Follow us on social

Afghan deportations Iran

Millions of Afghans forced to return to a hellscape the world forgot

Iran and Pakistan are deporting people in en masse back to a country where Taliban revenge and abuse, no jobs or food, and grinding poverty, await

Analysis | Middle East

It’s been a dark summer for Afghans. When Israel launched the 12-day war with Iran on June 13, Tehran used it as a pretext to scapegoat some of its most vulnerable residents.

In its latest wave of deportations, an estimated 700,000 Afghans have returned to Afghanistan since Iran began expulsions that month. Then on July 31, Pakistan launched the third phase of its “Illegal Foreigners Repatriation Plan,” announced in 2023, arresting and detaining Afghans across the country.

According to the International Organization for Migration, over four million people have returned from Iran and Pakistan to Afghanistan since 2023, with over two million returning just this year. The fourth anniversary of the Taliban takeover on August 15 came and went as Afghans return to a country where the human rights situation has deteriorated over the past four years.

Hunger looms. About half the population, or 23 million people, are estimated to depend on food aid before the end of the year. Among them are 3.5 million children, some of whom were born abroad and have never before set foot in Afghanistan.

And what do they return to?

With a central banking system disconnected by Western sanctions from the international SWIFT banking system and frozen assets, Afghanistan finds itself in a permanent economic crisis.

The country’s humanitarian sector and health system are collapsing. Thousands of public-sector jobs have been cut. Kabul is facing a major housing crisis. And some returnees are vulnerable to being targeted by Taliban fighters. Former government officials, Afghan National Defense and Security Forces soldiers, intelligence officers, police officers, and interpreters who collaborated with NATO forces, journalists, and activists are being abducted, detained, and, in some cases, subject to torture by the Taliban authorities, the United Nations reports.

“Sending people back to a country in which they are at risk of persecution, torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment or other irreparable harm, violates the core international law principle of non-refoulement,” U.N. Human Rights spokesperson Ravina Shamdasani said.

And while fewer Afghans have migrated to other Central Asian countries, they haven’t been welcome there either.

Tajikistan has routinely deported Afghans en masse for several years, a process that escalated again in June despite acceding to the 1951 Refugee Convention on the legal rights of refugees, including protections against refoulement when they are at risk of persecution.

The Taliban has publicly denounced the repatriations, Deputy Minister for Refugees and Repatriation Abdul Rahman Rashid calling them a “serious violation of international norms, humanitarian principles, and Islamic values.”

As for Iran, where persistent economic crises had fueled anti-immigrant sentiment, it had already announced before its war with Israel its intention to forcibly repatriate undocumented Afghans if they failed to leave voluntarily by July 6. Unsubstantiated accusations that Afghans were collaborating with Israel’s Mossad offered a convenient excuse for the regime’s security failures during the 12-day war.

“At the height of the war with Israel there was a lot of anger at the security failures of the [Iranian] state apparatus,” Ibraheem Bahiss, a Kabul-based expert for the International Crisis Group, told RS. “[I]t needs to somehow find a red herring to take the blame off.”

The Iranian authorities “used this popular discontent to carry out the [repatriation] policy,” Bahiss said. “It’s made it more difficult to plead with the Iranians to temper their approach.”

For Pakistan, in turn, rounding up Afghans for deportation has been used to pressure the Taliban, Bahiss explained, to halt its alleged support for the resurgence of the Tehrik-i-Taliban (TTP), a Pakistan-based insurgency that escalated drone attacks over the summer. The Afghan Taliban has provided the TTP refuge, but Islamabad’s deportation program appears designed primarily to distract its public from its own homegrown extremism problem and security failures.

Last month, Russia became the first country to normalize diplomatic ties with the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, an act that Afghanistan Foreign Minister Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi referred to as an “unprecedented step towards Afghanistan’s integration into the international community.” Keen on extending the Belt and Road Initiative into Afghanistan, China stepped up economic diplomacy at the first trilateral meeting with Afghanistan and Pakistan in Kabul last week. Qatar, and, to a lesser extent, Saudi Arabia have exerted a type of humanitarian diplomacy, with Qatar newly striking a deal to employ thousands of Afghans in the wake of Iran’s crackdowns.

Russia has tried to forge a “Grand Bargain” with the Taliban, Bahiss explained, referring to Moscow’s pressure on the predominantly Pashtun Taliban for an ethnically more inclusive government, and trade in the agricultural and fossil fuels sectors. Since the Taliban takeover, Russian presidential envoy to Afghanistan Zamir Kabulov expressed a desire for the Taliban to improve the human rights situation, including for women and girls, while insisting that Russia does not intend to interfere in Afghanistan’s internal affairs. Nine countries surrounding Afghanistan are likely to meet in Moscow this fall to discuss relations with Kabul.

A key priority for Russia aligns with that of the Taliban: to defeat the Islamic State and latent insurgencies, such as the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, that have Central Asian countries on alert. The Taliban’s campaigns against Islamic State — Khorasan Province have been lauded by the Muslim World League.

Afghanistan’s Foreign Ministry and the Russian Foreign Ministry did not respond to requests for comment.

“The Taliban leadership need to take responsibility for the ongoing and worsening humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan,” Fereshta Abbasi, Asia researcher with Human Rights Watch, said at a press briefing earlier this month. “We have called on states to ensure that human rights are a priority and a core point on the agenda every time that they are meeting with the Taliban.”

