Follow us on social

Trump Joint Base Andrews

Trump: We 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program, and now, 'peace'

President announces strikes on three nuclear facilities and claims victory. Lawmakers on both sides, react.

Reporting | Middle East

President Donald Trump told the American people tonight in a brief address to the nation that Iran's nuclear program has been ""completely totally obliterated" after U.S. airstrikes on Iran overnight into Sunday morning, Tehran time.

He congratulated Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who launched Israel's strikes against Iran on June 13 and has been asking for U.S. assistance ever since. "We have worked as a team like no team has worked together before."

According to Trump and confirmed by reports earlier, the mountain facility at Fordo was struck, as well as the enrichment plant at Natanz, as well as a another site at Isfahan. The strikes were carried out in part by B-2s, which can carry payloads of 30,000-pound "bunker buster" bombs. Later reports indicated that dozens of bunker busters were used on Fordo and Natanz, and that Navy submarines fired 30 TLAM cruise missiles at the Natanz and Isfahan sites.

Trump praised the "brilliant military minds" who helped plan the successful attacks — "the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades."

The said now there "will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran, far greater for Iran than we have witnessed in the last many days," he added, noting there "are many other targets." He then proceeded to say "God Bless the Middle East, God Bless Israel" and then blessed the U.S. military.

His remarks came after he first announced the strikes around 8 PM EST on his Truth Social account:

  


Adam Weinstein, a Quincy Institute Middle East fellow who served as a combat Marine in Afghanistan, said the U.S. has now officially put the 40,000 troops in the Middle East in harm's way, a warning that many had tried to convey to the president and administration all week in the run up to tonight's action.

"You’ve put every U.S. troop and embassy in the region at risk and squandered America’s diplomatic leverage—though you’ll likely think you’ve strengthened it."

Some of the biggest MAGA supporters who had been against U.S. war with Iran have so far not moved.

“Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war,” posted Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has been among the most vocal in the run up to the strikes.

“There would not be bombs falling on the people of Israel if Netanyahu had not dropped bombs on the people of Iran first. Israel is a nuclear armed nation. This is not our fight. Peace is the answer”

Lawmakers pounced on the fact the president did not have Congressional authorization to attack, knowing that there was no imminent threat to the country.

“This is not Constitutional,” posted Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky), who had been vocalizing opposition to the strikes and had proposed legislation to stop them.

When Speaker Mike Johnson posted that the Congress did not have time to authorize because leaders "knew" the country was in "imminent danger" (he points to the nuclear weapons that don't yet exist and accuses Iran of being the "world's largest state sponsor of terrorism"), Massie shot back: "Why didn’t you call us back from vacation to vote on military action if there was a serious threat to our country?"

Rep. Warren Davidson, (R-Ohio), also a veteran, urged caution. "While President Trump’s decision may prove just, it’s hard to conceive a rationale that’s Constitutional. I look forward to his remarks tonight."

"According to the Constitution we are both sworn to defend, my attention to this matter comes BEFORE bombs fall. Full stop," posted Rep. Jim Himes, (D-Conn).

"It is so grossly unconstitutional," said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) at a rally after hearing the news. "The only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress, the president does not have the right."

Senator Tim Kaine, (D-Va.) has proposed a Senate version of the War Powers bill which was supposed to get a vote this week. "The American public is overwhelmingly opposed to the U.S. waging war on Iran. And the Israeli Foreign Minister admitted yesterday that Israeli bombing had set the Iranian nuclear program back 'at least 2 or 3 years,'" he posted on X on Saturday. "So what made Trump recklessly decide to rush and bomb today? Horrible judgment. I will push for all Senators to vote on whether they are for this third idiotic Middle East war."

Of course congratulations have already been streaming in from the hawkish members of Congress on both sides of the political aisle, especially pertinent committee chairmen and ranking members.

"Our commander-in-chief has made a deliberate — and correct— decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime," said Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS), chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. "We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies and stability for the middle-east. Well-done to our military personnel. You're the best!"

Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho) said this won't be a forever war and won't involve American boots on the ground, but Trump was right to take "decisive action" because disarming Iran is "for the good of the world."

“We stand with Israel tonight and pray for the safety of its people and the success of this unilateral, defensive action.”

Interest groups including the Republican Jewish Coalition and AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) that have been pushing for this war were quick to thank Trump tonight.

"Today’s successful, targeted military action proves once again that nobody has been tougher on Tehran, or a better friend to Israel, than President Trump," exclaimed the RJC, one of Trump's biggest campaign supporters.

"Tonight will go down in the history books as one of the most consequential orders ever given by a U.S. President. God speed to our heroic war fighters."

Article is being updated as story develops


To photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump walks with Col. Paul R. Pawluk, Vice Commander for the 89th Airlift Wing, before boarding Marine One at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, U.S., June 21, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno
Reporting | Middle East
Lockheed Martin NASA
Top photo credit: Lockheed Martin Space Systems in Littleton, Colo. Photo Credit: (NASA/Joel Kowsky)

The Pentagon spent $4 trillion over 5 years. Contractors got 54% of it.

Military Industrial Complex

Advocates of ever-higher Pentagon spending frequently argue that we must throw more money at the department to “support the troops.” But recent budget proposals and a new research paper issued by the Quincy Institute and the Costs of War Project at Brown University suggest otherwise.

The paper, which I co-authored with Stephen Semler, found that 54% of the Pentagon’s $4.4 trillion in discretionary spending from 2020 to 2024 went to military contractors. The top five alone — Lockheed Martin ($313 billion), RTX (formerly Raytheon, $145 billion), Boeing ($115 billion), General Dynamics ($116 billion), and Northrop Grumman ($81 billion) – received $771 billion in Pentagon contracts over that five year period.

keep readingShow less
China Malaysia
Top photo credit: Pearly Tan and Thinaah Muralitharan of Malaysia compete in the Women's Doubles Round Robin match against Nami Matsuyama and Chiharu Shida of Japan on day five of the BWF Sudirman Cup Finals 2025 at Fenghuang Gymnasium on May 1, 2025 in Xiamen, Fujian Province of China. (Photo by Zheng Hongliang/VCG )

How China is 'eating our lunch' with soft power

Asia-Pacific

In June 2025, while U.S. and Philippine forces conducted joint military drills in the Sulu Sea and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reaffirmed America’s commitment to the Indo-Pacific at Singapore’s Shangri-La Dialogue, another story deserving of attention played out less visibly.

A Chinese-financed rail project broke ground in Malaysia with diplomatic fanfare and local celebration. As Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim noted, the ceremony “marks an important milestone” in bilateral cooperation. The contrast was sharp: Washington sent ships and speeches; Beijing sent people and money.

keep readingShow less
President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev and President of Russia Vladimir Putin
Top photo credit: President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev and President of Russia Vladimir Putin appear on screen. (shutterstock/miss.cabul)

Westerners foolishly rush to defend Azerbaijan against Russia

Europe

The escalating tensions between Russia and Azerbaijan — marked by tit-for-tat arrests, accusations of ethnic violence, and economic sparring — have tempted some Western observers to view the conflict as an opportunity to further isolate Moscow.

However, this is not a simple narrative of Azerbaijan resisting Russian dominance. It is a complex struggle over energy routes, regional influence, and the future of the South Caucasus, where Western alignment with Baku risks undermining critical priorities, including potential U.S.-Russia engagement on Ukraine and arms control.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.