Follow us on social

Kirby

Warning of 'imminent' Iranian attack in Saudi Arabia raises eyebrows

The Biden administration must be on guard against being manipulated by Riyadh to extract more US military support.

Analysis | Middle East

The Saudi government has reportedly shared intelligence with the Biden administration that there are preparations underway for an “imminent” Iranian attack against their country. 

According to The Wall Street Journal’s report on Tuesday, the U.S. and several other states in the region have raised the alert level of their militaries in response to this claim. For the record, Iranian officials have denied the substance of these reports. 

The Saudi claims raise the specter of a new crisis with Iran and the escalation of regional tensions. The Biden administration must be on guard against being manipulated by the Saudis to extract more U.S. military support, and under no circumstances should it allow the U.S. to be drawn into a new Middle Eastern conflict. 

The reports come at a time when U.S.-Saudi relations have worsened significantly and members of Congress have been floating possible punitive measures, including legislation that would require the withdrawal of all U.S. forces from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The Biden administration has been talking about the need to reevaluate the Saudi relationship, and they have even been considering slowing military assistance to the kingdom. 

A sudden security scare involving Iran is exactly what pro-Saudi hawks in the U.S. need to distract attention from the diverging interests of the United States and Saudi Arabia. It should go without saying that the Saudi claims should not be taken at face value. The Saudi government may be trying to tie the hands of its critics in Washington, and it may be trying to box in the Biden administration to stop them from slowing or halting military aid. 

It is possible that elements of the Iranian government might launch attacks to divert attention away from the ongoing violent crackdown against anti-government protests that have been roiling the country for the past several weeks. Iranian officials have blamed the U.S. and Saudi Arabia for fomenting the unrest.

Hardliners inside Iran have an incentive to stoke conflict, since they would stand to benefit from a crisis. Even so, there are also some good reasons to be skeptical about the Saudi claims about an “imminent” Iranian threat to their country. 

For one thing, there have been no attacks on Saudi territory attributed to Iranian forces since the 2019 drone strikes on the Aramco facilities at Abqaiq, and since then Iran and Saudi Arabia have been seeking to repair their frayed ties through negotiations mediated by the Iraqi government. This engagement has continued under the new Raisi government, and Iran and the UAE have also restored ties since Raisi took office. 

It would be an abrupt change for Iranian forces to lash out directly against Saudi Arabia after the last few years of diplomacy. For another, the Iranian government is facing enough internal problems because of the protests that erupted since the government’s morality police caused the death of Mahsa Amini on September 16, so it seems improbable that their government would want to risk a major security crisis at the same time that they are facing significant unrest. 

Finally, the timing of the Saudi claim is remarkably convenient for Riyadh after relations with the United States soured following the OPEC+ oil production cut that the Saudi government pushed through. 

The Kingdom knows that there are usually few things that get Washington’s immediate attention and support faster than raising the alarm about supposed Iranian threats. It was similar alarmism about Iranian “expansionism” in 2015 that led the Obama administration to make the terrible error of backing the Saudi-led coalition’s military intervention in Yemen. Whenever the Saudi government finds itself in trouble with critics in the U.S. because of its war crimes and human rights abuses, the government and their army of lobbyists are eager to emphasize their hostility to Iran as a reminder of why the U.S. should continue providing them with weapons and protection. 

It has worked in the past, but Americans should know by now that it leads to policies that are harmful to both U.S. interests and regional stability.

As for the warning of an “imminent” attack, we should recall how the Trump administration used the false claim of just such an attack on U.S. forces by Iranian proxies as its initial cover story for the January 2020 assassination of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani on Iraqi soil. If the Saudi government is attempting to goad the U.S. into using force against Iranian targets in the name of “pre-empting” this supposed attack, the Biden administration should rebuff their pleas. 

This is the same Saudi government that the administration says committed a “hostile act” with its support for an oil production cut, so the idea that the U.S. might even consider coming to their aid militarily should be a non-starter. U.S. interests are not served by the current status quo with Saudi Arabia, and those interests certainly won’t be served by fighting their battles for them.

