Follow us on social

|

WSJ omits major Pompeo conflict of interest in 'Trump Peace Plan'

Surprise! The former Secretary of State and his co-writer could financially gain from this pro-Ukraine proposal

Reporting | Media

The plan reads like a wish list for the U.S. weapons industry and Ukrainian business interests: create a $500 billion “lend-lease” program for Ukraine to buy weapons, “bulk up America’s defense industry” and “swiftly admit Ukraine [to the European Union] and help it modernize and develop its economy.”

Those recommendations came from a board member of a major Ukrainian telecom company and the managing director of a D.C. lobby shop that counts a member of Ukraine’s parliament, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and the second largest weapons firm in the world, as clients.

But the plan, as presented in a Wall Street Journal op-ed last Thursday, wasn’t marketed as a lobbyist’s work for U.S. and Ukrainian companies, and the authors’ potential conflicts of interest weren’t disclosed. The board member of the Ukrainian telecom company, Kyivstar, was simply identified as “Mike Pompeo,” “Secretary of State, 2018-21.” And the lobbyist was identified as “David J. Urban,” “managing director at the BGR Group and of counsel at Torridon Law.”

The plan itself was presented as a “Trump Peace Plan for Ukraine,” though it is not clear whether Pompeo and Urban are speaking for trump or whether the former president has even seen their “plan.”

Meanwhile, the Journal chose not to make readers aware of Pompeo and Urban’s interests in the policies they were proposing — but public records and press releases provide ample documentation.

“I proudly join VEON and Kyivstar in their extraordinary service to the people of Ukraine by providing essential connectivity and digital services in health, education, business growth and entertainment. I also applaud Kyivstar’s parent company VEON for its leadership in investing in Ukraine with their own long-term commitment and their ‘Invest in Ukraine NOW!’ initiative,” said Pompeo in a November 14, 2023, press release announcing his new role as a board member at Kyivstar.

“It is through private enterprise and investments that Ukraine will secure its economic future and success, and I look forward to contributing to this laudable effort,” he added.

E.U. membership would almost certainly benefit Kyivstar and its shareholders, whose interests Pompeo is entrusted to protect.

Urban’s firm, BGR, registered as an agent for two foreign principals based in Ukraine in May 2022, providing pro-bono representation for Vadym Ivchenko, a member of Ukraine’s parliament, and Elena Lipkivska Ergul, an adviser to Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelenskiy.

BGR also has received a $120,000 contract this year to lobby on behalf of RTX (formerly known as Raytheon), the second largest weapons company in the world and whose CEO, Greg Hayes, promised investors in 2022 that “tensions in Eastern Europe,” among other hotpots, would provide significant upside for the company. “So I fully expect we’re going to see some benefit from it,” he said. Raytheon paid BGR $240,000 last year and Lockheed Martin, the largest weapons firm, paid the firm $70,000.

The Journal did not respond to a request for comment about whether they were aware of Urban and Pompeo’s potential conflicts of interest and, if so, why they chose to withhold this information from readers.


U.S. Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo delivers remarks to the traveling press at Al Batten Airport, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates on September 19, 2019. [State Department photo by Ron Przysucha]|
U.S. Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo delivers remarks to the traveling press at Al Batten Airport, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates on September 19, 2019. [State Department photo by Ron Przysucha]|
Reporting | Media
operating table
Top photo credit: Inside Creative House/Shutterstock

On Russia-Ukraine, the misdiagnosed patient is flatlining

Europe

With the imposition of new U.S. sanctions on Russian oil producers and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s dismissal of visiting Russian envoy Kirill Dmitriev as a “propagandist,” the Trump administration’s efforts to end the war in Ukraine seem to be hanging by a thread.

Their success or failure will depend on a simple premise: one must understand a problem in order to resolve it. Unfortunately, the West has been misdiagnosing the problem it faces in Ukraine for more than a decade, with increasingly tragic consequences. And the time in which President Trump can correct this diagnosis — and corresponding policy prescription — is quickly running out.

keep readingShow less
Why German rearmament isn't happening
Top image credit: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz arrives at the European Council meeting, where EU leaders gathered to discuss Ukraine, European defense, recent developments in the Middle East, competitiveness, housing and migration, in Brussels, on October 23, 2025.

Why German rearmament isn't happening

Europe

On October 13, Germany’s government had to cancel at the last minute a press conference at which it planned to announce a new bill expanding military conscription. It was the result of disagreements between the two major parties in the governing coalition, the Social Democrats (SPD) and Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU).

This episode reveals the fundamental fragility of Berlin’s much-touted defense renewal.

keep readingShow less
Patriot-missile
An MIM-104 Patriot missile is fired by members of Battery B, 8th Battalion, 43rd Air Defense Artillery. (US National Archives)

Inflating Russian missile costs hides our own weapons crisis

Europe

The West likes to inflate the cost of Russian weapons as a way to suggest Moscow is in a financial bind and manipulate the narrative of a looming Ukraine victory — while also masking real inefficiencies in the U.S. defense industry.

By assuming Russian weapons have input costs similar to U.S. systems or conflating export prices with Russia’s internal costs, Western estimates produce misleading figures. These inflated costs bolster the narrative that the strain on Moscow is tremendous, while downplaying the increasing challenges for Ukraine and NATO to effectively counter Russia’s relatively inexpensive missiles and drones.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.