A coalition of 90 Afghan and international organizations that have been lobbying the U.N. Human Rights Council to create an independent mechanism to investigate, and if called for, prosecute rights abuses in Afghanistan before the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Court of Justice.

The ICC has already issued arrest warrants for two senior Taliban leaders, Haibatullah Akhundzada and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, based on the crime against humanity of persecution on gender and political grounds. All eyes are now on the EU to address the proposal at the next Human Rights Council session in September.

“It’s a sad thing, but access to countries to do human rights monitoring and documentation is becoming the exception rather than the rule,” Richard Bennett, the Human Rights Special Rapporteur on Afghanistan, said at this month’s briefing. The special rapporteur was barred from Afghanistan last year. “Maybe the Taliban don’t realize the political credit they had been getting by allowing me to visit, which they now lost,” he added.

“It’s a responsibility of all states, not only Western states,” Bennett said. “What’s happening in Afghanistan are crimes against humanity, crimes against the whole of humanity, which should shock our conscience and provoke action by all.”

In the meantime, millions of Afghans are returning to a country that is under repressive rule, where their gender, ethnicity, sexuality, and occupations put them at grave risk of becoming another statistic in a report denouncing crimes against humanity. Deportees with criminal records are subject to the Taliban’s interpretation of Sharia law, which legalized public flogging, amputations, stoning, and executions.

“The international community needs to distinguish between the de facto authorities and the Taliban in Afghanistan, and the people of Afghanistan,” Abbasi said. “They need to ensure that they are not punishing the people of Afghanistan for the Taliban’s acts.”


Afghan nationals, who were deported from Iran, wait to board a bus upon their arrival at the Islam Qala border crossing in Herat province, Afghanistan, July 22, 2025. REUTERS/Sayed Hassib
signal-2025-08-28-165306_002
Analysis | Middle East
Trump ASEAN
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump looks at Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., next to Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim when posing for a family photo with leaders at the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 26, 2025. Vincent Thian/Pool via REUTERS

‘America First’ meets ‘ASEAN Way’ in Kuala Lumpur

Asia-Pacific

The 2025 ASEAN and East Asia Summits in Kuala Lumpur beginning today are set to be consequential multilateral gatherings — defining not only ASEAN’s internal cohesion but also the shape of U.S.–China relations in the Indo-Pacific.

President Donald Trump’s participation will be the first by a U.S. president in an ASEAN-led summit since 2022. President Biden skipped the last two such summits in 2023 and 2024, sending then-Vice President Harris instead.

keep readingShow less
iran, china, russia
Top photo credit: Top image credit: Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov and and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi shake hands as Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu looks on during their meet with reporters after their meeting at Diaoyutai State Guest House on March 14, 2025 in Beijing, China. Lintao Zhang/Pool via REUTERS

'Annulled'! Russia won't abide snapback sanctions on Iran

Middle East

“A raider attack on the U.N. Security Council.” This was the explosive accusation leveled by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov this week. His target was the U.N. Secretariat and Western powers, whom he blamed for what Russia sees as an illegitimate attempt to restore the nuclear-related international sanctions on Iran.

Beyond the fiery rhetoric, Ryabkov’s statement contained a message: Russia, he said, now considers all pre-2015 U.N. sanctions on Iran, snapped back by the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) — the United Kingdom, France, Germany — “annulled.” Moscow will deepen its military-technical cooperation with Tehran accordingly, according to Ryabkov.

This is more than a diplomatic spat; it is the formal announcement of a split in international legal reality. The world’s major powers are now operating under two irreconcilable interpretations of international law. On one side, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany assert that the sanctions snapback mechanism of the JCPOA was legitimately triggered for Iran’s alleged violations. On the other, Iran, Russia, and China reject this as an illegitimate procedural act.

This schism was not inevitable, and its origin reveals a profound incongruence. The Western powers that most frequently appeal to the sanctity of the "rules-based international order" and international law have, in this instance, taken an action whose effects fundamentally undermine it. By pushing through a legal maneuver that a significant part of the Security Council considers illegitimate, they have ushered the world into a new and more dangerous state. The predictable, if imperfect, framework of universally recognized Security Council decisions is being replaced by a system where legal facts are determined by political interests espoused by competing power blocs.

This rupture followed a deliberate Western choice to reject compromises in a stand-off with Iran. While Iran was in a technical violation of the provisions of the JCPOA — by, notably, amassing a stockpile of highly enriched uranium (up to 60% as opposed to the 3.67% for a civilian use permissible under the JCPOA), there was a chance to avert the crisis. In the critical weeks leading to the snapback, Iran had signaled concessions in talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Cairo, in terms of renewing cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s inspectors.

keep readingShow less
On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants
Top Photo Credit: (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants

Europe

While diplomats labored to produce the Dayton Accords in 1995, then-Secretary of Defense Bill Perry advised, “No agreement is better than a bad agreement.” Given that Washington’s allies in London, Paris, Berlin and Warsaw are opposed to any outcome that might end the war in Ukraine, no agreement may be preferable. But for President Trump, there is no point in equating the illusion of peace in Ukraine with a meaningless ceasefire that settles nothing.

Today, Ukraine is mired in corruption, starting at the very highest levels of the administration in Kyiv. Sending $175 billion of borrowed money there "for however long it takes" has turned out to be worse than reckless. The U.S. national sovereign debt is surging to nearly $38 trillion and rising by $425 billion with each passing month. President Trump needs to turn his attention away from funding Joe Biden’s wars and instead focus on the faltering American economy.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.