Follow us on social

Randy sleeps Fine when asked about starving kids in Gaza

Randy sleeps Fine when asked about starving kids in Gaza

But he's not the only one on the Hill appearing to shrug off Israel's role and US support of it

Reporting | QiOSK

While over 100 Palestinians now die of hunger every day in Gaza, Congress remains peculiarly silent.

Members of antiwar group Code Pink asked lawmakers in the halls of Congress Tuesday about how they will help, repeatedly mentioning that Gazan children are now reportedly succumbing to malnutrition in greater numbers. But the lawmakers they managed to approach in their “Stop Starving Gaza Now” emergency action seemed uninterested, or otherwise suggested Hamas should address the crisis, either by releasing hostages or negotiating with Israel.

“Release the hostages,” Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.) said when asked what could be done. Fine is a staunch Israel supporter who’s been accused of “unhinged, racist and Islamophobic” rhetoric by Congressional colleagues and was ratioed on X yesterday for saying “starve away” in regards to Gazan civilians. He also called reports of starvation “a lie” and "Muslim terror propaganda."

“Get in touch with my office,” said Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.), a member of the House Armed Service and House Foreign Affairs committees, when asked about how the U.S. could get adequate food to dying Gazan children. “Thank you for coming by.”

“I’m talking on the phone,” another lawmaker quipped, brushing off questions altogether.

Members of Congress are in a unique position to change or otherwise challenge the current situation by leveraging the $3.3 billion in U.S. military aid to Israel per year.

But their efforts to do this have often gone belly up. Last week, for example, the House of Representatives voted 6-422 to shoot down Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's 2026 Department of Defense Appropriations Act amendment to block $500 million in additional military assistance to Israel.

The State Department supports the Israel- and U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) as a way to provide Palestinians meals, giving it $30 million toward its operations. But the IDF is accused of shooting Gazans at these centers almost every day, and humanitarian organizations say the food distributed is not nearly enough to keep 2 million people alive in this crisis situation. They are calling on the GHF to cease operations and allow the UN or other traditional NGOs to go in to do the work.

Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin said, “I see people starving… on purpose” when asked by one lawmaker to acknowledge that the situation takes “two sides” to negotiate.

State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce announced yesterday that Trump envoy Steve Witkoff will go to the Middle East to work on negotiations toward a Gaza ceasefire, and for an aid corridor to open in Gaza. Israel broke a previously negotiated ceasefire earlier this spring.

To date, Israel has killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians since October 2023, though some death toll estimates are much higher.


Top photo credit: July 15, 2025, U.S. Representative RANDY FINE (R-FL) speaking at a hearing of the House Committee on Education and Workforce about ''Antisemitism in Higher Education: Examining the Role of Faculty Funding and Ideology'', at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. (Credit Image: © Michael Brochstein/ZUMA Press Wire)
Reporting | QiOSK
POGO The Bunker
Top image credit: Project on Government Oversight

Are American 'boomers' at risk?

Military Industrial Complex

The Bunker appears originally at the Project on Government Oversight and is republished here with permission.


keep readingShow less
Nuclear explosion
Top image credit: Let’s curb loose talk of using lower-yield nuclear weapons

Reckless posturing: Trump says he wants to resume nuke testing

Global Crises

President Donald Trump’s October 29 announcement that the United States will restart nuclear weapons testing after more than 30 years marks a dangerous turning point in international security.

The decision lacks technical justification and appears solely driven by geopolitical posturing.

keep readingShow less
Sudan al-Fashir El Fasher
Top photo credit: The grandmother of Ikram Abdelhameed looks on next to her family while sitting at a camp for displaced people who fled from al-Fashir to Tawila, North Darfur, Sudan, October 27, 2025. REUTERS/Mohammed Jamal

Sudan's bloody war is immune to Trump's art of the deal

Africa

For over 500 days, the world watched as the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) methodically strangled the last major army garrison in Darfur through siege, starvation, and indiscriminate bombardment. Now, with the RSF’s declaration of control over the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) Sixth Infantry Division headquarters in El Fasher, that strategy has reached its grim conclusion.

The capture of the historic city is a significant military victory for the RSF and its leader, Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti, though it is victory that has left at least 1,500 civilians dead, including 100 patients in one hospital. It is one that formalizes the de facto partition of the country, with the RSF consolidating its control over all of Darfur, and governing from its newly established parallel government in Nyala, South Darfur.

The SAF-led state meanwhile, clings to the riverine center and the east from Port Sudan.

The Trump administration’s own envoy has now publicly voiced this fear, with the president’s senior adviser for Africa Massad Boulos warning against a "de facto situation on the ground similar to what we’ve witnessed in Libya.”

The fall of El Fasher came just a day after meetings of the so‑called “Quad,” a diplomatic forum which has brought together the United States, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the United Arab Emirates in Washington. As those meetings were underway, indirect talks were convened in the U.S. capital between a Sudanese government delegation led by Sudan’s foreign minister, and an RSF delegation headed by Algoney Dagalo, the sanctioned paramilitary’s procurement chief and younger brother of its leader.

The Quad’s joint statement on September 12, which paved the way for these developments by proposing a three-month truce and a political process, was hailed as a breakthrough. In reality, it was a paper-thin consensus among states actively fueling opposite sides of the conflict; it was dismissed from the outset by Sudan’s army chief.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.