Follow us on social

Senegalese_and_malian_soldiers_train_with_u.s._special_forces_in_mali_01-e1626197791243

Is the White House completely truthful about where our troops are fighting?

Recent arraignment of Mauritanian national reminds us of when the US fudged its operations in Mali.

Analysis | Africa

Last week, President Joe Biden sent a letter to the Speaker of the House and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, a report which the administration described as “consistent with the War Powers Resolution” and that aimed to “keep the Congress informed about deployments of United States Armed Forces equipped for combat.” 

The War Powers Resolution mandates the president to inform the Congress of any U.S. armed forces involved in hostilities within forty-eight hours, and to send Congress periodic reports on the status of the situation while armed forces remain. The President sends the reports every six months, with the last one sent in June.

While many of the status updates precisely mirror the language from the last report, the document on its own can be a useful one. It confirmed the presence of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Kosovo, Lebanon, Niger, and elsewhere, with many military operations being justified as in support of United States counterterrorism efforts. 

But a news story over the weekend serves as a reminder that these often routine reports do not always tell the whole story of U.S. military engagement overseas.

A Mauritanian national accused of playing a part in multiple terrorist attacks in Mali in 2015 was arraigned in federal court in Brooklyn on Saturday. The charges include his role in a November 2015 attack on Radisson Blu Hotel in Bamako, in which a U.S. citizen was killed. 

The suspected terrorist, Fawaz Ould Ahmed Ould Ahemeid, has already been sentenced in Mali and the circumstances surrounding his extradition to the United States are not yet clear. 

According to an Army Times report from 2019, “At the time of the incident, Pentagon officials said that U.S. military personnel did not directly participate in the operation and left the clearing of the hotel to Malian forces,” but an Army special operator was later honored with the  Distinguished Service Cross for his role in an overseas contingency operation on the same date as the attack in Bamako.  

As Brian Finucane, a Senior Adviser for the U.S. Program at the International Crisis Group noted on Twitter: “The involvement of US armed forces is significant from a War Powers perspective, as this incident was never reported to Congress as seemingly required by the War Powers Resolution.” A database compiled by the War Powers Resolution Reporting Project at the NYU law school’s Reiss Center on Law and Security shows that Mali has never been mentioned in any of the unclassified 48-hour reports submitted to Congress 

The 2015 attack in Mali was one of eight incidents of U.S. hostilities in the last seven years — across three presidential administrations and five African countries — that the executive branch failed to report to Congress within the required forty-eight hour window, according to a recent report from the International Crisis Group.

Senegalese Special Forces soldiers conduct close-quarter battle drills with U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF) advisors during a military training engagement May 11, 2010 in Bamako, Mali as part of Exercise Flintlock 10 sponsored by AFRICOM. (May 2010) (U.S. Army photo/Michael R. Noggle)
Analysis | Africa
Diplomacy Watch: Russia retaliates after long-range missile attacks
Diplomacy Watch: Ukraine uses long-range missiles, Russia responds

Diplomacy Watch: Russia retaliates after long-range missile attacks

QiOSK

As the Ukraine War passed its 1,000-day mark this week, the departing Biden administration made a significant policy shift by lifting restrictions on key weapons systems for the Ukrainians — drawing a wave of fury, warnings and a retaliatory ballistic missile strike from Moscow.

On Thursday, Russia launched what the Ukrainian air force thought to be a non-nuclear intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) attack on the Ukrainian city of Dnipro, which if true, would be the first time such weapons were used and mark a major escalatory point in the war.

keep readingShow less
Netanyahu Gallant
Top image credit: FILE PHOTO: Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and defense minister Yoav Gallant during a press conference in the Kirya military base in Tel Aviv , Israel , 28 October 2023. ABIR SULTAN POOL/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

ICC issues arrest warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant

QiOSK

On Thursday the International Court of Justice (ICC) issued warrants for the arrest of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, as well as a member of Hamas leadership.

The warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant were for charges of crimes against humanity and war crimes. The court unanimously agreed that the prime minister and former defense minister “each bear criminal responsibility for the following crimes as co-perpetrators for committing the acts jointly with others: the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts.”

keep readingShow less
Ukraine landmines
Top image credit: A sapper of the 24th mechanized brigade named after King Danylo installs an anti-tank landmine, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, on the outskirts of the town of Chasiv Yar in the Donetsk region, Ukraine October 30, 2024. Oleg Petrasiuk/Press Service of the 24th King Danylo Separate Mechanized Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces/Handout via REUTERS

Ukrainian civilians will pay for Biden's landmine flip-flop

QiOSK

The Biden administration announced today that it will provide Ukraine with antipersonnel landmines for use inside the country, a reversal of its own efforts to revive President Obama’s ban on America’s use, production, transfer, and stockpiling of the indiscriminate weapons anywhere except the Korean peninsula.

The intent of this reversal, one U.S. official told the Washington Post, is to “contribute to a more effective defense.” The landmines — use of which is banned in 160 countries by an international treaty — are expected to be deployed primarily in the country’s eastern territories, where Ukrainian forces are struggling to defend against steady advances by the Russian military.

keep readingShow less

Election 2024

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.