Follow us on social

google cta
ukraine war

Russia makes substantial gains in Ukraine’s east

Kyiv is faced with troop shortages, while North Korean soldiers are sent to assist Moscow

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

October of 2024 was the most militarily successful month for Russia since July of 2022. After months of sustained pressure, and mostly stagnant front lines, Russian troops have broken through and made significant gains in the Donbas region of Ukraine. According to the New York Times, Russian forces have secured more than 160 square miles there, and are capturing strategic towns along the way.

It seems as though the next goal for Russians in the Donbas is to take the strategic rail town, Pokrovsk, which would seriously inhibit Ukraine’s ability to resupply its forces in the region. Encirclement of this strategic city is likely as Ukraine has likely lost Selydove this week, a city which is only about 20 miles south of Pokrovsk.

Experts say Russia’s advances this past month are due to several factors. Analyst at the French Foundation for Strategic Research, Vincent Tourret, says that Ukraine is losing ground due to Russia’s use of powerful guided missiles, and Ukraine’s lack of fortifications in the region. According to Tourret, “Ukraine’s defenses are more and more battered, the terrain is more and more favorable for Russian offensives and, on top of that, the Russians have a better impact, the three factors combine to explain the increase in Russian gains.”

These losses, combined with reports that Ukrainian forces are overstretched, and the fact that North Korean soldiers are now present in the conflict do not bode well for Kyiv. Additionally, Ukraine is suffering from a lack of manpower, as well as low morale among its existing soldiers. To combat this, Kyiv has introduced a new mobilization drive, hoping to recruit an additional 160,000 soldiers.

Other Ukraine News This Week:

According to Reuters, the Pentagon has declared that Ukraine would not gain additional permissions for the use of American weapons as a result of North Korean soldiers being deployed to Russia. Pentagon officials said on Monday that 10,000 North Korean troops had been deployed to eastern Russia for training, up from an estimate of 3,000 troops last Wednesday.

“In response, allies must scale up military support for Ukraine,” Ukrainian Foreign Minister, Andrii Sybiha said. “Lift restrictions on long-range strikes. Start intercepting Russian missiles and drones over Ukraine. Extend invitation to NATO. Boost investment in Ukraine’s arms manufacturing.”

For its part, the DPRK is defending its decision to assist Russia militarily. At a U.N. Security Council Meeting on Wednesday, DPRK Ambassador Kim Song asserted the nations’ right to “develop bilateral relations in all fields.”

South Korea has begun to strengthen its ties with Ukraine as a response to North Korean support of Moscow. Reuters reports that the countries are stepping up cooperation and intelligence sharing to develop future countermeasures against Pyongyang. This comes after weeks of increased hostility between the two Koreas, with North Korea demolishing connecting roads to its southern neighbor earlier this month. In addition to intelligence sharing, South Korea is contemplating sending weapons to Kyiv for the first time, which could transform the Ukrainian battlefield into a proxy conflict between Pyongyang and Seoul.

The United States unveiled a new round of sanctions on Wednesday, focusing on almost 400 individuals and entities who were accused of aiding Moscow’s war machine. According to the Agence France Presse, Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo said, "the United States and our allies will continue to take decisive action across the globe to stop the flow of critical tools and technologies that Russia needs to wage its illegal and immoral war against Ukraine.”

From the State Department Briefing on Oct. 28:

Spokesperson Matthew Miller was asked about the reports of North Korean soldiers in Russia, and if he knew how close they were to Kursk. Miller said that they were aware of around 10,000 soldiers who were sent to Russia but could not disclose if they knew how close they were to Kursk. He did say, however, that, “we have over the last few days seen a portion of those 10,000 groups move west, closer to Ukraine, In terms of an assessment, we’re concerned that they intend to use them to fight or to support combat operations against Ukrainian forces in Kursk.”

From the State Department Briefing on Oct. 29:

Spokesperson Miller confirmed that the State Department believed that Russia was violating international law by training North Korean troops, even though the nations have a mutual military treaty. Miller said that the United States and its partners will be evaluating the potential for new sanctions and that US delegations will continue to be sent to Kyiv.

From the State Department Briefing on Oct. 30:

A reporter asked Miller if the US had any concerns over China’s lack of response to North Korea’s sending troops to Russia. He said that ultimately Chinese officials can speak for themselves, but that “we have engaged directly with officials with the Government of China to make quite clear our concerns about this deepening military relationship between Russia and North Korea, and to make clear that we think this ought to be a source of concern for China as well as other countries in the region.”

The Spokesperson also said that North Korean troops in Russia did not “complicate the situation” for NATO and its allies, but that that some allies, specifically South Korea, were concerned about the development.

When asked about Ukrainian President Zeleneksyy’s claim that only 10 percent of a promised aid package had arrived, Miller directed reporters to the Pentagon, saying that he could not comment on the topic.


Diplomacy Watch:
Diplomacy Watch: Ukraine and allies reeling as war heats up
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Dan Caine
Top photo credit: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Air Force Gen. Dan Caine conduct a press briefing on Operation Epic Fury at the Pentagon, Washington, D.C., March 4, 2026. (DoW photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Alexander Kubitza)

Did Caine just announce the Morgenthau option for Iran?

QiOSK

Gen. Dan Caine’s formulation of American war aims in Iran is remarkable not because it is bellicose, but because it is strategically incoherent.

In a press conference Tuesday morning, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff did not describe a limited campaign to suppress missile fire, blunt Iran’s naval threat, or even impose a severe but bounded setback on Tehran’s coercive instruments. He described a campaign against Iran’s “military and industrial base” designed to prevent the regime from attacking Americans, U.S. interests, and regional partners “for years to come.” In an earlier briefing he put the objective similarly: to prevent Iran from projecting power outside its borders. Rather than the language of a discrete coercive operation, this describes a war against a state’s capacity to regenerate power.

keep readingShow less
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.