Follow us on social

Gaza Khan Younis famine

Poll: 41% of Americans say Israel committing genocidal acts in Gaza

For the first time more respondents sympathize with Palestinians, while only 22% say Jerusalem's war is justified 'under the right to self-defense'

Reporting | Middle East

Forty-one percent of Americans, including 67% of Democrats and 14% of Republicans, believe that Israeli military actions in Gaza constitute either “genocide” (22%) or are "akin to genocide" (19%), according to a new poll released Monday by the University of Maryland Critical Issues series.

Confirming a growing trend, younger respondents of both parties were more likely to say that Israel’s actions constitute genocide or the like.

The poll, which surveyed more than 1,500 adults 18 and older between July 29 and August 7, found that only 22% of respondents said that Israel’s war in Gaza constituted “justified actions under the right to self-defense,” the public explanation by the Israeli government headed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Those included a mere 7% of Democrats and 46% of Republicans. A total of 23% of all respondents said they didn’t know.

Moreover, more than six in ten (61%) of respondents said that U.S. military, economic, and diplomatic support for Israel has enabled that country’s military actions, compared to 12% who said such assistance either has no impact (12%) or only marginal impact (10%) with the remaining 26% saying they didn’t know.

The view that Washington’s support has enabled Israeli actions in Gaza was transpartisan. Nearly three out of four Democrats (72%) agreed with that proposition, as did 57% of Republicans, and 63% of self-identified independents.

The survey was released amid growing international criticism of the Israel’s war, which is likely to intensify in the wake of Monday’s strike by Israel on a hospital in southern Gaza that reportedly killed 20 people, including five journalists bringing the total number of Palestinian journalists killed over the last 22 months to 189, according to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists.

The poll, the latest in a series dating back more than a decade by the University of Maryland, found that more Americans express sympathy for the Palestinians (28%) than with Israelis (22%), while 26% of respondents said they sympathize with both equally, and the remaining 25% aid they either sympathized with neither party (12%) or they didn’t know (13%).

Support for Palestinians was higher among respondents between 18 and 34 years old; 37% of that demographic said they sympathize more with the Palestinians compared to 11% who said they sympathize more with Israel. The gap between older and younger Republicans was particularly deep, according to Shibley Telhami, the Anwar Sadat Chair for Peace and Development at the University of Maryland, who has overseen the Critical Issues program.

“The change taking place among young Republicans is breathtaking,” he told RS via email. “While 52% of older republicans (35+) sympathize more with Israel, only 24% of younger Republicans (18-34) say the same — fewer than half.”

He also stressed that, while recent polls, including by Gallup and the Pew Research Center, have shown increasing sympathy for Palestinians, “this is the first time it is found that more Americans overall sympathize more with Palestinians than Israelis.”

Four out of ten respondents, including 63% of Democrats and 45% of independents, said the Trump administration’s policy toward Israel-Palestine is “too pro-Israel,” compared to only 3% who said it’s “too pro-Palestinian.” Another 27% said it was “about right,” and 30% said they “don’t know.” While a majority (57%) of Republicans said it was “about right,” more than one if five Republicans (21%) said it was “too pro-Israel.”

On the genocide/self-defense question, the survey found a large gap between younger and older Republicans, with 52% of the latter saying Israeli actions were justified, but only 22% of self-identified Republicans under 35 agreed with that assessment.

Significantly more respondents said that Israeli actions constituted genocide or were “akin to genocide” than a year ago when the University of Maryland series first posed the question. The percentage who agreed with the genocide proposition grew from 23 percent to 41 percent. The movement among Democrats was particularly significant — from 38% who agreed with the proposition one year ago to 67% in the latest poll.

Asked to assess whether current U.S. policy in the region “advances American interests,” only one third of all respondents responded positively, while 25% said “it mostly advances Israeli interests” and 6% said “it mostly advances interests of Arab states.”

Remarkably, more younger Republicans (26%) said U.S. policy mostly advances Israeli interests than said it mostly advances U.S. interests (24%).


Top photo credit: Internally displaced elderly Palestinian man Salim Asfour, enters his family's tent in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, 04 August 2025. Photo by Moaz Abu Taha apaima / IMAGO Images.
Reporting | Middle East
Israel
Top image credit: Skorzewiak via shutterstock.com

Who are the 'influencers' Israel is paying $7k per post?

Washington Politics

On Tuesday, RS published a story about how Israel is paying a cohort of 14-18 social media influencers around $7,000 per post to promote the country’s image in the American public. The campaign, nicknamed “Esther Project,” is coordinated by a newly created firm working out of a Capitol Hill rowhouse called Bridges Partners, and is slated to run through November.

However, as of publication, it is unclear who the influencers themselves are. According to the contract, they were supposed to begin posting on behalf of Israel in July, yet have not registered as foreign agents. By not registering as foreign agents and disclosing their names, the influencers are likely in violation of the U.S.’s premier foreign lobbying law, the Foreign Agents Registration Act. FARA experts say they must also mark their content on social media so that viewers know it is content sponsored by Israel.

keep readingShow less
Abdel Fattah El Sisi, President of Egypt
Top photo credit: Abdel Fattah El Sisi, President of Egypt, in Cairo, Egypt September 29, 2025. Abdulla Al Bedwawi/UAE Presidential Court/Handout via REUTERS

Egypt stepping out from Israel's shadow? It depends.

Middle East

Various forces, from tariffs to wars to the emerging multipolar world order, are potentially reshaping the Middle East and its alliances, and Egypt is playing a leading role. However, Egypt’s vision is bumping up against the reality that its dependence on Washington limits those shifting alliances and Egypt’s ability to play a leading role in them.

Time will tell how far Egypt can go.

keep readingShow less
Trump Putin
Top image credit: President Donald Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin participate in a joint press conference in Anchorage, Alaska, Friday, August 15, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Could bioweapons be center of gravity for US-Russia talks?

Latest

The deep freeze in U.S.-Russia relations shows occasional, promising cracks. It happened recently not on the primary issue of conflict — the war on Ukraine — but on a matter of mutual survival. During the United Nations General Assembly President Donald Trump announced an initiative to address one of arms control's most intractable problems: verifying compliance with the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).

"To prevent potential disasters, I'm announcing today that my administration will lead an international effort to enforce the biological weapons convention by pioneering an AI verification system that everyone can trust,” Trump said. He framed this as an urgent priority, claiming "many countries are continuing extremely risky research into bioweapons and man-made pathogens."

The proposal found immediate endorsement in Moscow. Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov offered unusually direct support, calling the initiative "brilliant in itself" and declaring that "Moscow supports it." Crucially, Peskov proposed concrete next steps, suggesting the U.S. proposal should be negotiated and formally codified in international agreements.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.