Follow us on social

Abdourahmane Tchiani, niger

Niger's accusation of Western chicanery hits close to home

The latest spat between Niamey's junta leader and Nigeria reflects growing bad blood and the loss of US and French influence in the region.

Analysis | Africa

As the year 2024 wound to a close, Niger’s junta leader, Brigade General Abdourahmane Tchiani, made accusations that France is using neighboring Nigeria as a staging ground to destabilize his country.

According to Tchiani, who came to power after overthrowing President Mohamed Bazoum in a military coup in July 2023, France offered money to Nigerian authorities “to establish a base in Borno State, with the sole aim of destabilizing our countries” — an apparent reference to other junta-led West African States, Mali and Burkina Faso, which recently split from ECOWAS.

The Nigerian government has refuted the allegation, describing it as false and baseless. It is not the first time Niger’s junta has made such accusations without offering concrete evidence. Nevertheless whether Tchiani was serious or merely uttering "hot air" to distract attention, the accusation exposes the tensions between the two countries at a time when they should be working together. Worse, it shows how suspicious the region is of Western powers and their interactions with ECOWAS and especially Nigeria.

Both Nigeria and Niger are close neighbors within the Lake Chad basin with historic and familial ties. Their mutual borders require joint patrol to ward off jihadist insurgency and banditry ravaging the local communities. It is for this reason that the spat has set off concerns in border communities prompting the Nigerian army to issue assurances earlier this month that the joint patrols would continue regardless of the row.

Together with Boko Haram, ISWAP (Islamic State–West Africa Province), and other widely-known jihadist groups, new security threats like Lakurawa have emerged in the last few years demonstrating the importance of regional cooperation. At the center of the row is an attack on the Niger-Benin crude oil pipeline in Gaya, Niger’s Dosso region on December 13 last year. The pipeline, a major economic asset for Niger which has large crude deposits, had been targeted in the past by anti-junta rebel groups.

Tension had been brewing between Nigeria and Niger since July 26, 2023 when Bazoum, the democratically-elected president of Niger, was overthrown in a coup by his presidential guards headed by Tchiani. Bazoum and his wife Hadiza remain in detention since then, despite global calls for their release.

While in power, Bazoum had been a loyal ally of Niger’s former colonial power, France, so his removal represented a blow to French interests in the country. Since he took power, General Tchiani has broken ties with France, prompting the former colonial power to withdraw its 1,500 troops from the country in December 2023.

The junta has subsequently sought military support from Moscow in its fight against decades-long jihadist insurgency, following on the heels of Mali and Burkina Faso juntas. In April last year, the first set of about 100 Russian advisers arrived in Niamey along with air defense systems.

Niamey’s grouse with Nigeria’s government stems primarily from the role its resident, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has played since the July 26 coup in his capacity as the chairman of the regional bloc, ECOWAS. Eager to earn his stripes as a strong leader amid a regional crisis, Tinubu had been instrumental in securing a strong ECOWAS reprimand of the coup.

Under Tinubu’s leadership, the bloc also imposed a no fly zone and closed borders amid other crippling economic sanctions slapped on Niger after initially threatening to invade the country unless the junta reinstated Bazoum.

Intended to halt the string of coups plaguing the region in recent times, ECOWAS’s tough line achieved the opposite — hardening the juntas who saw the regional body as an attack dog of French and American imperialism punishing their citizens for defending their sovereignty.

In July 2023, Niger, alongside Mali and Burkina Faso, split from ECOWAS to form a mutual defense pact called the Alliance of Sahel States.

Part of a general trend, the coup in Niger occurred in the context of the growing unpopularity of France among its former colonies who accuse the Elysee Palace of meddling in their internal affairs despite granting them formal independence since 1960. For example, several countries have followed on the heels of the Alliance of Sahel States in expelling French troops, the latest being Ivory Coast and Senegal.

Right now, France has lost over 80 percent of its military presence in the region with only a few troops left in Gabon and Djibouti.

Alongside his tough stance against the coup, the Nigerian president’s recent cozy relationship with France makes him an easy target in the highly polarized environment that has developed within the region since the July 26 coup. Last November, Tinubu, embarked on a widely-publicized state visit to the Palais de l'Élysée, the first of any Nigerian leader in three decades.

Apparently signaling a shift in France Africa strategy towards strengthening relations with Anglophone countries, the visit has added to the growing suspicion among AES member states of a Western plot to destabilize them using Nigeria as a launch pad.

