Follow us on social

google cta
Willliam Luers Angelina Jolie

At 95, William Luers never stopped believing in a US-Iran détente

The career diplomat died Saturday, but he left a legacy, and a playbook for peace

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Ambassador William H. Luers, whose active promotion of American diplomacy as a primary component of U.S. foreign policy continued well into his 90s, died Saturday at his home in Connecticut at the age of 95.

After a 31-year career in the foreign service, the Quincy Institute was proud to count him as a distinguished non-resident fellow.

His post-retirement career was certainly active: Luers served as president of the Metropolitan Museum of Art and as both chairman and president of the United Nations Association of the U.S.A. He was a key leader of The Iran Project, a group of scholars and retired diplomats and military committed to preventing Iran’s acquisition of a nuclear weapon and averting a military conflict in the region.

"Bill was an absolute giant. His work to strengthen diplomacy's role in U.S. foreign policy cannot be overstated,” said Quincy Institute Executive Vice President Trita Parsi. “Without him, there would never have been a nuclear deal with Iran, for instance."

The Iran Project to this day serves as a valuable hub for policymakers and analysts seeking to avoid misunderstandings between Iran and the U.S. in the process of finding diplomatic solutions to prevent an Iranian nuclear weapon.

President Barack Obama personally credited Luers’ work at The Iran Project for bringing about the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and the P5+1.

“Thanks to you at The Iran Project for your leadership on the nuclear deal,” wrote Obama in a handwritten note published in Luers’ memoir, Uncommon Company: Dissidents and Diplomats, Enemies and Artists. “It made a huge difference, and the world will be better for it.”

Luers enthusiastically sought to democratize foreign policy, touting the importance of art and culture — particularly music — to bridge cultures and overcome political barriers in the service of diplomacy.

Luers served as U.S. Ambassador to Czechoslovakia from 1983 to 1986, playing a pivotal role in building up the international celebrity of Vaclav Havel to protect him from assassination, a subtle act of diplomacy helping lay the groundwork for the country’s Velvet Revolution and Czechoslovakia’s transition from a one-party state and command economy to a parliamentary republic with Havel as the first president of the newly formed Czech Republic.

“Diplomacy and the arts. So completely do I believe in their collaborative power that I have spent fifty years advocating for them, fighting for them, and celebrating all that has been accomplished in their names,” wrote Luers in his 2024 memoir.

His book ended not on the note of a retired diplomat well into his 90s looking back at a life well-lived, but as a youthful problem-solver, drawn to the world’s toughest problems and asking how American diplomacy could be harnessed to end violent conflict and further the common-good. He wrote:

“With an unflinching belief in the fundamental principle of talking to the other in uncommon company, I am persuaded that we must talk even with Putin or his closest advisors to see when and whether he would be prepared to share his own thoughts on how to organize an end to the war with Ukraine. Some way must be found to seek back-channel communications with the Kremlin, with friends and associates of Putin, to determine whether there is an inclination to address our differences and explore ways to end this conflict with Ukraine. The demonization of Putin is fully understandable given the inhumanity of this war between Russia and Ukraine, but the need to converse with uncommon company, including your enemies, should override the hatred and hostility of the enemy. If the US is engaged in supporting a military conflict or conducting a military conflict, it must set objectives short of total victory. Incidentally, wins that are achievable allow the US to sustain conflicts without having to face up to humiliating defeat or endless wars.”

He is survived by his wife Wendy Woods Luers, three children, two stepchildren, five grandchildren and five step-grandchildren.


Top photo credit: Angelina Jolie poses for pictures with UNA-USA president William Luers during the United Nations Association of the USA awards dinner in New York on October 11, 2005. Jolie was honored with the 2005 UN Global Humanitarian Action Award for her work as a Goodwill Ambassador with refugees around the world. REUTERS/Seth Wenig
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports
Top image credit: A large oil tanker transits the Strait of Hormuz. (Shutterstock/ Clare Louise Jackson)

Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports

QiOSK

Hours after the U.S. and Israel launched a campaign of airstrikes across Iran, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is warning vessels in the Persian Gulf via radio that “no ship is allowed to pass the Strait of Hormuz,” according to a report from Reuters.

The news suggests that Iran is ready to pull out all the stops in its response to the U.S.-Israeli barrage, which President Donald Trump says is aimed at toppling the Iranian regime. A full shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz would cause an international crisis given that 20% of the world’s oil passes through the narrow channel. Financial analysts estimate that even one day of a full blockade could cause global oil prices to double from $66 per barrel to more than $120.

keep readingShow less
trump strikes iran
Top photo credit: Truth Social

Trump: we've begun combat strikes, regime change operations in Iran

Middle East

President Donald Trump released a video on Truth Social at 2:30 a.m. ET this morning announcing that major U.S. combat operations in Iran were underway. At the end he demanded disarmament by Tehran: "lay down your arms and you will be treated fairly with total immunity or you will face certain death." He also said to "the people of Iran" that "when we are finished the government is yours to take. Your hour of freedom is at hand."

This operation would clearly go beyond the 2025 "Operation Midnight Hammer" in which Trump claimed this morning that the U.S. had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear program. This time he said the U.S. would to "raze their missile industry to the ground” and “annihilate their navy.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.