Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch Donald Trump Putin Zelensky

Israel’s war testing Russia-Iran ties

Putin condemned the attack but has limited options

Reporting | QiOSK

After Russia lost a key ally in Syria’s Bashar al-Assad in late 2024, Iran, another Russian ally in the Middle East, is under attack. Israel began striking Iran a week ago, but Russia seems too bogged down or disinterested in providing direct support to Tehran.

Iranian and Russian parliaments recently approved a strategic pact that did not contain an explicit mutual defense clause but did include statements on working together against shared threats, sharing military and civilian nuclear technology, and creating further economic cooperation.

According to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, the agreement was described as a roadmap for the future. It also builds on an initial agreement from 2001, which began military cooperation and some intelligence sharing.

These agreements have not materialized into troops on the ground or military strikes thus far. Iran has not sent troops to fight in Ukraine, but Tehran has supplied much-needed Shahed drones for Russia to use against the Ukrainians.

However, Iran is facing a direct attack from Israel, and so far, Russia has only offered statements of support and strategic warnings to the United States.

“Vladimir Putin condemned Israel's military operation against Iran and expressed serious concern about a possible escalation of the conflict, which would have unpredictable consequences for the entire situation in the Middle East,” said Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov.

Putin also offered to assist in diplomatic efforts between Israel and Iran, and Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov cautioned President Trump against directly joining the conflict, saying, “this would be a step that would radically destabilize the entire situation.”

With Russian forces still bogged down in Ukraine, the Russian president doesn't have a lot of options in terms of assisting Iran militarily, a move that would also risk souring relations with Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

Russian-Iranian relations expert Nikita Smagin at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace adds that “Russia, when it comes to Iran, must weigh the possibility of a clash with Israel and the United States, so saving Iran is obviously not worth it.”

Russia's risk of losing influence is substantial as it plays a balancing act in the Middle East. The Kremlin risks losing Tehran’s trust, but according to Smagin, Putin has not given the Iranians the military equipment they requested.

“Iran has been asking Russia for weapons for the last few years,” Smagin adds. “It has been asking for aircraft, it has been asking for air defense systems. Russia has given practically nothing.”

What is certain, according to Smagin, is that this conflict “leads to the weakening of Russia’s positions in the Middle East."


In other Russia-Ukraine War news this week

North Korea is sending 5,000 workers to Russia this week, according to the New York Times. The workers will help rebuild the war-torn region of Kursk. South Korean intelligence claims that there are already as many as 15,000 North Koreans employed in Russia.

According to the New York Times, Ukrainian President Volodimir Zelenskyy did not receive as much aid as he wanted at the G7 summit. Rather than focusing on Ukraine, G7 leaders released statements on the conflicts in the Middle East. Zeleneskyy was promised $1.7 billion in military aid from Canada, but nothing else from the United States, as Trump left early due to the Israel-Iran strikes.

Russia sent a deadly wave of drone attacks into Kyiv and Odesa on Tuesday. The BBC reports that 440 drones were sent, killing at least 30 and injuring over 100. Among the dead was an American citizen. The attack was the largest on Kyiv in five months.

From this week’s State Department press briefing:

A State Department Spokesperson confirmed the death of an American citizen in a Russian strike on Kyiv on Tuesday and condemned Russia’s recent round of attacks on Ukraine.


Top Photo Credit: Diplomacy Watch (Khody Akhavi)
Diplomacy Watch: Minerals deal to occur next week
Reporting | QiOSK
British Royal Navy
Top photo credit: Launch of Duncan on the Clyde in Scotland MOD, Royal Navy, 2010. (Ian Arthur/MOD/Wikimedia)

Secretary's remark that UK 'will fight' China is a dip into crazy town

Asia-Pacific

Having spent the past decade telling the British public that Russia poses the biggest ‘immediate threat’ to the United Kingdom, the idea that Britain should get ready to fight China is idiotic and irresponsible.

During a visit to Australia to join HMS Prince of Wales, which is currently leading Carrier Strike Group 25 to Asia, UK Defense Secretary John Healey implied that the UK might be willing to fight China in the Pacific over Taiwan. “If we have to fight, as we have done in the past, Australia and the UK are nations that will fight together. We exercise together and by exercising together and being more ready to fight, we deter better together.”

keep readingShow less
Gaza starvation children
Top photo credit: Palestinian children suffering from malnutrition receive medical care at Al-Rantisi Children's Hospital, July 24, 2025, Gaza. Photo by Omar Ashtawy apaimages Gaza city Gaza Strip Palestinian Territory 240725_Gaza_OSH_0014 Copyright: xapaimagesxOmarxAshtawyxxapaimagesx

This isn't a 'war' — Israel is destroying a population

Middle East

The prospects for negotiating a ceasefire and an end to the humanitarian disaster in the Gaza Strip appear as dim as ever. Israeli and U.S. representatives walked out of talks with Hamas in Qatar that had been mediated by the Qataris and Egyptians. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is talking about “alternative” means of achieving Israel’s goals in the territory.

President Donald Trump, echoing Netanyahu’s levying of blame on Hamas, asserted that “Hamas didn’t really want to make a deal. I think they want to die.” Trump went on to mention a need to “finish the job,” evidently referring to Israel’s continued devastating assault on the Strip and its residents.

keep readingShow less
Rafael Groosi , Abbas Araghchi , badr Abdelatty
Top photo credit: Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty meets with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Grossi in Cairo, Egypt, June 2, 2025. REUTERS/Mohamed Abd El Ghany

Are Iran and Egypt relations on the cusp of a 'seismic shift'?

Middle East

In the heart of old Cairo last month, one of the Middle East’s longest-running rifts was being publicly laid to rest.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, flanked by Egyptian officials, walked through Cairo’s historic Khan el-Khalili bazaar, prayed at the Al-Hussein Mosque, and dined with former Egyptian foreign ministers at the storied Naguib Mahfouz restaurant. Araghchi was unequivocal when he posted during his trip that Egyptian-Iranian relations had “entered a new phase.”

This visit was more than routine diplomacy, but a signal of a potentially seismic shift between two Middle Eastern powers, drawn together by the pull of shared crises.

The rupture began in 1979, when Iran’s revolutionary leaders severed diplomatic relations after Egyptian President Anwar Sadat signed the Camp David Accords with Israel — a betrayal in Tehran’s eyes. The schism deepened when Cairo granted asylum to the deposed Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who was just overthrown by a popular revolution which birthed a new Islamic Republic under the leadership of Ayatollah Khomeini. He died and was buried in Egypt in 1980.

During the Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988), Egypt’s material support for Saddam Hussein’s regime cemented Tehran’s view of Cairo as an antagonist. For decades thereafter, diplomatic relations remained frozen, with only intermittent and largely fruitless attempts at dialogue.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.