Follow us on social

google cta
US Army in Europe

Congress wants to stop Trump troop withdrawal from Europe

This year’s NDAA would place restrictions on the number of soldiers the Pentagon can bring home

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The final version of this year’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which sets Defense Department policy priorities for the next year, would place obstacles to any effort to reduce the U.S. troop presence in Europe.

Released Sunday, the package, a compromise between the previous House and Senate NDAA versions, would prevent the Pentagon from having fewer than 76,000 troops in Europe for longer than 45 days. After that period of time the secretary of defense and U.S. European Command leadership would have to show Congress that they have consulted NATO allies and their decision aligns with U.S. national security interests.

The measure stands in contrast with the Trump administration’s recently released National Security Strategy, which instead encourages Europeans to take responsibility for their defense needs, and follows lawmaker concerns that the Trump administration’s push to remove U.S. troops from Romania, could invite attack from Russia.

Mark Episkopos, research fellow in the Quincy Institute's Eurasia Program, told RS the measure obstructs ongoing U.S. efforts to change its relationship with Europe.

“The very appearance of a lack of disunity in Washington over the necessity of Europe taking charge of its own defense is a moral hazard insofar as it incentivizes Europe to play for time rather than working with the administration to come up with a strategy for real burden sharing,” he said. “The White House should make clear to Europe that retrenchment is a fixed strategic direction that will be reflected on all levels of U.S. policy going forward."

The NDAA also authorizes $8 billion more in defense spending than what the Pentagon requested for FY 2026. That boosted topline number is a compromise between the House and Senate versions of the NDAA, where the House version kept to the Pentagon’s budget request, and the Senate version requested $32 billion more.

The NDAA also would repeal the 2002 and 1991 Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs) in Iraq, moves that those pushing for greater congressional control of U.S. foreign policy decisions have long-advocated for. President Trump cited the 2002 AUMF as the legal basis for the strike that killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in 2020.

But the 2001 AUMF, most frequently cited as the legal basis for U.S. counterterrorism operations abroad over the previous two decades, is not on the chopping block.

The NDAA also extends the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, which provides military assistance to Ukraine, with $400 million for both FY26 and FY27.

The final NDAA vote could take place as soon as this week. The House Rules Committee is slated to discuss the legislation Tuesday afternoon.


Top photo credit: US Army in Europe (US Army/Rawpixel)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
POGO The Bunker
Top image credit: Project on Government Oversight

Air wars, drones, and US bases left strangely unprotected

Military Industrial Complex

The Bunker appears originally at the Project on Government Oversight and is republished here with permission.

keep readingShow less
A deal that Cuba (and Trump) cannot refuse?
Top photo credit: Cuba's Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Carlos Fernandez de Cossio speaks during an interview with Reuters in Havana, Cuba, February 2, 2026. REUTERS/Norlys Perez

A deal that Cuba (and Trump) cannot refuse?

Latin America

Last week, President Trump declared a national emergency regarding Cuba and threatened to impose 30% tariffs on countries supplying Havana with oil. The move made clear that Washington is exerting maximum leverage over the island in bilateral talks the president says are taking place but Cuban authorities deny.

As Cuba's economy descends into free fall and its population leaves the island at unprecedented levels, Trump says he'll be "kind" and wants to avoid a "humanitarian crisis" in the deal he intends to strike with Cuban leaders. At the same time, he reiterated his hopes that talks will lead to a "free Cuba" and the return of Cuban Americans who left after the 1959 Cuban Revolution and resettled in South Florida.

keep readingShow less
Why Russia survived — and may thrive — after Syria regime change
Top image credit: Russia's President Vladimir Putin shakes hands with Syria's President Ahmed al-Sharaa during a meeting at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, on October 15, 2025. Alexander Zemlianichenko/Pool via REUTERS

Why Russia survived — and may thrive — after Syria regime change

Middle East

Late last month, Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa visited Moscow, for the second time since assuming office.

“I saw a lot of snow on the way and recalled a story,” he said to President Putin in the Kremlin. “I recalled how many military powers tried to reach Moscow, but failed due to the courage of Russian soldiers, and also because nature itself helped to protect this blessed land.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.