Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch Donald Trump Putin Zelensky

Israel’s war testing Russia-Iran ties

Putin condemned the attack but has limited options

Reporting | QiOSK

After Russia lost a key ally in Syria’s Bashar al-Assad in late 2024, Iran, another Russian ally in the Middle East, is under attack. Israel began striking Iran a week ago, but Russia seems too bogged down or disinterested in providing direct support to Tehran.

Iranian and Russian parliaments recently approved a strategic pact that did not contain an explicit mutual defense clause but did include statements on working together against shared threats, sharing military and civilian nuclear technology, and creating further economic cooperation.

According to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, the agreement was described as a roadmap for the future. It also builds on an initial agreement from 2001, which began military cooperation and some intelligence sharing.

These agreements have not materialized into troops on the ground or military strikes thus far. Iran has not sent troops to fight in Ukraine, but Tehran has supplied much-needed Shahed drones for Russia to use against the Ukrainians.

However, Iran is facing a direct attack from Israel, and so far, Russia has only offered statements of support and strategic warnings to the United States.

“Vladimir Putin condemned Israel's military operation against Iran and expressed serious concern about a possible escalation of the conflict, which would have unpredictable consequences for the entire situation in the Middle East,” said Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov.

Putin also offered to assist in diplomatic efforts between Israel and Iran, and Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov cautioned President Trump against directly joining the conflict, saying, “this would be a step that would radically destabilize the entire situation.”

With Russian forces still bogged down in Ukraine, the Russian president doesn't have a lot of options in terms of assisting Iran militarily, a move that would also risk souring relations with Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

Russian-Iranian relations expert Nikita Smagin at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace adds that “Russia, when it comes to Iran, must weigh the possibility of a clash with Israel and the United States, so saving Iran is obviously not worth it.”

Russia's risk of losing influence is substantial as it plays a balancing act in the Middle East. The Kremlin risks losing Tehran’s trust, but according to Smagin, Putin has not given the Iranians the military equipment they requested.

“Iran has been asking Russia for weapons for the last few years,” Smagin adds. “It has been asking for aircraft, it has been asking for air defense systems. Russia has given practically nothing.”

What is certain, according to Smagin, is that this conflict “leads to the weakening of Russia’s positions in the Middle East."


In other Russia-Ukraine War news this week

North Korea is sending 5,000 workers to Russia this week, according to the New York Times. The workers will help rebuild the war-torn region of Kursk. South Korean intelligence claims that there are already as many as 15,000 North Koreans employed in Russia.

According to the New York Times, Ukrainian President Volodimir Zelenskyy did not receive as much aid as he wanted at the G7 summit. Rather than focusing on Ukraine, G7 leaders released statements on the conflicts in the Middle East. Zeleneskyy was promised $1.7 billion in military aid from Canada, but nothing else from the United States, as Trump left early due to the Israel-Iran strikes.

Russia sent a deadly wave of drone attacks into Kyiv and Odesa on Tuesday. The BBC reports that 440 drones were sent, killing at least 30 and injuring over 100. Among the dead was an American citizen. The attack was the largest on Kyiv in five months.

From this week’s State Department press briefing:

A State Department Spokesperson confirmed the death of an American citizen in a Russian strike on Kyiv on Tuesday and condemned Russia’s recent round of attacks on Ukraine.


Top Photo Credit: Diplomacy Watch (Khody Akhavi)
Diplomacy Watch: Minerals deal to occur next week
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump ASEAN
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump looks at Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., next to Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim when posing for a family photo with leaders at the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 26, 2025. Vincent Thian/Pool via REUTERS

‘America First’ meets ‘ASEAN Way’ in Kuala Lumpur

Asia-Pacific

The 2025 ASEAN and East Asia Summits in Kuala Lumpur beginning today are set to be consequential multilateral gatherings — defining not only ASEAN’s internal cohesion but also the shape of U.S.–China relations in the Indo-Pacific.

President Donald Trump’s participation will be the first by a U.S. president in an ASEAN-led summit since 2022. President Biden skipped the last two such summits in 2023 and 2024, sending then-Vice President Harris instead.

keep readingShow less
iran, china, russia
Top photo credit: Top image credit: Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov and and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi shake hands as Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu looks on during their meet with reporters after their meeting at Diaoyutai State Guest House on March 14, 2025 in Beijing, China. Lintao Zhang/Pool via REUTERS

'Annulled'! Russia won't abide snapback sanctions on Iran

Middle East

“A raider attack on the U.N. Security Council.” This was the explosive accusation leveled by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov this week. His target was the U.N. Secretariat and Western powers, whom he blamed for what Russia sees as an illegitimate attempt to restore the nuclear-related international sanctions on Iran.

Beyond the fiery rhetoric, Ryabkov’s statement contained a message: Russia, he said, now considers all pre-2015 U.N. sanctions on Iran, snapped back by the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) — the United Kingdom, France, Germany — “annulled.” Moscow will deepen its military-technical cooperation with Tehran accordingly, according to Ryabkov.

This is more than a diplomatic spat; it is the formal announcement of a split in international legal reality. The world’s major powers are now operating under two irreconcilable interpretations of international law. On one side, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany assert that the sanctions snapback mechanism of the JCPOA was legitimately triggered for Iran’s alleged violations. On the other, Iran, Russia, and China reject this as an illegitimate procedural act.

This schism was not inevitable, and its origin reveals a profound incongruence. The Western powers that most frequently appeal to the sanctity of the "rules-based international order" and international law have, in this instance, taken an action whose effects fundamentally undermine it. By pushing through a legal maneuver that a significant part of the Security Council considers illegitimate, they have ushered the world into a new and more dangerous state. The predictable, if imperfect, framework of universally recognized Security Council decisions is being replaced by a system where legal facts are determined by political interests espoused by competing power blocs.

This rupture followed a deliberate Western choice to reject compromises in a stand-off with Iran. While Iran was in a technical violation of the provisions of the JCPOA — by, notably, amassing a stockpile of highly enriched uranium (up to 60% as opposed to the 3.67% for a civilian use permissible under the JCPOA), there was a chance to avert the crisis. In the critical weeks leading to the snapback, Iran had signaled concessions in talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Cairo, in terms of renewing cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s inspectors.

keep readingShow less
On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants
Top Photo Credit: (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants

Europe

While diplomats labored to produce the Dayton Accords in 1995, then-Secretary of Defense Bill Perry advised, “No agreement is better than a bad agreement.” Given that Washington’s allies in London, Paris, Berlin and Warsaw are opposed to any outcome that might end the war in Ukraine, no agreement may be preferable. But for President Trump, there is no point in equating the illusion of peace in Ukraine with a meaningless ceasefire that settles nothing.

Today, Ukraine is mired in corruption, starting at the very highest levels of the administration in Kyiv. Sending $175 billion of borrowed money there "for however long it takes" has turned out to be worse than reckless. The U.S. national sovereign debt is surging to nearly $38 trillion and rising by $425 billion with each passing month. President Trump needs to turn his attention away from funding Joe Biden’s wars and instead focus on the faltering American economy.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.