Follow us on social

Is a new war on terror kicking off in the Caribbean?

Is a new war on terror kicking off in the Caribbean?

US conducts ‘lethal strike’ against ‘drug vessel’ near Venezuela

Reporting | QiOSK

The U.S. military attacked a “drug-carrying boat” after it departed from Venezuela, according to President Trump, who recently surged American troops to the southern Caribbean in what he says is an effort to fight drug trafficking.

A senior U.S. defense official confirmed the attack in a statement to Responsible Statecraft, describing the operation as a “precision strike against a drug vessel operated by a designated narco-terrorist organization.” In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that the strike killed 11 members of Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan gang that the U.S. says is controlled by Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. Trump added that the attack took place in international waters.

The strike represents a serious escalation of Trump’s ongoing conflict with Latin American criminal organizations. As a candidate, Trump promised to use military force against Mexican cartels, and since taking office, he has designated multiple Mexican cartels and Venezuelan gangs as foreign terrorist organizations, a designation that includes groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS.

Tuesday’s operation comes amid furious speculation over why Trump has surged U.S. forces to the southern Caribbean, including roughly 4,000 soldiers, seven warships and a nuclear submarine. Some observers frame the surge as a symbolic show of force, noting U.S. statistics showing that the vast majority of cocaine flowing to the United States from South America comes through the Pacific rather than the Caribbean. Maduro described the deployment as an “absolutely criminal and bloody threat” to his government. Military analysts, for their part, say that the relatively small size of the troop surge makes a full-scale invasion unlikely, though the force would be more than large enough to continue operations like the one carried out on Tuesday.

It remains unclear what legal authority the U.S. is using to justify the attack. Last month, the New York Times reported that Trump “secretly signed a directive” that authorized the military to target cartels, but Congress has yet to pass an authorization for the use of military force.

U.S.-Venezuela tensions have grown in recent months as Trump has increased pressure on Maduro by designating him as a terrorist under U.S. law and putting a $50 million bounty on his head.

The attack comes as Secretary of State Marco Rubio travels to Mexico this week, where he will meet with high-level officials to discuss drugs and immigration. The possibility of U.S. airstrikes against Mexican cartels will loom over those conversations, with Tuesday’s attack highlighting America’s willingness to opt for military force.

Many military experts argue that bombing the cartels is an ineffective approach to stopping the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. “If the objective is to bomb the cartels into submission or convince them to stop producing and shipping drugs across America’s southern border, then an air campaign will fall flat,” argued Dan DePetris in a recent article for Responsible Statecraft, citing America’s failed efforts to destroy poppy farms in Afghanistan in order to cut off the Taliban’s drug revenue.


Top image credit: U.S. President Donald Trump replies to a question during an event to announce that the Space Force Command will move from Colorado to Alabama, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 2, 2025. REUTERS/Brian Snyder
Reporting | QiOSK
Israel’s foreign influence is the most unrelenting in US history
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., right, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, arrive to address the media after a meeting in the U.S. Capitol on Friday, February 7, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Sipa USA)
First order of House business: Protect Israel’s Netanyahu?

Israel’s foreign influence is the most unrelenting in US history

Washington Politics

In his farewell address to the nation, George Washington included a special pleading:

"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government."

keep readingShow less
Azov Ukraine
Top photo credit: Servicemen of the Azov battalion are attending a ceremony to remember the victims of the Olenivka camp explosion, in Kyiv, Ukraine, on July 28, 2024, (Photo by Maxym Marusenko/NurPhoto)

Far-right Azov quietly grew to tens of thousands in Ukraine military

Europe

Over the last several weeks, Russia’s 51st Combined Arms Army has achieved a penetration of the Ukrainian defenses northeast of Pokrovsk, seeking to isolate the Ukrainian forces defending the city.

To seal off the penetration, Ukrainian forces committed a large number of formations, spearheaded by the 1st “Azov” National Guard Corps.

keep readingShow less
Donald Trump Vladimir Putin
Top image credit: President Donald Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin speak backstage before they participate in a joint press conference after their meeting at the Arctic Warrior Event Center at Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, Friday, August 15, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Why is Putin OK with Ukraine joining the EU?

Europe

Lost amid the focus on summit pageantry, land swaps, and security guarantees last week was an issue even more central to a diplomatic resolution of the Ukraine war: whether Russian President Vladimir Putin is ready to accept Ukraine’s membership in the EU as part of a settlement deal.

That concession was an important element of a peace deal that Russian and Ukrainian negotiators drafted under Turkish mediation in 2022, which Ukraine subsequently abandoned.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.