Follow us on social

Willliam Luers Angelina Jolie

At 95, William Luers never stopped believing in a US-Iran détente

The career diplomat died Saturday, but he left a legacy, and a playbook for peace

Analysis | QiOSK

Ambassador William H. Luers, whose active promotion of American diplomacy as a primary component of U.S. foreign policy continued well into his 90s, died Saturday at his home in Connecticut at the age of 95.

After a 31-year career in the foreign service, the Quincy Institute was proud to count him as a distinguished non-resident fellow.

His post-retirement career was certainly active: Luers served as president of the Metropolitan Museum of Art and as both chairman and president of the United Nations Association of the U.S.A. He was a key leader of The Iran Project, a group of scholars and retired diplomats and military committed to preventing Iran’s acquisition of a nuclear weapon and averting a military conflict in the region.

"Bill was an absolute giant. His work to strengthen diplomacy's role in U.S. foreign policy cannot be overstated,” said Quincy Institute Executive Vice President Trita Parsi. “Without him, there would never have been a nuclear deal with Iran, for instance."

The Iran Project to this day serves as a valuable hub for policymakers and analysts seeking to avoid misunderstandings between Iran and the U.S. in the process of finding diplomatic solutions to prevent an Iranian nuclear weapon.

President Barack Obama personally credited Luers’ work at The Iran Project for bringing about the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and the P5+1.

“Thanks to you at The Iran Project for your leadership on the nuclear deal,” wrote Obama in a handwritten note published in Luers’ memoir, Uncommon Company: Dissidents and Diplomats, Enemies and Artists. “It made a huge difference, and the world will be better for it.”

Luers enthusiastically sought to democratize foreign policy, touting the importance of art and culture — particularly music — to bridge cultures and overcome political barriers in the service of diplomacy.

Luers served as U.S. Ambassador to Czechoslovakia from 1983 to 1986, playing a pivotal role in building up the international celebrity of Vaclav Havel to protect him from assassination, a subtle act of diplomacy helping lay the groundwork for the country’s Velvet Revolution and Czechoslovakia’s transition from a one-party state and command economy to a parliamentary republic with Havel as the first president of the newly formed Czech Republic.

“Diplomacy and the arts. So completely do I believe in their collaborative power that I have spent fifty years advocating for them, fighting for them, and celebrating all that has been accomplished in their names,” wrote Luers in his 2024 memoir.

His book ended not on the note of a retired diplomat well into his 90s looking back at a life well-lived, but as a youthful problem-solver, drawn to the world’s toughest problems and asking how American diplomacy could be harnessed to end violent conflict and further the common-good. He wrote:

“With an unflinching belief in the fundamental principle of talking to the other in uncommon company, I am persuaded that we must talk even with Putin or his closest advisors to see when and whether he would be prepared to share his own thoughts on how to organize an end to the war with Ukraine. Some way must be found to seek back-channel communications with the Kremlin, with friends and associates of Putin, to determine whether there is an inclination to address our differences and explore ways to end this conflict with Ukraine. The demonization of Putin is fully understandable given the inhumanity of this war between Russia and Ukraine, but the need to converse with uncommon company, including your enemies, should override the hatred and hostility of the enemy. If the US is engaged in supporting a military conflict or conducting a military conflict, it must set objectives short of total victory. Incidentally, wins that are achievable allow the US to sustain conflicts without having to face up to humiliating defeat or endless wars.”

He is survived by his wife Wendy Woods Luers, three children, two stepchildren, five grandchildren and five step-grandchildren.


Top photo credit: Angelina Jolie poses for pictures with UNA-USA president William Luers during the United Nations Association of the USA awards dinner in New York on October 11, 2005. Jolie was honored with the 2005 UN Global Humanitarian Action Award for her work as a Goodwill Ambassador with refugees around the world. REUTERS/Seth Wenig
Analysis | QiOSK
Mark Levin
Top photo credit: Erick Stakelbeck on TBN/Screengrab

The great fade out: Neocon influencers rage as they diminish

Media

Mark Levin appears to be having a meltdown.

The veteran neoconservative talk host is repulsed by reports that President Donald Trump might be inching closer to an Iranian nuclear deal, reducing the likelihood of war. In addition to his rants on how this would hurt Israel, Levin has been howling to anyone who will listen that any deal with Iran needs approval from Congress (funny he doesn’t have the same attitude for waging war, only for making peace).

keep readingShow less
american military missiles
Top photo credit: Fogcatcher/Shutterstock

5 ways the military industrial complex is a killer

Latest

Congress is on track to finish work on the fiscal year 2025 Pentagon budget this week, and odds are that it will add $150 billion to its funding for the next few years beyond what the department even asked for. Meanwhile, President Trump has announced a goal of over $1 trillion for the Pentagon for fiscal year 2026.

With these immense sums flying out the door, it’s a good time to take a critical look at the Pentagon budget, from the rationales given to justify near record levels of spending to the impact of that spending in the real world. Here are five things you should know about the Pentagon budget and the military-industrial complex that keeps the churn going.

keep readingShow less
Sudan
Top image credit: A Sudanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed combat vehicle as Sudan's army retakes ground and some displaced residents return to ravaged capital in the state of Khartoum Sudan March 26, 2025. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig

Will Sudan attack the UAE?

Africa

Recent weeks events have dramatically cast the Sudanese civil war back into the international spotlight, drawing renewed scrutiny to the role of external actors, particularly the United Arab Emirates.

This shift has been driven by Sudan's accusations at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against the UAE concerning violations of the Genocide Convention, alongside drone strikes on Port Sudan that Khartoum vociferously attributes to direct Emirati participation. Concurrently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly reaffirmed the UAE's deep entanglement in the conflict at a Senate hearing last week.

From Washington, another significant and sudden development also surfaced last week: the imposition of U.S. sanctions on the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) for alleged chemical weapons use. This dramatic accusation was met by an immediate denial from Sudan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which vehemently dismissed the claims as "unfounded" and criticized the U.S. for bypassing the proper international mechanisms, specifically the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, despite Sudan's active membership on its Executive Council.

Despite the gravity of such an accusation, corroboration for the use of chemical agents in Sudan’s war remains conspicuously absent from public debate or reporting, save for a January 2025 New York Times article citing unnamed U.S. officials. That report itself contained a curious disclaimer: "Officials briefed on the intelligence said the information did not come from the United Arab Emirates, an American ally that is also a staunch supporter of the R.S.F."

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.