Follow us on social

China hawks dominate pool for Japan’s next prime minister

China hawks dominate pool for Japan’s next prime minister

Only one candidate favors engaging Beijing, and he has the fewest US ties


Analysis | Asia-Pacific

By the end of this month, Japan will have a new prime minister, and whoever it is will come from the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).

The likely candidates to lead the conservative LDP, which has ruled Japan since 1955 with only two short breaks, differ by gender, age, and faction. But they all share one important trait: Each is firmly committed to the U.S.-Japan military alliance and a joint policy of aggressively containing China. This is remarkable for a country once known for its culture of anti-militarism.

Eager to rescue his troubled party from defeat in the next general election, Prime Minister Kishida Fumio announced last month that he would step down as head of the LDP. Party officials will select a new president on September 27. The Kishida regime had been wracked by a couple scandals. The first came in 2021, after his predecessor, Prime Minister Abe Shinzo, was assassinated by a young man enraged by the political influence of the right-wing, Korea-based Unification Church. Press reports revealed that the church was helping to underwrite the LDP. The second and more recent scandal revolved around party factions that had collected millions of dollars in unreported campaign funds.

Japan has a parliamentary system, and the LDP now controls more than half of the seats in the House of Representatives, which chooses the prime minister. But the scandals have buffeted the ruling party, now supported by only 20 percent of the public, according to a recent NHK poll. To regain public trust, Kishida said the party needs a “fresh face.”

There are, indeed, two younger, if not entirely “fresh,” faces. One belongs to Koizumi Shinjiro, a 43 year old heartthrob who recently has dominated the Sunday talk shows. But Koizumi is well known as the son of a former prime minister who was, himself, a member of the former Abe and Suga cabinets. The other belongs to Kobayashi Takayuki, who is only 49 but already has served in the Abe and Kishida cabinets — first as parliamentary vice minister for defense and then as minister of economic security.

Among the declared and possible candidates are three women, either of whom would become (if successful) the first female prime minister of Japan. Kamikawa Yoko is the current foreign minister and previous justice minister; Takaichi Sanae is the minister of state for economic security; Noda Seiko was minister in charge of measures to combat the declining birthrate. All three women are quite conservative. Takaichi and Noda are members of Nippon Kaigi, an ultra-nationalist group with a revisionist view of history. Kamikawa once appeared to argue that women are worthless if they don’t produce children.

Traditionally, one could distinguish LDP pols by the money-raising factions to which they belong. But these groups have never been ideological, and they play a smaller role in Japanese politics today. Kono Taro is now the only candidate openly endorsed by a faction (the 54-member bloc led by former prime minister turned LDP vice president Aso Taro).

Two factions at the center of the recent “slush fund” scandal completely folded: the Abe bloc, which had been the largest, had included Ms. Takaichi; and the Nikai bloc, which had included Mr. Kobayashi. Prime Minister Kishida, trying to model good governance, dissolved his own faction, which had included Hayashi Yoshimasa, the current chief cabinet secretary, and Ms. Kamikawa, the current foreign minister.

But other factions supposedly died and were reborn as “policy groups.” This includes the bloc led by Ishiba Shigeru, the former defense minister who is running again (a fifth time) for party leader. Economy minister Saito Ken, who has hinted at running, is a member of that faction, or “policy group.” Likewise, Motegi Toshimitsu, secretary general of the LDP and a declared candidate, heads a renamed bloc. Former health minister Kato Katsunobu also belongs to the Motegi group and is running against his mentor for top dog in the LDP.

So it’s a free-for-all, wide-open mess. How are we to make sense of this important contest for Japanese leadership and its implications for relations with the United States?

Here’s my take: More than ever before, LDP politicians are slavishly pro-alliance and anti-China. That is, they identify with and wish to cultivate U.S. hegemony, even if it is waning.

Kono, for example, is profoundly hawkish about Beijing’s rise to power. He has even called for deploying nuclear submarines to counter Chinese maritime patrols in the East China Sea. Takaichi is another China hawk. She has promised to consolidate Japan’s hold over the Senkaku Islands, which Beijing also claims. In fact, Ishiba is probably the only candidate for LDP president who has openly called for deeper engagement rather than confrontation with China. He has said that the U.S.-Japan alliance can exist alongside a wider system of diplomacy among Asian powers.

