Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch Donald Trump Putin Zelensky

Diplomacy Watch: JD Vance says Russians are asking for too much

The vice president said there’s still ‘a big gulf’ between Moscow and Kyiv

Reporting | QiOSK

On Wednesday, Vice President JD Vance told Munich Leaders Meeting attendees that Russia was “asking for too much” in the peace negotiation process.

Vance also clarified Washington’s strategy, saying that the United States sought a long-term settlement as the Russians continually rejected Ukraine’s offer for a 30-day ceasefire.

“The Russians are asking for a certain set of requirements, a certain set of concessions in order to end the conflict. We think they’re asking for too much,” Vance said, adding that Moscow would have to make some concessions.

Vance insisted that both Russia and Ukraine had to agree to terms to sit down and talk with each other, that it was “probably impossible” for Americans to properly mediate without the two sides doing so.

“In particular, the step that we would like to make right now is we would like both the Russians and the Ukrainians to actually agree on some basic guidelines for sitting down and talking to one another,” Vance said. “Obviously, the United States is happy to participate in those conversations, but it’s very important for the Russians and the Ukrainians to start talking to one another. We think that is the next big step that we would like to take.”

He added that the United States could walk away if Trump didn’t see a path forward.

When asked about the vice president’s comments, President Trump responded, “It’s possible that’s right.” Adding, “we are getting to a point where some decisions are going to have to be made.”

This sentiment mirrors some of the frustration reported from the White House. Trump, in a late-April social media post aimed at Putin, said the Russian president might be “tapping me along,” and that “maybe he doesn’t want to stop the war.” In the same post, Trump threatened Putin with secondary sanctions if Moscow continued to attack civilian infrastructure.

Both sides have shown some interest in a peace settlement. In late April, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that the Kremlin is “ready to reach a deal” with the United States after some fine-tuning. Additionally, the Ukrainian parliament approved the long-awaited rare-earth mineral deal with Washington yesterday. While the agreement did not include any explicit security guarantees for Ukraine, it is seen as necessary to strengthen ties between Kyiv and Washington and to show that Ukraine is a “constructive party,” as Ukrainian politician Inna Sovsun said.

Other Ukraine War News This Week

Hours after it began, Ukraine is accusing Russia of breaking a 3-day truce. Al Jazeera reports that on Thursday, Ukraine’s Air Force claimed that Russia sent guided bombs into the Sumy region of Ukraine. The attack reportedly caused three residential buildings to catch fire and killed one civilian.

As Russia was preparing for its Victory Day parade, Ukraine struck deep into Russia, forcing all four airports in Moscow to close temporarily. According to The New York Times, the Russian Ministry of Defense shot down 105 drones across 11 regions in Russia, including areas just east of Moscow, hundreds of miles from Ukraine. The Ukrainian government reported no deaths or serious injuries.

The Financial Timesreported that Chinese leader Xi Jinping and Russian president Vladimir Putin met on Thursday to strengthen economic ties. In the Kremlin, the nations agreed to increase cooperation and friendship while signing an official statement implicitly critical of Washington. China is still officially neutral in the Russia-Ukraine war, but has agreed to increase trade with Russia as Moscow weathers American and European sanctions.

From the May 5 State Department press briefing:

Spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the United States would continue operating as a mediator between Russia and Ukraine for now and that “we’ve been its (Ukraine’s) largest supporter; we remain its largest supporter.” She qualified her statement: "we do recognize, and everyone has to, that both parties must come up with their proposals for an enduring peace, that we are looking for that progress.”

She confirmed that President Trump was optimistic about a good outcome for all parties.

Another reporter inquired about the announcement that Russia and China would strengthen ties and a supposed report that Chinese companies were making missiles in Russia. Bruce responded by simply saying that several countries were responsible “for helping move the carnage that is unfolding in Ukraine.”

Finally, the spokesperson declined to comment on whether the United States supported “the principle of territorial integrity and not changing borders by force” concerning Russian holdings in Ukraine.


Top Photo Credit: Diplomacy Watch (Khody Akhavi)
Diplomacy Watch: Minerals deal to occur next week
Reporting | QiOSK
iraqi protests iran israel
Top photo credit: Iraqi Shi'ite Muslims hold a cutout of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as they attend a protest against Israeli strikes on Iran, in Baghdad, Iraq, June 16, 2025. REUTERS/Ahmed Saad

Iraq on razor's edge between Iran and US interests in new war

Middle East

As Israeli jets and Iranian rockets streak across the Middle Eastern skies, Iraq finds itself caught squarely in the crossfire.

With regional titans clashing above its head, Iraq’s fragile and hard-won stability, painstakingly rebuilt over decades of conflict, now hangs precariously in the balance. Washington’s own tacit acknowledgement of Iraq’s vulnerable position was laid bare by its decision to partially evacuate embassy personnel in Iraq and allow military dependents to leave the region.

This withdrawal, prompted by intelligence indicating Israeli preparations for long-range strikes, highlighted that Iraq’s airspace would be an unwitting corridor for Israeli and Iranian operations.

Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ al-Sudani is now caught in a complicated bind, attempting to uphold Iraq’s security partnership with the United States while simultaneously facing intense domestic pressure from powerful, Iran-aligned Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) factions. These groups, emboldened by the Israel-Iran clash, have intensified their calls for American troop withdrawal and threaten renewed attacks against U.S. personnel, viewing them as legitimate targets and enablers of Israeli aggression.

keep readingShow less
George Bush mission accomplished
This file photo shows Bush delivering a speech to crew aboard the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, as the carrier steamed toward San Diego, California on May 1, 2003. via REUTERS

Déjà coup: Iran war activates regime change dead-enders

Washington Politics

By now you’ve likely seen the viral video of an Iranian television reporter fleeing off-screen as Israel bombed the TV station where she was recording live. As the Quincy Institute’s Adam Weinstein quickly pointed out, Israel's attack on the broadcasting facility is directly out of the regime change playbook, “meant to shake public confidence in the Iranian government's ability to protect itself” and by implication, Iran’s citizenry.

Indeed, in the United States there is a steady drumbeat of media figures and legislators who have been loudly championing Israel’s apparent desire to overthrow the regime of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

keep readingShow less
Ukraine NATO
Top photo credit: August 2024 -- Led by the United Kingdom and involving trainers from 12 other countries, Operation Interflex gives Ukrainian recruits a five-week crash course in everything from infantry tactics to combat first aid, preparing them to defend their homeland. . (NATO/Flickr)

How NATO military doctrine failed Ukraine on the battlefield

Europe

The war in Ukraine has raged for over three years. As ceasefire talks loom, major European NATO members including Germany, UK, France and Denmark are planning to protect any future armistice by sending their troops as peacekeepers in a “Coalition of the Willing.”

Their goal is to deter the Russians from restarting the war. Unfortunately, deterrence comes from combat capability. Without it there is no deterrence at all. That capability is in question. NATO equipment and doctrine was developed for the Cold War and tested in the mountains of Afghanistan. It has not been tested in conventional war and needs to absorb lessons from the Ukraine war to offer a military option to the European elites, independent of the United States.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.