Follow us on social

Imran-khan-speech-e1667492592979

Imran Khan murder attempt the latest in Pakistan's bloody political history

Without changes in security protocols it is a matter of when — not if —another major national figure is assassinated.

Analysis | Middle East

Today’s attempted assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan comes at a time of heightened political division and violence. It is likely to only rally support around Khan and increase suspicion towards the country’s military establishment and PMLN-led government. 

Some protests against the military have already begun. Khan, 70, was shot in the leg, and has been transferred to a hospital in Lahore for treatment.

Assassination attempts against Pakistani leaders are nothing new, and today’s adds to a dark history of political violence. In 1951, Pakistan's first Prime Minister, Liaqat Ali Khan, was shot and killed while addressing supporters in a park that was renamed Liaqat Bagh. In October 2007, twin bomb blasts targeted former prime minister Benazir Bhutto’s procession, sparing her, but killing approximately 200 bystanders. She was killed two months later when gunmen and bomb blasts targeted her rally in Rawalpindi. 

A thorough investigation into Bhutto’s assassination was seemingly prevented, and many observers blame former military dictator Pervez Musharraf for her death. But it is worth noting that Musharraf himself faced several assassination attempts. More recently, former governor of Punjab Salman Taseer was killed by his own police bodyguard when he took up the case of a Pakistani Christian woman accused of blasphemy. 

Some observers in the United States may be inclined to view today’s events as exceptional or indicative of political breakdown in Pakistan. President Biden himself recently sparked controversy due to his remarks that the country was particularly dangerous since it possesses "nuclear weapons without any cohesion." 

But the U.S. has its own history of assassinations and violent political events ranging from the murder of JFK all the way to the January 6th riots. What makes Pakistan exceptional may be how little security still exists at high profile political demonstrations despite the looming threat of violence. When I attended one of then Prime Minister Imran Khan’s rallies in late March, I was surprised at the lax security measures which allowed crowds to filter in through an obviously defective metal detector, climb over barriers and up surrounding structures, and block egress routes. 

Without changes in security protocols it is a matter of when, not if a political assassination is successful. Of course, this would still fail to prevent insider attacks such as the one that led to Governor Taseer’s demise.

This assassination attempt comes at a time when Pakistan’s party politics are particularly divided and Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party is (at least publicly) at odds with the country’s military establishment. It also comes on the heels of the mysterious murder of self-exiled Pakistani journalist Arshad Sharif in Kenya.

The truth behind Khan's attempted assassin's motive may come out shortly or never at all. He could be an individual acting alone out of a personal grudge or political belief, extremist sympathizer, or be part of a conspiracy within Pakistan’s political system.

Nobody knows, and in some ways the actual truth is less consequential than the perceived explanations that will now flood Pakistan’s national discussion. It will assuredly radicalize and divide the country’s politics further at a time when Pakistan is still reeling from unprecedented flooding and economic dysfunction.


An Imran Khan rally in Islamabad, Pakistan, March, 27, 2022 (photo by Adam Weinstein)
Analysis | Middle East
Lockheed Martin NASA
Top photo credit: Lockheed Martin Space Systems in Littleton, Colo. Photo Credit: (NASA/Joel Kowsky)

The Pentagon spent $4 trillion over 5 years. Contractors got 54% of it.

Military Industrial Complex

Advocates of ever-higher Pentagon spending frequently argue that we must throw more money at the department to “support the troops.” But recent budget proposals and a new research paper issued by the Quincy Institute and the Costs of War Project at Brown University suggest otherwise.

The paper, which I co-authored with Stephen Semler, found that 54% of the Pentagon’s $4.4 trillion in discretionary spending from 2020 to 2024 went to military contractors. The top five alone — Lockheed Martin ($313 billion), RTX (formerly Raytheon, $145 billion), Boeing ($115 billion), General Dynamics ($116 billion), and Northrop Grumman ($81 billion) – received $771 billion in Pentagon contracts over that five year period.

keep readingShow less
China Malaysia
Top photo credit: Pearly Tan and Thinaah Muralitharan of Malaysia compete in the Women's Doubles Round Robin match against Nami Matsuyama and Chiharu Shida of Japan on day five of the BWF Sudirman Cup Finals 2025 at Fenghuang Gymnasium on May 1, 2025 in Xiamen, Fujian Province of China. (Photo by Zheng Hongliang/VCG )

How China is 'eating our lunch' with soft power

Asia-Pacific

In June 2025, while U.S. and Philippine forces conducted joint military drills in the Sulu Sea and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reaffirmed America’s commitment to the Indo-Pacific at Singapore’s Shangri-La Dialogue, another story deserving of attention played out less visibly.

A Chinese-financed rail project broke ground in Malaysia with diplomatic fanfare and local celebration. As Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim noted, the ceremony “marks an important milestone” in bilateral cooperation. The contrast was sharp: Washington sent ships and speeches; Beijing sent people and money.

keep readingShow less
President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev and President of Russia Vladimir Putin
Top photo credit: President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev and President of Russia Vladimir Putin appear on screen. (shutterstock/miss.cabul)

Westerners foolishly rush to defend Azerbaijan against Russia

Europe

The escalating tensions between Russia and Azerbaijan — marked by tit-for-tat arrests, accusations of ethnic violence, and economic sparring — have tempted some Western observers to view the conflict as an opportunity to further isolate Moscow.

However, this is not a simple narrative of Azerbaijan resisting Russian dominance. It is a complex struggle over energy routes, regional influence, and the future of the South Caucasus, where Western alignment with Baku risks undermining critical priorities, including potential U.S.-Russia engagement on Ukraine and arms control.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.