Follow us on social

Trump houthis

Trump deal with the Houthis: Declare victory and go home?

Surprise announcement comes after Yemeni militant group was able to hit Israel with missile on Sunday

Analysis | QiOSK

Trump described the Houthis as having “capitulated,” saying, "We will stop the bombings. They have capitulated... we will take their word that they will not be blowing up ships anymore, and that's the purpose of what we were doing."

Trump’s announcement generated speculation about whether the agreement included Houthi attacks on Israel — Israel was apparently unaware of the deal — as Trump’s statement appeared to pertain exclusively to Red Sea shipping.

A Houthi missile struck near Ben Gurion airport on May 4, demonstrating that the group is capable of penetrating Israel's Iron Dome and THAAD missile defenses. In response, Israel and the U.S. pummeled Houthi positions as well as crucial infrastructure for Yemeni civilians, including Hodeidah port and Sanaa airport. The U.S. has bombed Yemen every night since March 15, following the decision to launch American attacks despite the lack of any imminent threat to U.S. positions, as acknowledged by administration officials in the Signalgate group chat imbroglio.

It is unclear if the truce with the Houthis is intended to last. President Trump is scheduled to begin the first international trip of his second term on May 13, when he will travel to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar. The Gulf states are eager to avoid getting caught in a war between the U.S. and Iran. Tehran has communicated that if America’s Arab partners allow the U.S. to launch attacks from their soil, they will be considered targets for Iranian retaliation.

Therefore, Trump’s announcement may be intended to calm tensions ahead of his meetings with Gulf leaders in Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, and Doha. In this, the announcement may not be unlike his short-lived ceasefire, which Trump pressured Netanyahu to accept in time for his inauguration; Trump then did nothing to ensure that Israel upheld the deal. After initially allowing some aid into Gaza, Israel violated the agreement by blocking all food, water, fuel, and medicine from entering Gaza since March 2, and on March 18, Israel fully abandoned the ceasefire, resuming its daily bombing of the Gaza Strip. Unfortunately, Trump’s interest in calming tensions with the Houthis may only persist as long as he is in the region, trying to secure lucrative deals with his Saudi, Emirati, and Qatari partners.

Yet there is a possibility that the truce with the Houthis could persist at least for the duration of the Trump administration’s negotiations with Tehran over Iran’s nuclear program. Trump’s interest in the talks was reiterated by his decision to fire his National Security Advisor Mike Waltz on May 5, who had colluded with Netanyahu to try to thwart the negotiations.

The Houthi truce may also reflect Trump’s awareness of his base’s preferences. In a post on X on May 2, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene aired her frustration, saying “I campaigned for no more foreign wars.” She went on, “I don’t think we should be bombing foreign countries on behalf of other foreign countries especially when they have their own nuclear weapons and massive military strength,” making her one of the few Republican politicians willing to question America’s unconditional support for Israel.

The preferences of Trump’s base align with those of his Gulf allies. In recent years, the previously bellicose Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has tried to avoid unnecessary conflict, whether with Tehran or Sanaa, in order to encourage tourism and foreign investment to support Vision 2030, his plan to reduce his kingdom’s reliance on fossil fuels. Both Saudi Arabia and the UAE agreed to a truce with the Houthis in April 2022 after the group had demonstrated that their missiles could hit their capital cities. U.S. bombardment of the Houthis has already cost more than $3 billion, plus seven MQ-9 Reaper drones, each worth millions of dollars, not to mention an embarrassing incident where a F/A-18E Super Hornet fighter jet – worth more than $60 million – fell off a U.S. aircraft carrier into the Red Sea.

For their part, the Houthis maintained they could stop assaults on U.S. warships if American attacks end, but that attacks on Israel would continue until it stops its 18-month war on Gaza.

“The Yemeni people remain committed to their pressure options against the [Israeli] entity until the aggression on Gaza stops and the blockade is lifted,” the statement said. “The Israeli and American aggression will not go unanswered and will not deter Yemen from continuing its supportive stance toward Gaza.”

Although Trump may primarily wish for a pause in Houthi attacks as he seeks to reassure America’s wealthy allies in the Gulf, America’s interests would be best served by avoiding further escalation in the Red Sea. As security analyst Emma Ashford tweeted about the truce: “Declaring victory and going home is often not the worst strategic choice.”


Top photo credit: Shy News Screenshot
Analysis | QiOSK
Merz Macron Starmer Zelensky
Top image credit: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, Ukranian President Voloydmyr Zelensky, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk walk in the grounds of the Mariynsky Palace, in Kyiv, Ukraine, May 10, 2025. Ludovic Marin/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

Europe's sticks are a little limp

Europe

As the Istanbul peace talks get underway, Europe’s response to the Russia-Ukraine war exposes its profound weakness and reliance on U.S. support, with leaders like France’s Emmanuel Macron, Britain’s Keir Starmer, and Germany’s Friedrich Merz resorting to bluffs that lack substance.

The European trio, after visiting Kyiv and meeting with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on May 10, issued Russia a 30-day ceasefire ultimatum to begin on May 12, threatening severe sanctions in case of Moscow’s non-compliance. Russian President Vladimir Putin dismissed it, offering talks in Istanbul without a truce instead, in line with Russia’s insistence that the “root causes” of the conflict be addressed, including Ukraine’s potential NATO membership.

keep readingShow less
russia holds the cards
Top photo credit: okanakdeniz/shutterstock

Istanbul 2.0: Know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em

Europe

The biggest achievement of today’s Istanbul talks is that they are even taking place. U.S. engagement will remain vital to getting a peace deal over the line. Russia’s desire for a reset with Washingtonmay keep them on track.

I have a sense of déjà vu as I contemplate these long-overdue peace talks between Ukraine and Russia in Istanbul. In April 2022, Ukraine and Russia were close to agreeing a peace treaty, less than two months after war started. However, this came crashing down amid claims that western governments, in particular the United States and the United Kingdom encouraged Ukraine to keep fighting.

keep readingShow less
The desperation of Gaza famine denialism
Top photo credit: Dislocated Palestinians wait in line with pots in their hands to receive relief meals from a charity kitchen in Gaza City, on May 3, 2025. (Photo by Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto)

The desperation of Gaza famine denialism

Middle East

As the risk of famine spreads across Gaza — and as shocking images of overcrowded soup lines stream from Gaza daily — an influential network of Israeli government defenders has emerged to tell you that none of this is happening at all.

The Free Press — a pro-Israel media outlet often sympathetic to the neoconservative worldview — published a highly circulated article last week from journalist Michael Ames titled, “The Gaza Famine Myth,” which purports to demonstrate that food security in Gaza has been far above the famine and crisis levels that international humanitarian organizations have observed since at least early 2024.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.