Negotiations to revive the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the nonproliferation agreement with Iran, have been stalled for months, and since the start of the protests in Iran the Biden administration has become even less interested in pursuing further talks. Any Iranian military action against a neighboring country would make it that much harder to salvage a diplomatic solution to the impasse. It seems unlikely that the nuclear deal will be restored in any case, but anyone interested in heading off a potential nuclear crisis and the attendant drumbeat for war has to hope that the U.S. and Iran find a way to resume productive talks in the new year. 

The Biden administration should make it clear to Saudi Arabia that the U.S. isn’t going to resort to military action on their behalf. Whether Saudi claims about a planned Iranian attack are true or not, the U.S. needs to show that it will not be roped into providing more weapons and military assistance for a client government that has proven itself so unreliable and untrustworthy. Washington should send the message that Saudi choices to work against U.S. interests will have consequences for the kind and extent of security assistance they can expect to receive. 

The U.S. should not be putting its forces in harm’s way to defend Saudi Arabia or the UAE regardless of what Iran does. It is bad enough that U.S. forces are already at risk because of Houthi attacks on Saudi and UAE territory coming from Yemen. If the report of an impending Iranian attack is accurate, that just underscores the urgency of withdrawing those troops before they end up getting caught in the crossfire. 

If the Saudis are inventing or exaggerating the threat for their own purposes, that is more confirmation that their government can’t be trusted and doesn’t deserve the protection that the U.S. has been providing them. Any way you slice it, the U.S. should not be taking part in the rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and it should look to extricate itself from the region’s conflicts as soon as possible.


Former Pentagon Press Secretary John F. Kirby. (DOD Photo by Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Carlos M. Vazquez II)
Analysis | Middle East
Trump and Keith Kellogg
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump and Keith Kellogg (now Trump's Ukraine envoy) in 2017. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

Trump's silence on loss of Ukraine lithium territory speaks volumes

Europe

Last week, Russian military forces seized a valuable lithium field in the Donetsk region of Ukraine, the latest success of Moscow’s grinding summer offensive.

The lithium deposit in question is considered rather small by industry analysts, but is said to be a desirable prize nonetheless due to the concentration and high-quality of its ore. In other words, it is just the kind of asset that the Trump administration seemed eager to exploit when it signed its much heralded minerals agreement with Ukraine earlier this year.

keep readingShow less
Is the US now funding the bloodbath at Gaza aid centers?
Top photo credit: Palestinians walk to collect aid supplies from the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip, May 29, 2025. REUTERS/Hatem Khaled/File Photo

Is the US now funding the bloodbath at Gaza aid centers?

Middle East

Many human rights organizations say it should shut down. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have killed hundreds of Palestinians at or around its aid centers. And yet, the U.S. has committed no less than $30 million toward the controversial, Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).

As famine-like conditions grip Gaza, the GHF says it has given over 50 million meals to Palestinians at its four aid centers in central and southern Gaza Strip since late May. These centers are operated by armed U.S. private contractors, and secured by IDF forces present at or near them.

keep readingShow less
mali
Heads of state of Mali, Assimi Goita, Niger, General Abdourahamane Tiani and Burkina Faso, Captain Ibrahim Traore, pose for photographs during the first ordinary summit of heads of state and governments of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) in Niamey, Niger July 6, 2024. REUTERS/Mahamadou Hamidou//File Photo

Post-coup juntas across the Sahel face serious crises

Africa

In Mali, General Assimi Goïta, who took power in a 2020 coup, now plans to remain in power through at least the end of this decade, as do his counterparts in neighboring Burkina Faso and Niger. As long-ruling juntas consolidate power in national capitals, much of the Sahelian terrain remains out of government control.

Recent attacks on government security forces in Djibo (Burkina Faso), Timbuktu (Mali), and Eknewane (Niger) have all underscored the depth of the insecurity. The Sahelian governments face a powerful threat from jihadist forces in two organizations, Jama‘at Nusrat al-Islam wa-l-Muslimin (the Group for Supporting Islam and Muslims, JNIM, which is part of al-Qaida) and the Islamic State Sahel Province (ISSP). The Sahelian governments also face conventional rebel challengers and interact, sometimes in cooperation and sometimes in tension, with various vigilantes and community-based armed groups.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.