Follow us on social

google cta
Diplomacy Watch Putin Trump Zelenskyy Ukraine

Diplomacy Watch: Are Kyiv protests pent-up anger against Zelensky?

Even EU leadership lashed out over the president's anti-corruption legislation, after which he was forced to back-peddle

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

As uneventful diplomatic talks in Istanbul wrap up with little more than talk of a prisoners of war swap and a push for more meetings, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky apparently has another problem on his hands — his own people.

This week, the largest protests against the Zelensky government since the war started rocked major Ukrainian cities. Ukrainians protesting the new law, which Zelensky says curtails Russian influence, but critics say strips key anti-corruption bodies, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO), of their independence from the Ukrainian government. Namely, Ukraine's prosecutor general, appointed by Zelensky, would receive new powers over NABU and SAPO in the process.

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen even suggested the legislation, which she says conflicts with Europe’s “respect for the rule of law,” could hinder Ukraine’s EU eligibility.

Reeling from the backlash, Zelensky has been quick to backpedal. He handed a new anti-corruption bill to Ukraine’s Parliament on Thursday, which will re-establish NABU and SAPO’s independence from the Ukrainian government if it becomes law. The Parliament will consider the new legislation next week.

"Everyone has heard what people are saying these days... on social media, to each other, on the streets. It's not falling on deaf ears," Zelensky said in an address Wednesday evening.

Some protestors say they will back down if Zelensky changes course on his new law. But others see a unique opportunity to demonstrate broader frustrations with the government, its history of corruption, and handling of the war. This may spell further political trouble for Zelensky.

“If people are out protesting now, it's not because they admire and support NABU and SAPO... It's because this spark makes it permissible to express pent-up anger at Zelensky, his team and daily grotesque, in-your-face corruption,” Almut Rochowanski, activist and Quincy Institute non-resident fellow, wrote on X.

“Until now, expressing criticism of Zelensky has felt awkward, unpatriotic and in fact dangerous. They'd rather criticize some lower-level figure for this or that failure. In this sense, the elimination of NABU and SAPO's independence functions as a strawman,” she wrote.

In other Ukraine war news this week:

Citing the Telegram account of Russian-appointed local official Vladimir Saldo, Al Jazeera reported that a Ukrainian drone strike hit a private bus in Russian-occupied Kherson. The attack killed three people and, according to Saldo, three more are injured and “in serious condition.”

The Netherlands will "substantially contribute" towards Patriot air defense system deliveries to Ukraine, according to Newsweek. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans wrote on X Monday that details regarding these Patriot deliveries "will be worked out soon.” According to DW, Germany has also pledged to provide 5 Patriot missile systems to Kyiv.

Now that Trump has established a 50 day deadline for Russia to end the Ukraine war, the New York Times reports that Republican lawmakers previously pushing a Russia sanctions package, which would have slapped 500% tariffs on countries buying Russian energy, have paused such efforts for the time being. Trump said he would impose a 100% tariff if his demands aren’t met.

From State Department:

At the State Department Press briefing on July 22, spokesperson Tammy Bruce explained that Trump’s 50 day deadline for Russia to attain peace in Ukraine is not “static.” Rather, she said this deadline is subject to the ebbs and flows of the war and its negotiations.

“I would caution, when the President notes a block of time or a window, that it could be any time in that window. We’ve already seen that in one instance. There is — at the same time, with negotiations — as I mentioned before without going into the details — if there’s a genuine negotiation happening and it is in – it’s in motion, then things can change rapidly; that the day you set up a window, two days later it can be different because of the conversations that have been had,” Bruce explained.

“We’ve seen him give windows before, and he’s acted very quickly within a block, and I think that’s why [the deadline Trump set] matters.”


Top Photo: Trump, Zelenskyy, and Putin with Ukraine graphic. Credit, Khody Akhavi
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
china trump
President Donald Trump announces the creation of a critical minerals reserve during an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 2, 2026. Trump announced the creation of “Project Vault,” a rare earth stockpile to lower reliance on China for rare earths and other resources. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA

Trump vs. his China hawks

Asia-Pacific

In the year since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, China hawks have started to panic. Leading lights on U.S. policy toward Beijing now warn that Trump is “barreling toward a bad bargain” with the Chinese Communist Party. Matthew Pottinger, a key architect of Trump’s China policy in his first term, argues that the president has put Beijing in a “sweet spot” through his “baffling” policy decisions.

Even some congressional Republicans have criticized Trump’s approach, particularly following his decision in December to allow the sale of powerful Nvidia AI chips to China. “The CCP will use these highly advanced chips to strengthen its military capabilities and totalitarian surveillance,” argued Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who chairs the influential Select Committee on Competition with China.

keep readingShow less
Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?
Top image credit: bluestork/shutterstock.com

Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?

Latin America

On January 7, the White House announced its plans to withdraw from 66 international bodies whose work it had deemed inconsistent with U.S. national interests.

While many of these organizations were international in nature, three of them were specific to the Americas — the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, and the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. The decision came on the heels of the Dominican Republic postponing the X Summit of the Americas last year following disagreements over who would be invited and ensuing boycotts.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.