Follow us on social

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)

Sanders bills to kill Israel arms transfers die in two Senate votes

'At a time when Israeli soldiers are shooting civilians trying to get food aid on a near-daily basis, the United States should not be providing more weapons to Israeli security forces'

Reporting | QiOSK

UPDATE 7/30 10:15 P.M.: The Senate rejected the motions to discharge S.J.Res.34 and S.J.Res.41 from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for immediate consideration on the Senate floor, voting 24-73 and 27-70 respectively.

Although these resolutions failed, they received more votes to discharge than previous resolutions to block arms sales to Israel. The Senate overwhelmingly rejected two other Sanders-led resolutions to block weapons to Israel back in April, voting against S.J. Res. 33 in a 15-82 vote and against S.J. Res. 26 in a 15-83 vote.


As hunger mounts in the Gaza Strip because of Israel’s war and repeated blocks of aid to it, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is mounting a new effort to block U.S. arms to Israel.

First, Sanders is forcing a vote in the Senate on July 30th to discharge two resolutions to block arms sales to Israel, S.J.Res.34 and S.J.Res.41, from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. S.J. Res.34 blocks the sale of some bombs and some of the logistics and technical support services related to them, and S.J.Res.41 blocks sales of tens of thousands of automatic rifles, to Israel.

“The time is long overdue for Congress to use the leverage we have — tens of billions in arms and military aid — to demand that Israel end these atrocities," Sen. Sanders said in a statement about the vote.

On Monday, Sanders also introduced another joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of exporting some weapons assistance to Israel.

No text of that resolution is available of yet, but Sen. Sanders' office told RS the Joint Resolution aims to block the sale of thousands of fully-automatic assault rifles (Transmittal No. DDTC 23–066), to police forces overseen by Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel's Minister of National Security, who has been distributing weapons to settlers in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

The legislation, S.J.Res.70, was referred yesterday to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, though it is unclear when it will be considered there.

In a statement to RS about S.J.Res.70, Sanders' office said that the U.S. should not send Israeli security forces more arms.

"Extremist minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who has long advocated for the forcible expulsion of Palestinians from the region, has been convicted by an Israeli court of racist incitement and supporting the Kahanist terror organization, and has been distributing weapons to violent settlers in the West Bank," Sanders' office told RS.

"At a time when Israeli soldiers are shooting civilians trying to get food aid on a near-daily basis, the United States should not be providing more weapons to Israeli security forces."

Lawmakers appear to be responding more actively to Gaza's humanitarian crisis, and of reports of starvation on the ground there. On Sunday, Democrats signed a letter to the State Department calling for the closure of the Global Humanitarian Fund, which has been accused of “blurring the lines between delivery of aid and security operations.” Over a thousand Palestinians have been killed trying to get food at or near GHF distribution centers. The Senators asked that humanitarian aid delivery be returned to the UN in the Gaza Strip.

Sen. Sanders has previously introduced similar joint resolutions of disapproval to block the sale or export of weapons to Israel. These have failed to pass. An amendment by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) to the 2026 Department of Defense Appropriations Act, which would have withheld additional military assistance to Israel, also failed earlier this month.

This is a developing story that has been updated.


Top Image Credit: Bernie Sanders speaks at 20/20's Criminal Justice Forum which was held at Allen University (Photo: Crush Rush via shutterstock)
Reporting | QiOSK
Pacific Island Forum
Top photo credit: Pacific Island Forum, Special Forum Economic Ministers Meeting, March 2025 (Flickr/Pacific Island Forum)

Special Forum Economic Officials Meeting

Not wanted: US, China barred from major Pacific Island summit

Asia-Pacific

Pacific Island leaders are pushing back against the rising geopolitical jousting between big powers in their region by barring international development partners, including the U.S. and China, from their annual summit this week.

Beginning Monday, Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele will host this year’s five-day meeting of leaders from the 18 Pacific Island Forum member countries, including Australia and New Zealand, in his country’s capital, Honiara. On the agenda will be topics of regional concern, from development and security to climate change and governance.

keep readingShow less
China's big military parade wasn't a coronation
Top image credit: BEIJING, CHINA - SEPTEMBER 03: The airborne unmanned warfare formation attends V-Day military parade to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War on September 3, 2025 in Beijing, China. (Photo by VCG/VCG via REUTERS)

China's big military parade wasn't a coronation

Asia-Pacific

The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Beijing this week and the military parade that accompanied it have triggered an outpouring of global commentary. Many analysts, especially those critical of the West or writing from the Middle East, have portrayed the parade as proof that China is on its way to replacing the United States as the next superpower. In this reading, the decline of American primacy will give birth to a Chinese century.

Yet this interpretation is both misleading and unhelpful. The parade did not mark the transfer of unipolar dominance from Washington to Beijing. Rather, it highlighted how China seeks to consolidate its position as a central pole in a world that is already multipolar.

keep readingShow less
Let’s be totally honest, it should be the ‘Department of War’
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and President Donald Trump (Shutterstock/Joey Sussman) and old Department of War seal, decommissioned in 1947. (Wikimedia commons)

Let’s be totally honest, it should be the ‘Department of War’

Military Industrial Complex

There are reports that President Donald Trump will announce the change from the Department of Defense back to its old name, the Department of War, today.

(Editor's note: an executive order changing the name was publicly signed by President Trump in the White House on Friday.)

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.