Follow us on social

Iran's retaliatory attacks today limited, but not insignificant

Iran's retaliatory attacks today limited, but not insignificant

'Tehran may also seek to show Trump that they are willing to strike back harder and further than he might have anticipated'

QiOSK

Iran launched missiles at U.S. bases in Qatar today in what is being called "calculated retaliation" for Saturday's U.S. airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear sites.

Iranian officials had reportedly sent advanced warning of the attack on Al Udeid Air Base, which had already been evacuated. President Donald Trump said the missiles were intercepted and no casualties reported.

Trita Parsi, co-founder and Executive Vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, wrote on X that the attacks may have been limited — for now. But they should not be read as merely symbolic or face-saving.

"Of course (they) have significant implications for Iran's relations with these [Gulf Cooperation Council] states — but also [GCC] relations with the US, mindful of their opposition to Trump's strikes and anger at him for disregarding their security and interests," he wrote. "And Tehran may also seek to show Trump that they are willing to strike back harder and further than he might have anticipated."

He said there is a chance they would be limited in the ways that both sides telegraphed their retaliations in 2020 so as to avoid escalation.

"There is a scenario, similar to the 2020 strikes against Iraqi bases, in which both sides call it quits after one round of fire," said Parsi. "But I find that scenario unstable because of the Israeli element. Israel will continue to strike Iran and vice versa, and as long as that is the case, the Israelis will continue to put relentless pressure on Trump to join the war in various ways."

Annelle Sheline, Middle East research fellow at the Quincy Institute, noted that Trump had "needlessly put U.S. troops in the Middle East in Iran’s crosshairs" with Saturday's attacks.

“As commander in chief, the safety of Americans should be his highest priority, yet by attacking Iran when it posed no threat, Trump demonstrated his complete disregard for U.S. troops stationed in the region, as well as those who will lose their lives if the war escalates.”

Neighboring Gulf states Bahrain and Kuwait, which also host U.S. military bases, closed their air spaces after the attack; they have since re-opened them.

Article is being updated as story is develops


Top photo credit: FOX News Channel/Screengrab
QiOSK
Lockheed Martin NASA
Top photo credit: Lockheed Martin Space Systems in Littleton, Colo. Photo Credit: (NASA/Joel Kowsky)

The Pentagon spent $4 trillion over 5 years. Contractors got 54% of it.

Military Industrial Complex

Advocates of ever-higher Pentagon spending frequently argue that we must throw more money at the department to “support the troops.” But recent budget proposals and a new research paper issued by the Quincy Institute and the Costs of War Project at Brown University suggest otherwise.

The paper, which I co-authored with Stephen Semler, found that 54% of the Pentagon’s $4.4 trillion in discretionary spending from 2020 to 2024 went to military contractors. The top five alone — Lockheed Martin ($313 billion), RTX (formerly Raytheon, $145 billion), Boeing ($115 billion), General Dynamics ($116 billion), and Northrop Grumman ($81 billion) – received $771 billion in Pentagon contracts over that five year period.

keep readingShow less
China Malaysia
Top photo credit: Pearly Tan and Thinaah Muralitharan of Malaysia compete in the Women's Doubles Round Robin match against Nami Matsuyama and Chiharu Shida of Japan on day five of the BWF Sudirman Cup Finals 2025 at Fenghuang Gymnasium on May 1, 2025 in Xiamen, Fujian Province of China. (Photo by Zheng Hongliang/VCG )

How China is 'eating our lunch' with soft power

Asia-Pacific

In June 2025, while U.S. and Philippine forces conducted joint military drills in the Sulu Sea and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reaffirmed America’s commitment to the Indo-Pacific at Singapore’s Shangri-La Dialogue, another story deserving of attention played out less visibly.

A Chinese-financed rail project broke ground in Malaysia with diplomatic fanfare and local celebration. As Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim noted, the ceremony “marks an important milestone” in bilateral cooperation. The contrast was sharp: Washington sent ships and speeches; Beijing sent people and money.

keep readingShow less
President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev and President of Russia Vladimir Putin
Top photo credit: President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev and President of Russia Vladimir Putin appear on screen. (shutterstock/miss.cabul)

Westerners foolishly rush to defend Azerbaijan against Russia

Europe

The escalating tensions between Russia and Azerbaijan — marked by tit-for-tat arrests, accusations of ethnic violence, and economic sparring — have tempted some Western observers to view the conflict as an opportunity to further isolate Moscow.

However, this is not a simple narrative of Azerbaijan resisting Russian dominance. It is a complex struggle over energy routes, regional influence, and the future of the South Caucasus, where Western alignment with Baku risks undermining critical priorities, including potential U.S.-Russia engagement on Ukraine and arms control.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.