Follow us on social

google cta
Senate votes to lift crippling sanctions on Syria

Senate votes to lift crippling sanctions on Syria

Questions remain about whether the repeal is 'clean'—and whether the House will follow suit

Reporting | Washington Politics
google cta
google cta

The Senate has voted to repeal the Caesar sanctions, which have imposed harsh restrictions on the Syrian economy since 2020, in a move welcomed by many lawmakers and experts on Syria.

The decision was buried in the Senate's annual defense policy bill, which passed in a 77-20 vote late Thursday. The news marks a major step forward for Syria, which has struggled to rebuild as sanctions continue to scare off needed investment despite President Donald Trump's stated desire to remove them.

Notably, the provision was not included in the House's version of the defense policy bill, meaning that it risks being removed in conference due to continued opposition to a clean repeal from many members of the House. Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.), who has supported lifting sanctions on Syria since the fall of the Assad regime in December 2024, called for a full lifting of sanctions.

"These very severe sanctions were imposed on a regime which, thankfully, no longer exists," Wilson wrote on X. "Syria's success now depends on FULL and TOTAL repeal."

As RS reported earlier this week, the repeal came through a compromise between Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.). While Graham initially pushed to maintain the sanctions in order to pressure Syria's new government, he agreed after negotiations to a more modest proposal, which immediately removes the sanctions but requires the president to report to Congress about Syria's progress on various issues related to human rights and terrorism.

A Democratic congressional aide told RS that the Senate's repeal, while not fully "clean," amounted to a compromise that everyone involved can "live with." The staffer pointed to the fact that the law includes no "snapback" provision and would only indicate that it is the "sense of Congress" that sanctions should be reimposed if the Syrian government fails to make progress on human rights benchmarks.

The aide acknowledged that the provision, even if accepted by the House, may not be enough to encourage investors to take the risk of contributing to Syrian reconstruction, which is expected to cost as much as $400 billion. "There will still be a significant amount of hesitation because the word Caesar is still in there," the person said.

Sanctions continue to strangle the Syrian economy despite President Donald Trump's efforts to remove them, as RS reported in an essay earlier this week following this reporter's trip to Syria.

If the House joins the Senate in repealing Caesar, it will represent a major step toward encouraging investment. But, as Aaron Zelin of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy noted on X, some other sanctions still remain in place, including the designation of Syria's government as a state sponsor of terror.

Trump has the authority to repeal this designation unilaterally and is eventually expected to do so. But he has so far only ordered the State Department to review Syria's status as a sponsor of terrorism.

Syrian Finance Minister Mohammed Yisr Barnieh celebrated the Senate vote Friday and thanked Syrian diplomats for helping to make the argument for repeal. “This is a clear message to those who doubt Syria’s future that, with God’s help, Syria is [moving] toward stability, flourishing, and development,” Barnieh wrote on Facebook.


Top image credit: Destroyed buildings in the Jobar neighborhood of Damascus, Syria. (Connor Echols/Responsible Statecraft)
google cta
Reporting | Washington Politics
Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?
Top image credit: Sens. Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) sit look on during a congressional hearing in January, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Sipa USA)

Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?

Washington Politics

On Wednesday, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) told CNN that he would support new funding for the U.S. war with Iran — but only if Israel and Arab Gulf states help pay for it.

“We’re using our taxpayer money to protect those countries,” Gallego said. “We’re using our men to protect these countries. They need to throw in and have skin in the game too.”

keep readingShow less
Polymarket Iran War
Top photo credit: Polymarket logo (Shutterstock/PJ McDonald) and Scene following an airstrike on an Iranian police centre damaging residential buildings around it in Niloofar square in central Tehran on march 1, 2026. (Hamid Vakili/Parspix/ABACAPRESS.COM)

Prediction markets are a national security threat

Latest

Hours before an Israeli attack in Tehran killed Ayatollah Khamenei, an account on the prediction market Polymarket made over half a million dollars wagering that Iran’s Supreme Leader would vacate office before 3/31. That account, named “Magamyman,” was not the only one to cash in on the attacks.

Half a dozen Polymarket accounts made over $1.2M betting that the U.S. “strikes Iran by February 28, 2026.” Those accounts were allegedly paid for through cryptocurrency wallets that had previously not been funded prior to Feb. 27. Overall, prediction market users bet over $255M on markets related to the attacks in Iran on the prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket alone.

keep readingShow less
Indonesia stock exchange
Top photo credit: (Shutterstock/Triawanda Tirta Aditya)

Trump's ‘move fast and break things’ war slams into economy

Middle East

The launch of joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran could lead to economic and financial disruptions that ripple across the countries of the Global South with devastating effects. And while a quick end to the war could dampen these effects, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has acknowledged that the war could even last up to 8 weeks, and Israel is now reportedly expecting a "weeks-long" war with Iran.

The fundamental issue here seems to be an increasingly expansive vision of American — and particularly Israeli — war aims. These have now gone well beyond Iran’s offer of substantial denuclearization to regime change, and some quarters have even more extreme visions like the potential Balkanization of Iran into multiple statelets. Such mission creep on the part of the U.S. and Israel has in turn changed incentive structures in Iran towards an expansion of the conflict to target both the Gulf States and global oil markets, a dynamic that threatens to broaden the conflict and extend it, with profound impacts on the global economy.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.