Follow us on social

Screen-shot-2022-08-18-at-4.50.37-pm

In Salma al-Shehab case, MBS again plays Biden for a fool

Weeks after the president got assurances that the Saudi crown prince is a "reformer," a twitter critic gets a 34-year prison sentence.

Analysis | Middle East

The Saudi government under the de facto rule of crown prince Mohammed bin Salman has become increasingly repressive with draconian punishments meted out even to the mildest and most innocuous dissenters.

It is not uncommon for the government to imprison critics for sending out a tweet that the authorities judge to be disloyal or just insufficiently enthusiastic in its support for official policy. The latest example of the Saudi government’s obnoxious crackdown came with the sentencing of Salma al-Shehab, a 34-year-old Saudi PhD student at the University of Leeds, to 34 years in prison for following and retweeting other dissidents and activists on Twitter. 

According to human rights observers, her sentence is the longest one ever given to any Saudi activist. She had initially been sentenced to six years in prison, which was already appalling, but then her sentence was increased after she appealed. 

Condemning an innocent woman to decades in prison for nothing more than using social media shows the Saudi government’s cruel repression of their own people and its cynical use of its so-called counterterrorism law to quash criticism of the government. It is one more example that explodes the lie that the crown prince is a reforming modernizer. As the European Saudi Organization for Human Rights said, the sentence “confirms that Saudi Arabia deals with those who demand reforms and critics on social networks as terrorists.”

Saudi Arabia has long been ruled by an authoritarian regime, but in the last few years it has become even more of a police state than before. The Biden administration claimed after the president’s visit to Saudi Arabia that he had received commitments “with respect to reforms and institutional safeguards” to prevent abusive treatment of dissidents in the future, but the outrageous sentence handed down in this case just a few weeks after Biden left proves that these commitments were worthless. 

The Washington Post reached the same conclusion in a scathing editorial this week, saying that the “Saudi promises to Mr. Biden were a farce.” The warnings from Saudi dissidents ahead of the president’s visit were correct: meeting with the crown prince would encourage him to crack down even more on his critics in the knowledge that Washington would say little and do nothing in response.

It is now imperative that the Biden administration correct their earlier mistakes and put significant pressure on Riyadh that they have thus far been unwilling to apply. 

The crown prince and his enforcers have been bent on tracking and punishing dissidents residing abroad, and the government has used social media to target, harass, and threaten many Saudi activists. Saud al-Qahtani, one of the crown prince’s top aides and one of the men deeply involved in the plot to murder Jamal Khashoggi, has been instrumental in running the Saudi government’s program to promote pro-government propaganda online and to identify the Saudis living in the diaspora that they want to silence. 

As journalist Ben Hubbard detailed in his book, MBS, al-Qahtani has been responsible for “spearheading a frenzied online McCarthyism.” The army of cyber-trolls he oversees pushes out the official government line and goes after anyone that they perceive as deviating from it. He and his “electronic flies,” as they are sometimes called by critics, have been spreading a new narrative of authoritarian nationalism and branding anyone that steps out of line as traitors.

Madawi al-Rasheed describes these troll farms in Saudi Arabia in her book, The Son King:

 “Under the pretext of defending the nation, the government’s infamous cyber-army intimidates activists both inside and outside Saudi Arabia. They send Twitter messages to exiled Saudis and threaten them with kidnapping and assassination. They are also experienced in hacking dissidents’ online accounts and implementing a pervasive surveillance regime, using the latest imported technology from the USA, Europe, and Israel.”

 It was reportedly a Saudi troll that flagged Salma al-Shehab’s Twitter activity through a “snitching app,” and two months later she was arrested when she returned to the kingdom on holiday in late 2020. 

Salma al-Shehab is only one of the most recent victims of this expanding digital authoritarian system. For example, Dr. Salman Alodah remains in prison five years after he wrote a tweet expressing a desire for reconciliation with Qatar at the start of the Saudi-led blockade of that country. Five years later, the blockade of Qatar has ended, but Alodah is being held without having been convicted of anything. 

The new campaign of repression has been going on for the last five years, and according to a recent report for The Economistby Nicolas Pelham thousands of Saudi citizens from all walks of life have been detained. In addition to detaining more critics for the flimsiest of reasons, the government’s crackdown has become much bloodier as well. Despite promising to move away from the use of capital punishment, Mohammed bin Salman has presided over a significant increase in the number of executions, including the mass executions of dozens of prisoners, many of whom were convicted on trumped-up charges of terrorism following sham trials. In just the first half of 2022 alone, the Saudi government has executed 120 people, and of those 81 were put to death in one day in March. 

