Follow us on social

POGO

From barracks to battleships, cost control is MIA

This week in The Bunker: New Navy chief stunned over cost of new barracks compared to the luxury Hawaiian hotel his company built

Analysis | Military Industrial Complex

The Bunker appears originally at the Project on Government Oversight and is republished here with permission.


Keys to the Kingdom

John Phelan, freshly-minted as secretary of the Navy on March 25, has no experience building ships. Or, for that matter, in the military. So when he recently tried to figure out how smartly the sea service buys stuff, he turned to something he does know: real estate. “I see numbers on things that are eye-opening to me. … I see a barracks that costs $2.5 million a key [per room],” he said April 9, after two weeks on the job. “My old firm, we built the finest hotel in Hawaii … for $800,000 a key, and that has some pretty nice marble and some pretty nice things in it, and I’m trying to understand how we can get to those numbers.” His audience of Navy officials and contractors tittered nervously.

Well, they should be nervous. Navy shipbuilding has been rotting for years, with sailors and taxpayers footing the bill:

  • The USS Gerald R. Ford carrier was delivered incomplete and 32 months late in 2017. The second Ford-class carrier, the USS John F. Kennedy, is facing “critical challenges” that will likely delay its planned July delivery date. The next in line, the USS Enterprise, will be 28 months behind schedule if delivered as planned in 2030. And prices aren’t falling: The JFK is now projected to cost $12.9 billion, the Enterprise $13.5 billion, and the Doris Miller, the fourth carrier in the class slated for delivery in 2032, $14 billion (planes not included).
  • The lead boat in the Columbia class of nuclear-armed submarines, the most critical leg of the nation’s nuclear triad, is facing a delivery delay of up to 18 months.

  • Only 10% of the lead frigate in the new Constellation class is finished, almost five years after the Navy awarded the contract for its construction. It is based on a European warship. The Navy hoped its version would share 85% of that vessel’s design. But it now has only 15%. Delivery of the first ship has slipped from 2026 to 2029, and its cost has ballooned from $1 billion to $1.4 billion.

Phelan said the Navy’s “gold-plated requirements” and other procurement pathologies fuel such fiascos. “I understand the Navy has its own ways of doing things, steeped in tradition and often inflexible,” he said. “Those ways, when they are dysfunctional, must be confronted daily and relentlessly in order to change.”

Only one thing missing, Lauren C. Williams at Defense Onenoted: “Phelan didn’t say how he would curb shipbuilding cost overruns and delays.”

You can bet top Navy officers will surely sound “Battle stations!” over Phelan’s offensive against how they do business. But whether they end up as his allies or his adversaries remains an unknown “bogey” on the Navy’s institutional radar screen.

World’s costliest chopping block

On April 9, the White House gave the Pentagon 90 days to come up with a list of weapons programs that are at least 15% over budget or behind schedule for potential termination. You know, because we’re getting too little bang for our bucks. That came two days after President Trump said his administration has approved a $1 trillion defense budget for 2026, which represents a 18% boost over its current $850 billion level. “We are very cost conscious,” he said, “but the military is something that we have to build and we have to be strong because you have a lot of bad forces out there now.”

That’s kind of like telling your kids to tighten their belts while you’re boosting their allowance. Needless to say, this isn’t how human nature — in the Defense Department, or anywhere else — actually works. But when you’ve a bureaucracy as hidebound and lethargic as the Pentagon, maybe you have to force-feed and starve it at the same time.

A White House fact sheet accompanying the order cited nine — nine! — Navy ship-building programs and the Air Force’s new Sentinel Intercontinental Ballistic Missile as poor performers. There are dozens of other programs that also qualify for the ax.

The Bunker, like others, cheers Trump’s push to buy weapons better. But while we’ve covered a lot of wars, we’ve covered even more Pentagon and presidential pushes for smarter procurement. Unfortunately, his marching order basically reads like he wants to spend more, on more of the same things, more quickly. “Given all the money we spend on the Pentagon,” Trump said, “it’s unacceptable that we would ever run out of ammunition or be unable to quickly produce the weapons needed.”

Aha! Now that gets to the heart of the matter. Until the nation demands simpler and cheaper ammo and weapons, it will never have enough of either.