All the candidates favor closer ties between the U.S. and Japanese militaries. This reflects, in part, a historical reality driven by increased cooperation between Kishida and U.S. President Joe Biden, who worked together to transform the 72-year old bilateral alliance from one that merely defends Japan against attack to one that projects joint power in the region, not just around the Japanese archipelago, but also in the East and South China seas.

But the pro-American lineup also reflects close personal relationships between Japanese politicians (and bureaucrats), on the one hand, and their U.S. counterparts, on the other. Put simply, this is a group of conservative MPs with strong links to the United States.

For example, several of the candidates for LDP leader studied in the U.S. Five — Kamikawa, Motegi, Kobayashi, Saito, and Hayashi — received graduate degrees from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. Kono did his undergraduate studies at Georgetown University before working on behalf of two different members of the U.S. Congress. Koizumi received a master’s degree from Columbia University and worked part-time for the U.S.-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. Takaichi spent two years working for a U.S. congresswoman. Noda attended high school in Michigan.

Interestingly, Ishiba, the former defense minister who is probably the least anti-China of all the LDP candidates, may also be the one with the fewest American connections. He is viewed as an iconoclast and outsider who is probably too “Asian-minded” to win the job. Japan, he told the Diplomat, “must think for itself how to deploy American forces in Japan, and not simply view it as a duty to allow the Americans to put bases anywhere in Japan that it likes.”

Thirty years ago, that kind of sentiment might have won favor with Japanese citizens worried about the possible consequences of the U.S.-Japan security alliance. Today it marks otherwise conservative Ishiba as an outlier, at least within the LDP.


Nine candidates for the Japan Liberal Democratic Party presidential election attend a panel discussion at the Japan National Press Club in Tokyo, Japan, on September 14, 2024.

Analysis | Asia-Pacific
ukraine war
Top Photo: Diplomacy Watch: Trump's 'gotta make a deal' on Ukraine
Diplomacy Watch: Trump's 'gotta make a deal' on Ukraine

Diplomacy Watch: Here comes Trump

Regions

Donald Trump’s nominee for U.S. secretary of state said this week that he wants the war between Ukraine and Russia to end.

“It is important for everyone to be realistic: there will have to be concessions made by the Russian Federation, but also by Ukrainians,” said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) during his Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday. “There is no way Russia takes all of Ukraine.”

keep readingShow less
Netanyahu , biden
Top photo credit: US President Joe Biden meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office at the White House on July 25, 2024 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Sipa USA)

Who should take credit for the ceasefire? Netanyahu.

QiOSK

It is an official: Israel and Hamas have agreed to a ceasefire.

It would appear to be based on the text already made available by the Associated Press, which is very much like the deal brokered by the Biden administration in May 2024. That agreement was never ratified by either side and was never implemented.

keep readingShow less
Joe Biden Gaza ceasefire
Top image credit: U.S. President Joe Biden, flanked by U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, speaks after negotiators reached a phased deal for a ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, during remarks at the White House in Washington, U.S., January 15, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

Biden & Trump take credit for Gaza ceasefire

Middle East

The achievement of a Gaza hostage deal and temporary ceasefire ahead of Trump's inauguration demonstrates the power that the U.S. had all along. The Biden administration simply refused to use American leverage to push Netanyahu, despite U.S. officials’ assertions that they were “working tirelessly towards a ceasefire.”

In his remarks about the deal, and in his response to journalists afterwards, President Biden sought to take full credit. He pointed out that this was the deal he proposed in May, yet did not acknowledge that it was Trump’s willingness to pressure Israel to reach a ceasefire in time for his inauguration that actually achieved the deal, which Biden had failed to for months. "A diplomat briefed on the ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas credited progress in the talks in part to the influence of President-elect Donald Trump, saying it was 'the first time there has been real pressure on the Israeli side to accept a deal’,” according to the Washington Post.

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.