It is instructive that the diplomatic row was taking place ahead of Donald Trump’s inauguration. Niger is a uranium-rich country in West Africa — holding at least 5 percent of global uranium mining output. The country, one of the region’s poorest in GDP terms, is also a crucial transit hub for Europe-bound migrants. Furthermore, Niger was an important base for U.S. counterterrorism operations because of its vantage location. This ended by April last year when U..S troops were evicted by the junta from two military bases, Air Base 101 in Niamey and Air Base 201 in Agadez, where they had been running drone operations for counterterrorism surveillance since 2019.

It is not clear whether the new Trump administration will be able to negotiate with any African state within the region to host a U.S. military base considering the prevailing sentiment. The loss of this vital facility means that for the next foreseeable period, the U.S. may have to rely on its bases in Italy and Djibouti for counter surveillance operations — an unfortunate downgrade in strategic advantage in the region.


Top photo credit: General Abdourahmane Tchiani, who was declared as the new head of state of Niger by leaders of a coup, arrives to meet with ministers in Niamey, Niger July 28, 2023. REUTERS/Balima Boureima/
Analysis | Africa
Iran
Top image credit: An Iranian man (not pictured) carries a portrait of the former commander of the IRGC Aerospace Forces, Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, and participates in a funeral for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commanders, Iranian nuclear scientists, and civilians who are killed in Israeli attacks, in Tehran, Iran, on June 28, 2025, during the Iran-Israel ceasefire. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto VIA REUTERS)

First it was regime change, now they want to break Iran apart

Middle East

Washington’s foreign policy establishment has a dangerous tendency to dismantle nations it deems adversarial. Now, neoconservative think tanks like the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) and their fellow travelers in the European Parliament are openly promoting the balkanization of Iran — a reckless strategy that would further destabilize the Middle East, trigger catastrophic humanitarian crises, and provoke fierce resistance from both Iranians and U.S. partners.

As Israel and Iran exchanged blows in mid-June, FDD’s Brenda Shaffer argued that Iran’s multi-ethnic makeup was a vulnerability to be exploited. Shaffer has been a vocal advocate for Azerbaijan in mainstream U.S. media, even as she has consistently failed to disclose her ties to Azerbaijan’s state oil company, SOCAR. For years, she has pushed for Iran’s fragmentation along ethnic lines, akin to the former Yugoslavia’s collapse. She has focused much of that effort on promoting the secession of Iranian Azerbaijan, where Azeris form Iran’s largest non-Persian group.

keep readingShow less
Ratcliffe Gabbard
Top image credit: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA director John Ratcliffe join a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump and his intelligence team in the Situation Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S. June 21, 2025. The White House/Handout via REUTERS

Trump's use and misuse of Iran intel

Middle East

President Donald Trump has twice, within the space of a week, been at odds with U.S. intelligence agencies on issues involving Iran’s nuclear program. In each instance, Trump was pushing his preferred narrative, but the substantive differences in the two cases were in opposite directions.

Before the United States joined Israel’s attack on Iran, Trump dismissed earlier testimony by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, in which she presented the intelligence community’s judgment that “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.” Questioned about this testimony, Trump said, “she’s wrong.”

keep readingShow less
Mohammad Bin Salman Trump Ayatollah Khomenei
Top photo credit: Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman (President of the Russian Federation/Wikimedia Commons); U.S. President Donald Trump (Gage Skidmore/Flickr) and Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei (Wikimedia Commons)

Let's make a deal: Enrichment path that both Iran, US can agree on

Middle East

The recent conflict, a direct confrontation that pitted Iran against Israel and drew in U.S. B-2 bombers, has likely rendered the previous diplomatic playbook for Tehran's nuclear program obsolete.

The zero-sum debates concerning uranium enrichment that once defined that framework now represent an increasingly unworkable approach.

Although a regional nuclear consortium had been previously advanced as a theoretical alternative, the collapse of talks as a result of military action against Iran now positions it as the most compelling path forward for all parties.

Before the war, Iran was already suggesting a joint uranium enrichment facility with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) on Iranian soil. For Iran, this framework could achieve its primary goal: the preservation of a domestic nuclear program and, crucially, its demand to maintain some enrichment on its own territory. The added benefit is that it embeds Iran within a regional security architecture that provides a buffer against unilateral attack.

For Gulf actors, it offers unprecedented transparency and a degree of control over their rival-turned-friend’s nuclear activities, a far better outcome than a possible covert Iranian breakout. For a Trump administration focused on deals, it offers a tangible, multilateral framework that can be sold as a blueprint for regional stability.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.