Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1759932257-scaled

Western democracies far more hawkish on Russia than Asian counterparts: poll

A new survey reveals a sharp split between democratic publics over how to deal with the war in Ukraine.

Asia-Pacific
google cta
google cta

A majority of Indian citizens believe that the war in Ukraine has to end “as soon as possible,” even if that means Kyiv will have to make territorial concessions, according to a new poll from the European Council on Foreign Relations.

The survey reveals a sharp split between Western democracies and their counterparts in the Global South as Russia’s invasion nears its one-year anniversary. A plurality of people in the United States, Great Britain, and nine different European Union countries said Ukraine “needs to regain all its territory,” while 48 percent of respondents in Turkey, for example, called for a rapid end to the war.

The poll’s results suggest that, contrary to the view of many Western leaders, democratic publics do not necessarily view the war as an existential conflict between democracies and autocracies.

“Actually, what this war has done is divide democracies,” Hans Kundnani of Chatham House told Vox in a recent interview. “A lot of the world’s democracies outside of the West — in particular, the world’s largest democracy, India — just [don’t] see it that way.”

The ECFR survey polled nearly 20,000 respondents across 15 countries. While ECFR opted for an online poll in most countries, it conducted face-to-face interviews in Russia and India.

The split between democracies over how to handle the conflict appears to be rooted in strategic and perhaps even geographic considerations. Nearly 80 percent of Indian respondents described Russia as an “ally” or a “necessary partner with which we must strategically cooperate,” and a majority of those polled in Turkey described the Kremlin as a “necessary partner.”

Meanwhile, the vast majority of those surveyed in Western democracies described Russia as a “rival” or an active “adversary.”

Perhaps the most surprising division came over whether the war had revealed Russia to be stronger or weaker than previously thought. Roughly two-thirds of Indians and a plurality of Turks said they now view Russia as “much or somewhat stronger.” Remarkably, Indian respondents had a more positive view of Moscow’s strength than Russian citizens polled in the survey.

In the West, a plurality said they view Russia as “much or somewhat weaker” than before the war.


Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's shakes hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin before a June 2020 meeting. (Shutterstock/ Exposure Visuals)
google cta
Asia-Pacific
Trump $1.5 trillion
Top image credit: Richard Peterson via shutterstock.com

The reality of Trump’s cartoonish $1.5 trillion DOD budget proposal

Military Industrial Complex

After promising on the campaign trail that he would drive the war profiteers out of Washington, and appointing Elon Musk to trim the size of government across the board, some will be surprised at President Trump’s social media post on Wednesday that the U.S. should raise the Pentagon budget to $1.5 trillion. That would mean an unprecedented increase in military spending, aside from the buildup for World War II.

The proposal is absurd on the face of it, and it’s extremely unlikely that it is the product of a careful assessment of U.S. defense needs going forward. The plan would also add $5.8 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Budget.

keep readingShow less
Trump Venezuela
Top image credit: President Donald Trump monitors U.S. military operations in Venezuela, from Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, on Saturday, January 3, 2026. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

Trump's sphere of influence gambit is sloppy, self-sabotage

Latin America

Spheres of influence stem from the very nature of states and international relations. States will always seek to secure their interests by exerting influence over their neighbors, and the more powerful the state, the greater the influence that it will seek.

That said, sphere of influence strategies vary greatly, on spectrums between relative moderation and excess, humanity and cruelty, discreet pressure and open intimidation, and intelligence and stupidity; and the present policies of the Trump administration in the Western Hemisphere show disturbing signs of inclining towards the latter.

keep readingShow less
 Ngo Dinh Diem assassination
Top photo credit: Newspaper coverage of the coup and deaths, later ruled assassination of Vietnamese leader Ngo Dinh Diem and his brother Ngo Dinh Nhu. (Los Angeles Times)

JFK oversaw Vietnam decapitation. He didn't live to witness the rest.

Washington Politics

American presidents have never been shy about unseating foreign heads of state, by either overt or covert means. Since the late 19th century, our leaders have deposed, or tried to depose their counterparts in Iran, Cuba, Iraq, Afghanistan, the Philippines, Guatemala, Honduras, Panama, and elsewhere.

Our presidents indulge in regime change when they perceive foreign leaders as inimical to U.S. security or corporate interests. But such efforts can backfire. The 1961 attempt to topple Fidel Castro, organized under President Eisenhower and executed under President Kennedy, led to a slaughter of CIA-trained invasion forces at the Bay of Pigs and a triumph for Castro’s communist government. Despite being driven from power by President George W. Bush in retribution for the 9/11 attacks, the Taliban roared back in 2023, again making Afghanistan a haven for terrorist groups.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.