Follow us on social

google cta
Ted Cruz Tucker Carlson

Ted Cruz thinks you're stupid

After roasted by Tucker Carlson over Israel, the Texas Republican clapped back with a sad spreadsheet and a not-so-subtle smear

Reporting | Washington Politics
google cta
google cta

Rightwing pundit Tucker Carlson recently made Ted Cruz look like a buffoon.

Cruz said during their interview in June, “I was taught from the Bible, those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed. And from my perspective, I want to be on the blessing side of things.”

Carlson looked puzzled. He asked the Republican senator what part of the Bible said this. Cruz didn’t know.

Carlson told Cruz he was citing Genesis, whether he realized it or not, but also wondered how the senator could believe such a thing but not even be able to pinpoint the scripture (Cruz, the Texan, was seemingly appealing to evangelical Christian Zionists whose dispensationalist theology, heavily concentrated in the Southeast United States, dictates that they must unequivocally support the state of Israel formed in 1948).

“So you’re quoting a Bible phrase, you don’t have context for it,” Carlson asked. “You don’t know where in the Bible it is, but that’s your theology? I’m confused. What does that even mean?”

Carlson pushed Cruz to define what he meant by “Israel.” Did he mean the state’s current borders? It’s current government? A “political entity?” It’s biblical meaning?

Cruz settled on the term “nation.”

Not letting up, Carlson asked, “Is the nation God is referring to in Genesis, is that the same as the country run by Benjamin Netanyahu right now?”

It was not a good look for Cruz, pitting “America First” MAGA populists that comprise much of Carlson’s audience against old guard Republicans who have long supported Benjamin Netanyahu’s government at any cost, and have relied heavily on American evangelical support as their base.

On Thursday, Cruz seemed to attempt to win back points against Carlson by sharing a video on X, showing Carlson and a number of his recent guests mentioning “Israel” a lot.

Cruz wrote, “Wow. Why does (Tucker Carlson) seem to care more about Israel than any other country on earth? Since our interview, he & his show have referenced Israel 14.82 times EVERY SINGLE DAY.”

The senator asked, “Is there something particular about Israel that he really, really dislikes?”

Let’s face it, he seems to be suggesting that Tucker might be antisemitic.

The day before Cruz’s tweet, GOP Senator Lindsey Graham told a Republican audience, seemingly appealing to evangelical Christians in his party’s base, “If America pulls the plug on Israel, God will pull the plug on us.”

“I’m not going to let that happen,” Graham vowed.

What does this mean? Israel should be able to do whatever it wants, no matter what that might be, and on the U.S.’s dime? “Israel First?” In fact, Sen. Graham talks about Israel a lot. Does Cruz detect something sinister about his language? Of course not.

More importantly, given how deeply, financially, and morally the United States is involved in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Gaza, shouldn’t American journalists be talking about the carnage and mentioning the parties involved, as Cruz has accused Carlson and his guests of doing in a supposedly terrible way?

Even more important, given the intimacy of the U.S.-Israeli relationship and the widespread death and starvation happening in Gaza, shouldn’t American reporters and opinion makers be challenging the governments of the United States and Israel? Asking as many questions as possible? Interviewing experts and giving some context to these life-and-death global events?

If you’re Ted Cruz, that answer appears to be “no.” He appears to believe that if you talk about Israel too much, it might mean you’re antisemitic.

It seems Cruz is relying on his followers being stupid.

The charge of “antisemitism” for merely questioning anything the government of Israel does is a tired neoconservative trope, deployed for years by bullies like talk show host Mark Levin to shut down criticism and keep the right in line. As MAGA “America First” populism now includes younger Southern evangelicals who are less dispensationalist when it comes to Israel in their theology, this trick just doesn’t resonate the way it used to.

But it's all Cruz seems to have. After his embarrassing drubbing by Carlson, it’s an attempt to save face — to whatever effect and to whomever on the right still believes this propaganda.

I suppose you can’t blame him for trying. In the meantime, Tucker Carlson’s interview with Ted Cruz has surged, and he is roasted all over again.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Top image credit: Lev Radin, Maxim Elramsisy via shutterstock.com
google cta
Reporting | Washington Politics
Cuba Miami Dade Florida
Top image credit: MIAMI, FL, UNITED STATES - JULY 13, 2021: Cubans protesters shut down part of the Palmetto Expressway as they show their support for the people in Cuba. Fernando Medina via shutterstock.com

South Florida: When local politics become rogue US foreign policy

Latin America

The passions of exile politics have long shaped South Florida. However, when local officials attempt to translate those passions into foreign policy, the result is not principled leadership — it is dangerous government overreach with significant national implications.

We see that in U.S. Cuba policy, and more urgently today, in Saturday's "take over" of Venezuela.

keep readingShow less
Is Greenland next? Denmark says, not so fast.
President Donald J. Trump participates in a pull-aside meeting with the Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Denmark Mette Frederiksen during the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 70th anniversary meeting Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2019, in Watford, Hertfordshire outside London. (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

Is Greenland next? Denmark says, not so fast.

North America

The Trump administration dramatically escalated its campaign to control Greenland in 2025. When President Trump first proposed buying Greenland in 2019, the world largely laughed it off. Now, the laughter has died down, and the mood has shifted from mockery to disbelief and anxiety.

Indeed, following Trump's military strike on Venezuela, analysts now warn that Trump's threats against Greenland should be taken seriously — especially after Katie Miller, wife of Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, posted a U.S. flag-draped map of Greenland captioned "SOON" just hours after American forces seized Nicolas Maduro.

keep readingShow less
Trump White House
Top photo credit: President Donald Trump Speaks During Roundtable With Business Leaders in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, Washington, DC on December 10, 2025 (Shutterstock/Lucas Parker)

When Trump's big Venezuela oil grab runs smack into reality

Latin America

Within hours of U.S. military strikes on Venezuela and the capture of its leader, Nicolas Maduro, President Trump proclaimed that “very large United States oil companies would go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, and start making money for the country.”

Indeed, at no point during this exercise has there been any attempt to deny that control of Venezuela’s oil (or “our oil” as Trump once described it) is a major force motivating administration actions.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.