The Biden administration’s response to the sentencing of Salma al-Shehab has so far been tepid and unsatisfactory. The State Department said Wednesday that the U.S. is “studying” the case, and the department spokesman Ned Price added, “Exercising freedom of expression to advocate for the rights of women should not be criminalized, it should never be criminalized.” That statement is a start, but it doesn’t amount to much on its own. 

The reality is that the Saudi government routinely criminalizes speech and treats dissent as if it were terrorism all the time, and it virtually never faces any criticism or pushback from Washington when it does so. The administration has an opportunity here to undo a little bit of the damage they did to their reputation and the reputation of the United States when they curried favor with the crown prince. 

To that end, Biden should press the Saudi government to drop the charges against Salma al-Shehab and allow her to return to her family in the U.K. 

Saudi Arabia is not and cannot be a reliable security partner when it treats speech as terrorism and locks up peaceful critics for years and decades at a time. When the U.S. supports and arms repressive governments like this one, it effectively gives its stamp of approval to their brutal methods and implicates itself in their abuses. 

As long as the Saudi government believes that there is nothing that they can do that jeopardizes Washington’s support, its behavior will only become more abusive and outrageous over time. Since Mohammed bin Salman gained power as crown prince, he has encountered no serious, sustained resistance from Washington, and he drew the lesson that he could act with impunity. It is time to make the crown prince and the Saudi government face consequences in the form of halted arms sales, greater scrutiny of human rights abuses, and more direct criticism. 


Saudi crown prince Mohhamed bin Salman (Reuters)/Salma al-Sehab (NBC News/screeengrab)/President Biden (DoD)
Analysis | Middle East
Somalia
Top image credit: U.S. forces host a range day with the Danab Brigade in Somalia, May 9, 2021. Special Operations Command Africa remains engaged with partner forces in Somalia in order to promote safety and stability across the Horn of Africa. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Zoe Russell)

Why the US can't beat al-Shabaab in Somalia

Africa

The New York Times reported earlier this month that recent gains by al-Shabaab Islamist militants in central and southern Somalia has prompted a debate within the State Department about closing the U.S. Embassy in Mogadishu and withdrawing most American personnel. At the forefront of some officials’ minds, according to the Times, are memories of recent foreign policy fiascos, such as the fall of the Afghan government amid a hasty American withdrawal in 2021.

There are good reasons to question why the U.S. has been unable to defeat al-Shabaab despite nearly 20 years of U.S. military involvement in the country. But the scale of the U.S. role is drastically different than that of Afghanistan, and the U.S. cannot necessarily be described as the most significant external security actor on the ground. At the same time, the Trump administration has given no indication that it will scale down drone strikes — meaning that the U.S. will continue to privilege military solutions.

keep readingShow less
Hegseth Guam
Top photo credit: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth departs Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, March 27, 2025. (DOD photo by U.S. Air Force Madelyn Keech)

Hegseth goes to 'spear point' Guam to prep for war with China

Asia-Pacific

The Guam headlines from the recent visit of the U.S. secretary of defense are only part of Secretary Hegseth’s maiden visit to the Pacific. It is Guam’s place in the larger picture - where the island fits into U.S. strategy - that helps us understand how the “tip of the spear” is being positioned. Perhaps overlooked, the arrangement of the “Guam piece” gives us a better sense not only of Guam’s importance to the United States, but also of how the U.S. sees the larger geopolitical competition taking shape.

Before he landed on Guam, the secretary of defense circulated a secret memo that prioritized U.S. readiness for a potential conflict with China over Taiwan. At the same time, it was reported that U.S. intelligence assessed that Guam would be “a major target of Chinese missile strikes” if China launched an invasion of Taiwan.

keep readingShow less
Pope Francis' legacy of inter-faith diplomacy
Top image credit: Pope Francis met with Grand Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani, one of the Muslim world's leading authorities on March 6, 2021 in Najaf, Iraq. (Vatican Media via REUTERS)

Pope Francis' legacy of inter-faith diplomacy

Global Crises

One of the most enduring tributes to Pope Francis, who passed away this Easter, would be the appreciation for his legacy of inter-religious diplomacy, a vision rooted in his humility, compassion, and a commitment to bridging divides — between faiths, cultures, and ideologies — from a standpoint of mutual respect and tolerance.

Among his most profound contributions is his historic meeting with Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani in Najaf, Iraq, on March 6, 2021. What made this meeting a true landmark in inter-faith dialogue was the fact it brought together, for the first time, the spiritual leader of the world’s 1.2 billion Roman Catholics and one of the most revered figures in Shia Islam, with influence on tens of millions of Shia Muslims globally. In a humble, yet moving ceremony, the meeting took place in al-Sistani’s modest home in Najaf. A frail al-Sistani, who rarely receives visitors and typically remains seated, stood to greet the 84-year-old Pope and held his hand, in a gesture that underscored mutual respect.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.