Follow us on social

Senegalese_and_malian_soldiers_train_with_u.s._special_forces_in_mali_01-e1626197791243

Is the White House completely truthful about where our troops are fighting?

Recent arraignment of Mauritanian national reminds us of when the US fudged its operations in Mali.

Analysis | Africa

Last week, President Joe Biden sent a letter to the Speaker of the House and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, a report which the administration described as “consistent with the War Powers Resolution” and that aimed to “keep the Congress informed about deployments of United States Armed Forces equipped for combat.” 

The War Powers Resolution mandates the president to inform the Congress of any U.S. armed forces involved in hostilities within forty-eight hours, and to send Congress periodic reports on the status of the situation while armed forces remain. The President sends the reports every six months, with the last one sent in June.

While many of the status updates precisely mirror the language from the last report, the document on its own can be a useful one. It confirmed the presence of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Kosovo, Lebanon, Niger, and elsewhere, with many military operations being justified as in support of United States counterterrorism efforts. 

But a news story over the weekend serves as a reminder that these often routine reports do not always tell the whole story of U.S. military engagement overseas.

A Mauritanian national accused of playing a part in multiple terrorist attacks in Mali in 2015 was arraigned in federal court in Brooklyn on Saturday. The charges include his role in a November 2015 attack on Radisson Blu Hotel in Bamako, in which a U.S. citizen was killed. 

The suspected terrorist, Fawaz Ould Ahmed Ould Ahemeid, has already been sentenced in Mali and the circumstances surrounding his extradition to the United States are not yet clear. 

According to an Army Times report from 2019, “At the time of the incident, Pentagon officials said that U.S. military personnel did not directly participate in the operation and left the clearing of the hotel to Malian forces,” but an Army special operator was later honored with the  Distinguished Service Cross for his role in an overseas contingency operation on the same date as the attack in Bamako.  

As Brian Finucane, a Senior Adviser for the U.S. Program at the International Crisis Group noted on Twitter: “The involvement of US armed forces is significant from a War Powers perspective, as this incident was never reported to Congress as seemingly required by the War Powers Resolution.” A database compiled by the War Powers Resolution Reporting Project at the NYU law school’s Reiss Center on Law and Security shows that Mali has never been mentioned in any of the unclassified 48-hour reports submitted to Congress 

The 2015 attack in Mali was one of eight incidents of U.S. hostilities in the last seven years — across three presidential administrations and five African countries — that the executive branch failed to report to Congress within the required forty-eight hour window, according to a recent report from the International Crisis Group.


Senegalese Special Forces soldiers conduct close-quarter battle drills with U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF) advisors during a military training engagement May 11, 2010 in Bamako, Mali as part of Exercise Flintlock 10 sponsored by AFRICOM. (May 2010) (U.S. Army photo/Michael R. Noggle)
Analysis | Africa
Nato Summit Trump
Top photo credit: NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, President Donald Trump, at the 2025 NATO Summit in The Hague (NATO/Flickr)

Did Trump just dump the Ukraine War into the Europeans' lap?

Europe

The aerial war between Israel and Iran over the past two weeks sucked most of the world’s attention away from the war in Ukraine.

The Hague NATO Summit confirms that President Donald Trump now sees paying for the war as Europe’s problem. It’s less clear that he will have the patience to keep pushing for peace.

keep readingShow less
Antonio Guterres and Ursula von der Leyen
Top image credit: Alexandros Michailidis / Shutterstock.com

UN Charter turns 80: Why do Europeans mock it so?

Europe

Eighty years ago, on June 26, 1945, the United Nations Charter was signed in San Francisco. But you wouldn’t know it if you listened to European governments today.

After two devastating global military conflicts, the Charter explicitly aimed to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war.” And it did so by famously outlawing the use of force in Article 2(4). The only exceptions were to be actions taken in self-defense against an actual or imminent attack and missions authorized by the U.N. Security Council to restore collective security.

keep readingShow less
IRGC
Top image credit: Tehran Iran - November 4, 2022, a line of Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps troops crossing the street (saeediex / Shutterstock.com)

If Iranian regime collapses or is toppled, 'what's next?'

Middle East

In a startling turn of events in the Israel-Iran war, six hours after Iran attacked the Al Udeid Air Base— the largest U.S. combat airfield outside of the U.S., and home of the CENTCOM Forward Headquarters — President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire in the 12-day war, quickly taking effect over the subsequent 18 hours. Defying predictions that the Iranian response to the U.S. attack on three nuclear facilities could start an escalatory cycle, the ceasefire appears to be holding. For now.

While the bombing may have ceased, calls for regime change have not. President Trump has backtracked on his comments, but other influential voices have not. John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, said Tuesday that regime change must still happen, “…because this is about the regime itself… Until the regime itself is gone, there is no foundation for peace and security in the Middle East.” These sentiments are echoed by many others to include, as expected, Reza Pahlavi, exiled son of the deposed shah.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.