, Gabbard’s confirmation process subsequently shifted to a closed door session, with a confirmation vote to be scheduled “ASAP.” Gabbard can't afford to lose one Republican vote in order for Chairman Tom Cotton to move forward from the Intelligence Committee to a full Senate vote "with confidence." As Intercept reporter Matt Sledge posited, “if Thursday’s questioning was any indication, the vote could hinge on Gabbard’s position on Snowden.”


Top photo credit: CSPAN screenshot, 1/30/25
Analysis | QiOSK
The absolute wrong way to deploy US military on the border
Top photo credit: U.S. Marines with 7th Engineer Support Battalion, Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force 7, place concertina wire at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry in California on Nov. 11, 2018. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Staff Sgt. Rubin J. Tan)

The absolute wrong way to deploy US military on the border

North America

“Guys and gals of my generation have spent decades in foreign countries guarding other people's borders. It's about time we secure our own,” Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said during his first trip to the southern border earlier this month. “This needs to be and will be a focus of this department,” he reiterated at a Pentagon town hall days later.

Most servicemembers deploying to the southern border today never fought in the post-9/11 wars, but Hegseth is right that their commanders and civilian bosses have plenty of experience to draw on from two decades spent “securing” and “stabilizing” Iraq and Afghanistan.

keep readingShow less
Volodymyr Zelenskiy Donald Trump
Top image credit: Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy meet at Trump Tower in New York City, U.S., September 27, 2024. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo

The steep but worthy price of minerals for peace in Ukraine

Europe

Ukraine’s President Volodomyr Zelensky has agreed to hand over to the U.S. $500 billion worth of his country’s rare earth minerals. On the back of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s comments ruling out NATO membership for Ukraine, this looks like a dreadful deal on the surface. But it may be the best one available.

During his visit to Kyiv on February 12, Treasury Secretary Steve Bessent spoke to the press, beside Zelensky, about a proposed agreement on U.S. access to rare earths. It was a day, in fact, of geopolitical earthquakes in Europe. At a NATO Ukraine Contact Group meeting in Brussels, Hegseth was bluntly ruling out NATO membership for Ukraine or a return to its pre-2014 borders. The latter may be an elegant form of words suggesting scope to negotiate on border changes since 2022.

keep readingShow less
Munich Dispatch: Gaza issue banished to the sidelines this year
Top photo credit: Ursula von der Leyen speaks to the Munich Security Conference, 2/15/25 (MSC/Lennart Preiss)

Munich Dispatch: Gaza issue banished to the sidelines this year

Europe

MUNICH, GERMANY — Last year, the Munich Security Conference was dominated by the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. This time around, the Gaza War has remained a notable absence in Munich, at least on the confab’s main stage.

This was confirmed on Sunday, the last day of the conference, which was light on headlines amid the snowy Munich outside. The big news story Sunday didn't even originate from the conference, but in reports suggesting U.S. and Russian officials will meet in Saudi Arabia next week for talks to end the Ukraine War without the participation of Ukraine or other European countries.

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.