Follow us on social

google cta
US Army in Europe

Congress wants to stop Trump troop withdrawal from Europe

This year’s NDAA would place restrictions on the number of soldiers the Pentagon can bring home

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The final version of this year’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which sets Defense Department policy priorities for the next year, would place obstacles to any effort to reduce the U.S. troop presence in Europe.

Released Sunday, the package, a compromise between the previous House and Senate NDAA versions, would prevent the Pentagon from having fewer than 76,000 troops in Europe for longer than 45 days. After that period of time the secretary of defense and U.S. European Command leadership would have to show Congress that they have consulted NATO allies and their decision aligns with U.S. national security interests.

The measure stands in contrast with the Trump administration’s recently released National Security Strategy, which instead encourages Europeans to take responsibility for their defense needs, and follows lawmaker concerns that the Trump administration’s push to remove U.S. troops from Romania, could invite attack from Russia.

Mark Episkopos, research fellow in the Quincy Institute's Eurasia Program, told RS the measure obstructs ongoing U.S. efforts to change its relationship with Europe.

“The very appearance of a lack of disunity in Washington over the necessity of Europe taking charge of its own defense is a moral hazard insofar as it incentivizes Europe to play for time rather than working with the administration to come up with a strategy for real burden sharing,” he said. “The White House should make clear to Europe that retrenchment is a fixed strategic direction that will be reflected on all levels of U.S. policy going forward."

The NDAA also authorizes $8 billion more in defense spending than what the Pentagon requested for FY 2026. That boosted topline number is a compromise between the House and Senate versions of the NDAA, where the House version kept to the Pentagon’s budget request, and the Senate version requested $32 billion more.

The NDAA also would repeal the 2002 and 1991 Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs) in Iraq, moves that those pushing for greater congressional control of U.S. foreign policy decisions have long-advocated for. President Trump cited the 2002 AUMF as the legal basis for the strike that killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in 2020.

But the 2001 AUMF, most frequently cited as the legal basis for U.S. counterterrorism operations abroad over the previous two decades, is not on the chopping block.

The NDAA also extends the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, which provides military assistance to Ukraine, with $400 million for both FY26 and FY27.

The final NDAA vote could take place as soon as this week. The House Rules Committee is slated to discuss the legislation Tuesday afternoon.


Top photo credit: US Army in Europe (US Army/Rawpixel)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Royal Navy
Top image credit: The Royal Navy guided missile destroyer HMS Duncan arrives in the port of Hamburg and moors at the Überseebrücke. The HMS Duncan arrives from Portsmouth and will leave the Hanseatic city on Tuesday, November 25, at 10:00 a.m. Marcus Golejewski/dpa via Reuters Connect

If Europe starts attacking Russian cargo ships, all bets are off

Europe

Inspired by the U.S. seizure on the high seas of ships carrying Venezuelan oil, Britain and other NATO countries are now considering using their navies to do the same to ships carrying Russian cargoes.

This would be a radical escalation of existing moves against Russia’s so-called “shadow fleet,” which have been restricted to the ports and territorial waters of NATO states. As such, they can be considered to fall under the sovereign jurisdiction of the states concerned. An extension of this strategy, as presently contemplated by some European countries, would be a limited but reasonable and comparatively risk-free way of increasing economic pressure on Russia.

keep readingShow less
Friedrich Merz
Top image credit: EUS-Nachrichten via shutterstock.com

Germany's grandstanding on Iran: The best Europe can muster?

Europe

In a striking display of recklessness, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz declared the Islamic Republic of Iran to be in its “last days and weeks,” a regime he asserted had “no legitimacy.”

While other Western leaders condemned the bloody clampdown on the protests in Iran — with, according to conservative estimates, around 2,500 a in few days — none of them went so far as to boldly prognosticate an imminent demise of the regime in Tehran.

keep readingShow less
Trump and Lindsey Graham
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump, with Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), speaks to reporters aboard Air Force One en route from Florida to Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, U.S., January 4, 2026. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Does MAGA want Trump to ‘make regime change great again’?

Washington Politics

“We must abandon the failed policy of nation building and regime change that Hillary Clinton pushed in Iraq, Libya, Egypt and Syria,” then-candidate Donald Trump said in his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention in 2016.

This wasn’t the first time he eschewed the foreign policies of his predecessors: “We’re not looking for regime change,” he said of Iran and North Korea during a press conference in 2019. “We’ve learned that lesson a long time ago.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.