Follow us on social

Senegalese_and_malian_soldiers_train_with_u.s._special_forces_in_mali_01-e1626197791243

Is the White House completely truthful about where our troops are fighting?

Recent arraignment of Mauritanian national reminds us of when the US fudged its operations in Mali.

Analysis | Africa

Last week, President Joe Biden sent a letter to the Speaker of the House and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, a report which the administration described as “consistent with the War Powers Resolution” and that aimed to “keep the Congress informed about deployments of United States Armed Forces equipped for combat.” 

The War Powers Resolution mandates the president to inform the Congress of any U.S. armed forces involved in hostilities within forty-eight hours, and to send Congress periodic reports on the status of the situation while armed forces remain. The President sends the reports every six months, with the last one sent in June.

While many of the status updates precisely mirror the language from the last report, the document on its own can be a useful one. It confirmed the presence of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Kosovo, Lebanon, Niger, and elsewhere, with many military operations being justified as in support of United States counterterrorism efforts. 

But a news story over the weekend serves as a reminder that these often routine reports do not always tell the whole story of U.S. military engagement overseas.

A Mauritanian national accused of playing a part in multiple terrorist attacks in Mali in 2015 was arraigned in federal court in Brooklyn on Saturday. The charges include his role in a November 2015 attack on Radisson Blu Hotel in Bamako, in which a U.S. citizen was killed. 

The suspected terrorist, Fawaz Ould Ahmed Ould Ahemeid, has already been sentenced in Mali and the circumstances surrounding his extradition to the United States are not yet clear. 

According to an Army Times report from 2019, “At the time of the incident, Pentagon officials said that U.S. military personnel did not directly participate in the operation and left the clearing of the hotel to Malian forces,” but an Army special operator was later honored with the  Distinguished Service Cross for his role in an overseas contingency operation on the same date as the attack in Bamako.  

As Brian Finucane, a Senior Adviser for the U.S. Program at the International Crisis Group noted on Twitter: “The involvement of US armed forces is significant from a War Powers perspective, as this incident was never reported to Congress as seemingly required by the War Powers Resolution.” A database compiled by the War Powers Resolution Reporting Project at the NYU law school’s Reiss Center on Law and Security shows that Mali has never been mentioned in any of the unclassified 48-hour reports submitted to Congress 

The 2015 attack in Mali was one of eight incidents of U.S. hostilities in the last seven years — across three presidential administrations and five African countries — that the executive branch failed to report to Congress within the required forty-eight hour window, according to a recent report from the International Crisis Group.


Senegalese Special Forces soldiers conduct close-quarter battle drills with U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF) advisors during a military training engagement May 11, 2010 in Bamako, Mali as part of Exercise Flintlock 10 sponsored by AFRICOM. (May 2010) (U.S. Army photo/Michael R. Noggle)
Analysis | Africa
US army
Top photo credit: US Army/US Department of Defense

The US Army is about to get smaller, especially in Europe

Military Industrial Complex

What are the Trump administration’s plans for the U.S. Army at home and abroad?

The question hung over recent House and Senate hearings with Pentagon officials about security challenges facing the United States. “The Department [of Defense (DoD)] is undergoing a global force posture review…No decisions have been made at this time,” the acting assistant secretary for international security affairs, Katherine Thompson, responded at one session when asked about the possibility of changes to the U.S. military footprint in Europe.

keep readingShow less
Ben Gvir Kristi Noem
Top photo credit: Ben Gvir (Shutterstock/Barak Shacked) and Kristi Noem (Shutterstock/Maxim Elramsisy)

Is Trump orbit rolling out red carpet for Israeli extremist Ben Gvir?

Middle East

Few American politicians can claim to back Israel more emphatically than Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.).

Since the Oct. 7 attacks, Torres has dedicated himself to defending Israel and striking out against those who criticize its war in Gaza, earning him the moniker of “Israel’s loudest House supporter.” These efforts have garnered high praise from Israeli leadership. “Congressman Torres reflects our extraordinary ties and true friendship,” Israel’s defense minister said last year after meeting with the lawmaker.

keep readingShow less
Trump team opts to keep US shell companies in the shadows
Top image credit: Zenza Flarini

Trump team opts to keep US shell companies in the shadows

Military Industrial Complex

On March 21, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that U.S. shell companies and their owners can once again conceal their identities — a move critics warn could weaken national security and spur illicit financial activity that puts the American public at risk.

Treasury’s initial beneficial ownership information (BOI) disclosure requirement for all companies with less than 20 employees garnered bipartisan support and Trump’s approval during his first administration, but it was short-lived. Officially brought into force last January 2024, and then stymied by lawsuits, the requirement passed its final legal roadblock in February 2025 — only to be shelved a month later by the administration.

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.