Follow us on social

Trump Joint Base Andrews

Trump: We 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program, and now, 'peace'

President announces strikes on three nuclear facilities and claims victory. Lawmakers on both sides, react.

Reporting | Middle East

President Donald Trump told the American people tonight in a brief address to the nation that Iran's nuclear program has been ""completely totally obliterated" after U.S. airstrikes on Iran overnight into Sunday morning, Tehran time.

He congratulated Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who launched Israel's strikes against Iran on June 13 and has been asking for U.S. assistance ever since. "We have worked as a team like no team has worked together before."

According to Trump and confirmed by reports earlier, the mountain facility at Fordo was struck, as well as the enrichment plant at Natanz, as well as a another site at Isfahan. The strikes were carried out in part by B-2s, which can carry payloads of 30,000-pound "bunker buster" bombs. Later reports indicated that dozens of bunker busters were used on Fordo and Natanz, and that Navy submarines fired 30 TLAM cruise missiles at the Natanz and Isfahan sites.

Trump praised the "brilliant military minds" who helped plan the successful attacks — "the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades."

The said now there "will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran, far greater for Iran than we have witnessed in the last many days," he added, noting there "are many other targets." He then proceeded to say "God Bless the Middle East, God Bless Israel" and then blessed the U.S. military.

His remarks came after he first announced the strikes around 8 PM EST on his Truth Social account:

  


Adam Weinstein, a Quincy Institute Middle East fellow who served as a combat Marine in Afghanistan, said the U.S. has now officially put the 40,000 troops in the Middle East in harm's way, a warning that many had tried to convey to the president and administration all week in the run up to tonight's action.

"You’ve put every U.S. troop and embassy in the region at risk and squandered America’s diplomatic leverage—though you’ll likely think you’ve strengthened it."

Some of the biggest MAGA supporters who had been against U.S. war with Iran have so far not moved.

“Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war,” posted Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has been among the most vocal in the run up to the strikes.

“There would not be bombs falling on the people of Israel if Netanyahu had not dropped bombs on the people of Iran first. Israel is a nuclear armed nation. This is not our fight. Peace is the answer”

Lawmakers pounced on the fact the president did not have Congressional authorization to attack, knowing that there was no imminent threat to the country.

“This is not Constitutional,” posted Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky), who had been vocalizing opposition to the strikes and had proposed legislation to stop them.

When Speaker Mike Johnson posted that the Congress did not have time to authorize because leaders "knew" the country was in "imminent danger" (he points to the nuclear weapons that don't yet exist and accuses Iran of being the "world's largest state sponsor of terrorism"), Massie shot back: "Why didn’t you call us back from vacation to vote on military action if there was a serious threat to our country?"

Rep. Warren Davidson, (R-Ohio), also a veteran, urged caution. "While President Trump’s decision may prove just, it’s hard to conceive a rationale that’s Constitutional. I look forward to his remarks tonight."

"According to the Constitution we are both sworn to defend, my attention to this matter comes BEFORE bombs fall. Full stop," posted Rep. Jim Himes, (D-Conn).

"It is so grossly unconstitutional," said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) at a rally after hearing the news. "The only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress, the president does not have the right."

Senator Tim Kaine, (D-Va.) has proposed a Senate version of the War Powers bill which was supposed to get a vote this week. "The American public is overwhelmingly opposed to the U.S. waging war on Iran. And the Israeli Foreign Minister admitted yesterday that Israeli bombing had set the Iranian nuclear program back 'at least 2 or 3 years,'" he posted on X on Saturday. "So what made Trump recklessly decide to rush and bomb today? Horrible judgment. I will push for all Senators to vote on whether they are for this third idiotic Middle East war."

Of course congratulations have already been streaming in from the hawkish members of Congress on both sides of the political aisle, especially pertinent committee chairmen and ranking members.

"Our commander-in-chief has made a deliberate — and correct— decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime," said Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS), chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. "We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies and stability for the middle-east. Well-done to our military personnel. You're the best!"

Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho) said this won't be a forever war and won't involve American boots on the ground, but Trump was right to take "decisive action" because disarming Iran is "for the good of the world."

“We stand with Israel tonight and pray for the safety of its people and the success of this unilateral, defensive action.”

Interest groups including the Republican Jewish Coalition and AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) that have been pushing for this war were quick to thank Trump tonight.

"Today’s successful, targeted military action proves once again that nobody has been tougher on Tehran, or a better friend to Israel, than President Trump," exclaimed the RJC, one of Trump's biggest campaign supporters.

"Tonight will go down in the history books as one of the most consequential orders ever given by a U.S. President. God speed to our heroic war fighters."

Article is being updated as story develops


To photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump walks with Col. Paul R. Pawluk, Vice Commander for the 89th Airlift Wing, before boarding Marine One at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, U.S., June 21, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno
Reporting | Middle East
Not Blackwater or Wagner, Americans in Gaza are 100% mercenaries
Top photo credit: Times of India/You Tube/Screengrab: US contractors deployed in Gaza in February 2025.

Not Blackwater or Wagner, Americans in Gaza are 100% mercenaries

Military Industrial Complex

Americans working for a little known U.S.-based private military contractor have begun to come forward to media and members of Congress with charges that their work has involved using live ammunition for crowd control and other abusive measures against unarmed civilians seeking food at controversial food distribution sites run by the Global Humanitarian Fund (GHF) in Gaza.

UG Solutions was hired by the GHF to secure and deliver food into Gaza. The GHF, with the help of the PMCs claims to have provided nearly 100 million meals to Gaza. Israel put GHF in control of what used to be the UN-led aid mission.

keep readingShow less
Trump was right to block Taiwan president's transit through US
Top photo credit: Lai Ching-te (William Lai), the President of Taiwan pose with soldier during his inspection of the Navy's Taiwan-built Xu Jiang stealth missile corvettes in Keelung, Taiwan, in July 13, 2024. (JamesonWu1972/Shutterstock)

Trump was right to block Taiwan president's transit through US

Asia-Pacific

Earlier this week, the Financial Times reported that the Trump administration denied permission for Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te to transit the U.S. en route to his diplomatic trip to Latin America. The U.S. decision eventually led Lai to cancel his trip, according to the report.

The Trump administration’s blocking of Lai’s stopover has drawn criticism across Washington’s foreign policy establishment, including from think tank experts and former officials. Some critics stress the moral inadequacy of the decision, arguing that the U.S. should not be turning its back on Taiwan, a longtime democratic friend, particularly when the island is subject to increasing diplomatic and military pressure from China. Others point to the danger of eroding deterrence; that is, how Washington’s decision might signal weakness and embolden Beijing at a critical moment.

keep readingShow less
Ron Paul (R-Tx.) and John McCain (R-Az.)
Top Image Credit: US presidential candidate US Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) (L) makes his point as US Senator John McCain (R-AZ ) adjusts his shirt collar as they take part in the CNN/Los Angeles Times Republican presidential debate at Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California January 30, 2008. Air Force One used by Reagan is in background. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith (UNITED STATES) US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2008 (USA)

How Ron Paul took a battering ram to GOP foreign policy

Washington Politics

Ron Paul is turning 90 on August 20. At 72, he was a revolutionary.

Today, there is a raucous foreign policy debate within the Republican Party. Populist, realist and libertarian “America First” Republicans argue against endless wars and for fiscal responsibility, while holdover hawks continue to insist on a robust U.S. hand and military presence anywhere they can get it, no matter the cost.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.