Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch Donald Trump Putin Zelensky

Israel’s war testing Russia-Iran ties

Putin condemned the attack but has limited options

Reporting | QiOSK

After Russia lost a key ally in Syria’s Bashar al-Assad in late 2024, Iran, another Russian ally in the Middle East, is under attack. Israel began striking Iran a week ago, but Russia seems too bogged down or disinterested in providing direct support to Tehran.

Iranian and Russian parliaments recently approved a strategic pact that did not contain an explicit mutual defense clause but did include statements on working together against shared threats, sharing military and civilian nuclear technology, and creating further economic cooperation.

According to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, the agreement was described as a roadmap for the future. It also builds on an initial agreement from 2001, which began military cooperation and some intelligence sharing.

These agreements have not materialized into troops on the ground or military strikes thus far. Iran has not sent troops to fight in Ukraine, but Tehran has supplied much-needed Shahed drones for Russia to use against the Ukrainians.

However, Iran is facing a direct attack from Israel, and so far, Russia has only offered statements of support and strategic warnings to the United States.

“Vladimir Putin condemned Israel's military operation against Iran and expressed serious concern about a possible escalation of the conflict, which would have unpredictable consequences for the entire situation in the Middle East,” said Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov.

Putin also offered to assist in diplomatic efforts between Israel and Iran, and Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov cautioned President Trump against directly joining the conflict, saying, “this would be a step that would radically destabilize the entire situation.”

With Russian forces still bogged down in Ukraine, the Russian president doesn't have a lot of options in terms of assisting Iran militarily, a move that would also risk souring relations with Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

Russian-Iranian relations expert Nikita Smagin at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace adds that “Russia, when it comes to Iran, must weigh the possibility of a clash with Israel and the United States, so saving Iran is obviously not worth it.”

Russia's risk of losing influence is substantial as it plays a balancing act in the Middle East. The Kremlin risks losing Tehran’s trust, but according to Smagin, Putin has not given the Iranians the military equipment they requested.

“Iran has been asking Russia for weapons for the last few years,” Smagin adds. “It has been asking for aircraft, it has been asking for air defense systems. Russia has given practically nothing.”

What is certain, according to Smagin, is that this conflict “leads to the weakening of Russia’s positions in the Middle East."


In other Russia-Ukraine War news this week

North Korea is sending 5,000 workers to Russia this week, according to the New York Times. The workers will help rebuild the war-torn region of Kursk. South Korean intelligence claims that there are already as many as 15,000 North Koreans employed in Russia.

According to the New York Times, Ukrainian President Volodimir Zelenskyy did not receive as much aid as he wanted at the G7 summit. Rather than focusing on Ukraine, G7 leaders released statements on the conflicts in the Middle East. Zeleneskyy was promised $1.7 billion in military aid from Canada, but nothing else from the United States, as Trump left early due to the Israel-Iran strikes.

Russia sent a deadly wave of drone attacks into Kyiv and Odesa on Tuesday. The BBC reports that 440 drones were sent, killing at least 30 and injuring over 100. Among the dead was an American citizen. The attack was the largest on Kyiv in five months.

From this week’s State Department press briefing:

A State Department Spokesperson confirmed the death of an American citizen in a Russian strike on Kyiv on Tuesday and condemned Russia’s recent round of attacks on Ukraine.


Top Photo Credit: Diplomacy Watch (Khody Akhavi)
Diplomacy Watch: Minerals deal to occur next week
Reporting | QiOSK
American Special Operations
Top image credit: (shutterstock/FabrikaSimf)

American cult: Why our special ops need a reset

Military Industrial Complex

This article is the latest installment in our Quincy Institute/Responsible Statecraft project series highlighting the writing and reporting of U.S. military veterans. Click here for more information.

America’s post-9/11 conflicts have left indelible imprints on our society and our military. In some cases, these changes were so gradual that few noticed the change, except as snapshots in time.

keep readingShow less
Recep Tayyip Erdogan Benjamin Netanyahu
Top photo credit: President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan (Shutterstock/ Mustafa Kirazli) and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Salty View/Shutterstock)
Is Turkey's big break with Israel for real?

Why Israel is now turning its sights on Turkey

Middle East

As the distribution of power shifts in the region, with Iran losing relative power and Israel and Turkey emerging on top, an intensified rivalry between Tel Aviv and Ankara is not a question of if, but how. It is not a question of whether they choose the rivalry, but how they choose to react to it: through confrontation or peaceful management.

As I describe in Treacherous Alliance, a similar situation emerged after the end of the Cold War: The collapse of the Soviet Union dramatically changed the global distribution of power, and the defeat of Saddam's Iraq in the Persian Gulf War reshuffled the regional geopolitical deck. A nascent bipolar regional structure took shape with Iran and Israel emerging as the two main powers with no effective buffer between them (since Iraq had been defeated). The Israelis acted on this first, inverting the strategy that had guided them for the previous decades: The Doctrine of the Periphery. According to this doctrine, Israel would build alliances with the non-Arab states in its periphery (Iran, Turkey, and Ethiopia) to balance the Arab powers in its vicinity (Iraq, Syria, and Egypt, respectively).

keep readingShow less
Havana, Cuba
Top Image Credit: Havana, Cuba, 2019. (CLWphoto/Shutterstock)

Trump lifted sanctions on Syria. Now do Cuba.

North America

President Trump’s new National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM) on Cuba, announced on June 30, reaffirms the policy of sanctions and hostility he articulated at the start of his first term in office. In fact, the new NSPM is almost identical to the old one.

The policy’s stated purpose is to “improve human rights, encourage the rule of law, foster free markets and free enterprise, and promote democracy” by restricting financial flows to the Cuban government. It reaffirms Trump’s support for the 1996 Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, which explicitly requires regime change — that Cuba become a multiparty democracy with a free market economy (among other conditions) before the U.S. embargo will be lifted.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.