Follow us on social

google cta
US Army in Europe

Congress wants to stop Trump troop withdrawal from Europe

This year’s NDAA would place restrictions on the number of soldiers the Pentagon can bring home

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The final version of this year’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which sets Defense Department policy priorities for the next year, would place obstacles to any effort to reduce the U.S. troop presence in Europe.

Released Sunday, the package, a compromise between the previous House and Senate NDAA versions, would prevent the Pentagon from having fewer than 76,000 troops in Europe for longer than 45 days. After that period of time the secretary of defense and U.S. European Command leadership would have to show Congress that they have consulted NATO allies and their decision aligns with U.S. national security interests.

The measure stands in contrast with the Trump administration’s recently released National Security Strategy, which instead encourages Europeans to take responsibility for their defense needs, and follows lawmaker concerns that the Trump administration’s push to remove U.S. troops from Romania, could invite attack from Russia.

Mark Episkopos, research fellow in the Quincy Institute's Eurasia Program, told RS the measure obstructs ongoing U.S. efforts to change its relationship with Europe.

“The very appearance of a lack of disunity in Washington over the necessity of Europe taking charge of its own defense is a moral hazard insofar as it incentivizes Europe to play for time rather than working with the administration to come up with a strategy for real burden sharing,” he said. “The White House should make clear to Europe that retrenchment is a fixed strategic direction that will be reflected on all levels of U.S. policy going forward."

The NDAA also authorizes $8 billion more in defense spending than what the Pentagon requested for FY 2026. That boosted topline number is a compromise between the House and Senate versions of the NDAA, where the House version kept to the Pentagon’s budget request, and the Senate version requested $32 billion more.

The NDAA also would repeal the 2002 and 1991 Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs) in Iraq, moves that those pushing for greater congressional control of U.S. foreign policy decisions have long-advocated for. President Trump cited the 2002 AUMF as the legal basis for the strike that killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in 2020.

But the 2001 AUMF, most frequently cited as the legal basis for U.S. counterterrorism operations abroad over the previous two decades, is not on the chopping block.

The NDAA also extends the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, which provides military assistance to Ukraine, with $400 million for both FY26 and FY27.

The final NDAA vote could take place as soon as this week. The House Rules Committee is slated to discuss the legislation Tuesday afternoon.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Top photo credit: US Army in Europe (US Army/Rawpixel)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Does Israel really still need a 'qualitative military edge' ?
An Israeli Air Force F-35I Lightning II “Adir” approaches a U.S. Air Force 908th Expeditionary Refueling Squadron KC-10 Extender to refuel during “Enduring Lightning II” exercise over southern Israel Aug. 2, 2020. While forging a resolute partnership, the allies train to maintain a ready posture to deter against regional aggressors. (U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Patrick OReilly)

Does Israel really still need a 'qualitative military edge' ?

Middle East

On November 17, 2025, President Donald Trump announced that he would approve the sale to Saudi Arabia of the most advanced US manned strike fighter aircraft, the F-35. The news came one day before the visit to the White House of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who has sought to purchase 48 such aircraft in a multibillion-dollar deal that has the potential to shift the military status quo in the Middle East. Currently, Israel is the only other state in the region to possess the F-35.

During the White House meeting, Trump suggested that Saudi Arabia’s F-35s should be equipped with the same technology as those procured by Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly sought assurances from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who sought to walk back Trump’s comment and reiterated a “commitment that the United States will continue to preserve Israel’s qualitative military edge in everything related to supplying weapons and military systems to countries in the Middle East.”

keep readingShow less
Think a $35B gas deal will thaw Egypt toward Israel? Not so fast.
Top image credit: Miss.Cabul via shutterstock.com

Think a $35B gas deal will thaw Egypt toward Israel? Not so fast.

Middle East

The Trump administration’s hopes of convening a summit between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi either in Cairo or Washington as early as the end of this month or early next are unlikely to materialize.

The centerpiece of the proposed summit is the lucrative expansion of natural gas exports worth an estimated $35 billion. This mega-deal will pump an additional 4 billion cubic meters annually into Egypt through 2040.

keep readingShow less
Trump
Top image credit: President Donald Trump addresses the nation, Wednesday, December 17, 2025, from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump national security logic: rare earths and fossil fuels

Washington Politics

The new National Security Strategy of the United States seeks “strategic stability” with Russia. It declares that China is merely a competitor, that the Middle East is not central to American security, that Latin America is “our hemisphere,” and that Europe faces “civilizational erasure.”

India, the world's largest country by population, barely rates a mention — one might say, as Neville Chamberlain did of Czechoslovakia in 1938, it’s “a faraway country... of which we know nothing.” Well, so much the better for India, which can take care of itself.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.