Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1759932257-scaled

Western democracies far more hawkish on Russia than Asian counterparts: poll

A new survey reveals a sharp split between democratic publics over how to deal with the war in Ukraine.

Asia-Pacific
google cta
google cta

A majority of Indian citizens believe that the war in Ukraine has to end “as soon as possible,” even if that means Kyiv will have to make territorial concessions, according to a new poll from the European Council on Foreign Relations.

The survey reveals a sharp split between Western democracies and their counterparts in the Global South as Russia’s invasion nears its one-year anniversary. A plurality of people in the United States, Great Britain, and nine different European Union countries said Ukraine “needs to regain all its territory,” while 48 percent of respondents in Turkey, for example, called for a rapid end to the war.

The poll’s results suggest that, contrary to the view of many Western leaders, democratic publics do not necessarily view the war as an existential conflict between democracies and autocracies.

“Actually, what this war has done is divide democracies,” Hans Kundnani of Chatham House told Vox in a recent interview. “A lot of the world’s democracies outside of the West — in particular, the world’s largest democracy, India — just [don’t] see it that way.”

The ECFR survey polled nearly 20,000 respondents across 15 countries. While ECFR opted for an online poll in most countries, it conducted face-to-face interviews in Russia and India.

The split between democracies over how to handle the conflict appears to be rooted in strategic and perhaps even geographic considerations. Nearly 80 percent of Indian respondents described Russia as an “ally” or a “necessary partner with which we must strategically cooperate,” and a majority of those polled in Turkey described the Kremlin as a “necessary partner.”

Meanwhile, the vast majority of those surveyed in Western democracies described Russia as a “rival” or an active “adversary.”

Perhaps the most surprising division came over whether the war had revealed Russia to be stronger or weaker than previously thought. Roughly two-thirds of Indians and a plurality of Turks said they now view Russia as “much or somewhat stronger.” Remarkably, Indian respondents had a more positive view of Moscow’s strength than Russian citizens polled in the survey.

In the West, a plurality said they view Russia as “much or somewhat weaker” than before the war.


Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's shakes hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin before a June 2020 meeting. (Shutterstock/ Exposure Visuals)
google cta
Asia-Pacific
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?
Top image credit: Sens. Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) sit look on during a congressional hearing in January, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Sipa USA)

Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?

Washington Politics

On Wednesday, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) told CNN that he would support new funding for the U.S. war with Iran — but only if Israel and Arab Gulf states help pay for it.

“We’re using our taxpayer money to protect those countries,” Gallego said. “We’re using our men to protect these countries. They need to throw in and have skin in the game too.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.