Antipersonnel landmines return

Bad things come in threes. So if nuclear proliferation is on the rise, and the U.S. is pushing to deploy weapons in space, it should come as no surprise that antipersonnel landmines are making a comeback. Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine is leading front-line NATO states Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland to abandon a 1997 convention banning them.

Moscow has seeded millions of landmines inside Ukraine, making it the world’s most-mined nation. Such weapons, designed to kill troops, too often shred innocent civilians during conflicts and long after those conflicts are over. While 164 nations have signed the treaty, Russia — like China, India, Pakistan, and the U.S. — has not. The Trump administration is weakening demining operations by cutting foreign aid. Nonetheless, the pact has eliminated more than 40 million stockpiled antipersonnel mines and sharply reduced their production and use.

Even so, the treaty withdrawals do present ominous opportunities. A Finnish company has said it is ready to resume mine production to help defend Finland’s 830-mile border with Russia. And it no doubt will mean more work for Ronin and his fellow African giant pouched rats. Guinness World Records declared Cambodian-based Ronin the most successful rat mine-finder of all time on April 4 — International Day for Mine Awareness and Assistance in Mine Action, as well as World Rat Day.

Rah-rah Ronin the Rodent!

In these grim times, we’ll take our good news wherever we can find it.

Here’s what has caught The Bunker’s eye recently

The Republicans and the Russians

Jonathan Mahler ponders in the April 12 New York Times Magazine why Trump’s White House fell for Putin’s Kremlin. Hint: It’s been a long time coming.

Plane speaking…

Ex-Air Force boss Frank Kendall questions the Pentagon’s recent decision to make the Boeing F-47 the nation’s first sixth-generation fighter in Defense News April 9.

Is this supposed to be a good thing?

The Army now has robots that “think, talk, understand like soldiers,” Kapil Kajal reported April 10 in Interesting Engineering.

Thanks for trying to understand The Bunker this week. Consider forwarding this on to those who might want to subscribe here.


Top image credit: Project on Government Oversight
Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
Merz Macron Starmer Zelensky
Top image credit: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, Ukranian President Voloydmyr Zelensky, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk walk in the grounds of the Mariynsky Palace, in Kyiv, Ukraine, May 10, 2025. Ludovic Marin/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

Europe's sticks are a little limp

Europe

As the Istanbul peace talks get underway, Europe’s response to the Russia-Ukraine war exposes its profound weakness and reliance on U.S. support, with leaders like France’s Emmanuel Macron, Britain’s Keir Starmer, and Germany’s Friedrich Merz resorting to bluffs that lack substance.

The European trio, after visiting Kyiv and meeting with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on May 10, issued Russia a 30-day ceasefire ultimatum to begin on May 12, threatening severe sanctions in case of Moscow’s non-compliance. Russian President Vladimir Putin dismissed it, offering talks in Istanbul without a truce instead, in line with Russia’s insistence that the “root causes” of the conflict be addressed, including Ukraine’s potential NATO membership.

keep readingShow less
russia holds the cards
Top photo credit: okanakdeniz/shutterstock

Istanbul 2.0: Know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em

Europe

The biggest achievement of today’s Istanbul talks is that they are even taking place. U.S. engagement will remain vital to getting a peace deal over the line. Russia’s desire for a reset with Washingtonmay keep them on track.

I have a sense of déjà vu as I contemplate these long-overdue peace talks between Ukraine and Russia in Istanbul. In April 2022, Ukraine and Russia were close to agreeing a peace treaty, less than two months after war started. However, this came crashing down amid claims that western governments, in particular the United States and the United Kingdom encouraged Ukraine to keep fighting.

keep readingShow less
The desperation of Gaza famine denialism
Top photo credit: Dislocated Palestinians wait in line with pots in their hands to receive relief meals from a charity kitchen in Gaza City, on May 3, 2025. (Photo by Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto)

The desperation of Gaza famine denialism

Middle East

As the risk of famine spreads across Gaza — and as shocking images of overcrowded soup lines stream from Gaza daily — an influential network of Israeli government defenders has emerged to tell you that none of this is happening at all.

The Free Press — a pro-Israel media outlet often sympathetic to the neoconservative worldview — published a highly circulated article last week from journalist Michael Ames titled, “The Gaza Famine Myth,” which purports to demonstrate that food security in Gaza has been far above the famine and crisis levels that international humanitarian organizations have observed since at least early 2024.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.