Follow us on social

Trump hails US airstrike against smugglers in the Caribbean

Trump hails US airstrike against smugglers in the Caribbean

Military attacked a 'drug carrying' boat after it departed Venezuela, killing 11 suspected gang members

Reporting | QiOSK

The U.S. military attacked a “drug-carrying boat” after it departed from Venezuela, according to President Trump, who recently surged American troops to the southern Caribbean in what he says is an effort to fight drug trafficking.

A senior U.S. defense official confirmed the attack in a statement to Responsible Statecraft, describing the operation as a “precision strike against a drug vessel operated by a designated narco-terrorist organization.” In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that the strike killed 11 members of Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan gang that the U.S. says is controlled by Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. Trump added that the attack took place in international waters.

The strike represents a serious escalation of Trump’s ongoing conflict with Latin American criminal organizations. As a candidate, Trump promised to use military force against Mexican cartels, and since taking office, he has designated multiple Mexican cartels and Venezuelan gangs as foreign terrorist organizations, a designation that includes groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS.

Tuesday’s operation comes amid furious speculation over why Trump has surged U.S. forces to the southern Caribbean, including roughly 4,000 soldiers, seven warships and a nuclear submarine. Some observers frame the surge as a symbolic show of force, noting U.S. statistics showing that the vast majority of cocaine flowing to the United States from South America comes through the Pacific rather than the Caribbean. Maduro described the deployment as an “absolutely criminal and bloody threat” to his government. Military analysts, for their part, say that the relatively small size of the troop surge makes a full-scale invasion unlikely, though the force would be more than large enough to continue operations like the one carried out on Tuesday.

It remains unclear what legal authority the U.S. is using to justify the attack. Last month, the New York Times reported that Trump “secretly signed a directive” that authorized the military to target cartels, but Congress has yet to pass an authorization for the use of military force.

U.S.-Venezuela tensions have grown in recent months as Trump has increased pressure on Maduro by designating him as a terrorist under U.S. law and putting a $50 million bounty on his head.

The attack comes as Secretary of State Marco Rubio travels to Mexico this week, where he will meet with high-level officials to discuss drugs and immigration. The possibility of U.S. airstrikes against Mexican cartels will loom over those conversations, with Tuesday’s attack highlighting America’s willingness to opt for military force.

Many military experts argue that bombing the cartels is an ineffective approach to stopping the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. “If the objective is to bomb the cartels into submission or convince them to stop producing and shipping drugs across America’s southern border, then an air campaign will fall flat,” argued Dan DePetris in a recent article for Responsible Statecraft, citing America’s failed efforts to destroy poppy farms in Afghanistan in order to cut off the Taliban’s drug revenue.


Top image credit: U.S. President Donald Trump replies to a question during an event to announce that the Space Force Command will move from Colorado to Alabama, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 2, 2025. REUTERS/Brian Snyder
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump Xi Jinping
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping react as they hold a bilateral meeting at Gimhae International Airport, on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit, in Busan, South Korea, October 30, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein TPX

Can Trump finally break with Biden's failed China policy?

Asia-Pacific

UPDATE 10/30: President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping emerged from much anticipated meeting in South Korea Thursday with a broad framework for a deal moving forward. Trump said the U.S. would lower tariffs on China, while Beijing would delay new export restrictions on rare earth minerals for one year and crack down on the trade in fentanyl components.


keep readingShow less
Iraq elections 2025
Top photo credit: Supporters attend a ceremony announcing the Reconstruction and Development Coalition election platform ahead of Iraq’s upcoming parliamentary elections in Karbala, Iraq, October 10, 2025. REUTERS/Thaier Al-Sudani

Iraq faces first quiet election in decades. Don't let that fool you.

Middle East

Iraqis head to the polls on November 11 for parliamentary elections, however surveys predict record-low turnout, which may complicate creation of a government.

This election differs from those before: Muqtada al-Sadr has withdrawn from politics; Hadi al-Ameri’s Badr Organization is contesting the vote independently; and Hezbollah — Iran’s ally in Lebanon — is weakened. Though regional unrest persists, Iraq itself is comparatively stable.

keep readingShow less
Trump Xi
Top image credit: Joey Sussman and Photo Agency via shutterstock.com

Trump-Xi reset could collapse under the weight of its ambition

Asia-Pacific

On Thursday, President Donald Trump is expected to meet with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the APEC Summit in Seoul, where they will aim to calm escalating trade tensions and even explore striking a “Big Deal” between the world’s two superpowers.

The stakes could not be higher. The package reportedly under discussion could span fentanyl controls, trade, export restrictions, Chinese students, and even China’s civil-military fusion strategy. It would be the most ambitious effort in years to reset relations between Washington and Beijing. And it could succeed — or collapse — under the weight of its own ambition.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.