Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1117734413

Mexico's AMLO is a no-show at Biden's Summit of Americas

The Mexican president is the first to follow through on a boycott after the White House confirmed its snub of Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua.

Analysis | Latin America

Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said Monday morning that he will not attend this week's Summit of the Americas in Los Angeles, marking a blow against President Joe Biden's diplomatic plans in the Western Hemisphere.

López Obrador’s decision came after the White House officially announced that it will not invite Cuba, Nicaragua, or Venezuela to the event, citing concerns about human rights and authoritarian governance. The move is the latest flashpoint in weeks of drama over the summit’s guest list, with López Obrador, also known as AMLO, and other regional leaders threatening to boycott the event if Biden kept his promise to snub the three countries.

The Mexican president’s absence will make it harder to make progress on the summit’s wide-ranging agenda, which will cover everything from democracy to climate change and inequality in the region during a series of high-level meetings from Wednesday through Friday. It’s also a bit embarrassing given recent comments from White House official Juan Gonzalez that the White House is “really confident that the summit will be well-attended,” and that Biden “very personally wants the president of Mexico there.”

And the consequences go beyond abstract foreign policy and image concerns, according to Aileen Teague of the Quincy Institute. “A summit with critical partners missing would also deliver a huge blow to Biden’s attempts to find solutions to U.S. domestic problems that range from border security to immigration flows to the rise in oil and gas prices,” Teague wrote in a recent piece for Responsible Statecraft.

The controversy also shows a weakness of Biden’s strategy for fighting authoritarianism. As Teague wrote, Biden’s attempt to strengthen ties with democratic partners in the region has had the opposite effect, weakening relations with Mexico and other democracies in the Americas. She added that America’s position on the summit is “hypocritical” and “inconsistent,” noting America’s historical support for Latin American dictators when convenient for US policy.

Reuters reported last month that Biden considered inviting lower-level Cuban officials in order to get López Obrador’s support, but that plan was scuttled in favor of a decision to invite Cuban civil society leaders. US officials have said that they will also invite non-government representatives from Nicaragua and Venezuela, and some reports say Juan Guaidó — who the US recognizes as the Venezuelan president — could attend a virtual event on the sidelines of the conference.

The leaders of Guatemala, Honduras, Bolivia and several Caribbean countries also threatened to boycott the event in solidarity with blacklisted countries, potentially weakening the conference further and signaling a drop in U.S. influence in the region. As of Monday afternoon, no other countries have announced that they will be pulling out of the event.

Some argue the move could jeopardize the future of the summit itself. The event has been on life support since former President Donald Trump decided to skip the 2018 meeting, which only half of the region’s heads of state ended up attending. Trump surprised the region in 2019 by offering to host the next summit, but plans for that meeting were delayed after he suggested invading Venezuela in order to unseat Nicolás Maduro.

Observers expected that Biden’s election would put things back on track, especially given his campaign promise to emphasize diplomacy in his foreign policy. Moreover, President Barack Obama attended both the 2009 summit in Trinidad & Tobago and the 2015 summit in Panama, where he famously shook hands with Cuban President Raul Castro, and many assumed Biden would follow suit. 

But the president has shown no intention of following Obama’s line in the region, likely due in part to opposition from Senator Bob Menendez, who has long advocated against diplomacy with Cuba, Venezuela, and Iran. With a 50-50 Senate, Menendez has the power to sink Biden’s agenda to get his way, and he’s shown a willingness to flex his muscles when he gets a chance.

Regardless of the underlying motivation for the policy, White House officials say the “summit will be successful no matter who attends.” Time will tell if their prediction comes true.

Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador (Shutterstock/Octavio Hoyos)
Analysis | Latin America
Why American war and election news coverage is so rotten
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. | Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. speaking wit… | Flickr

Why American war and election news coverage is so rotten

Media


Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.”

keep readingShow less
Peter Thiel: 'I defer to Israel'

Peter Thiel attends the annual Allen and Co. Sun Valley Media Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, U.S., July 6, 2022. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Peter Thiel: 'I defer to Israel'

QiOSK

The trouble with doing business with Israel — or any foreign government — is you can't really say anything when they do terrible things with technology that you may or may not have sold to them, or hope to sell to them, or hope to sell in your own country.

Such was the case with Peter Thiel, co-founder of Palantir Technologies, in this recently surfaced video, talking to the Cambridge Union back in May. See him stumble and stutter and buy time when asked what he thought about the use of Artificial Intelligence by the Israeli military in a targeting program called "Lavender" — which we now know has been responsible for the deaths of an untold number of innocent Palestinians since Oct 7. (See investigation here).

keep readingShow less
Are budget boosters actually breaking the military?

Committee chairman Jack Reed (D-RI), left, looks on as co-chair Roger Wicker (R-MS) shakes hands with U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin before a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on President Biden's proposed budget request for the Department of Defense on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., April 9, 2024. REUTERS/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades

Are budget boosters actually breaking the military?

Military Industrial Complex

Now that both political parties have seemingly settled upon their respective candidates for the 2024 presidential election, we have an opportune moment to ask a rather fundamental question about our nation’s defense spending: how much is enough?

Back in May, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, penned an op-ed in the New York Times insisting the answer was not enough at all. Wicker claimed that the nation wasn’t prepared for war — or peace, for that matter — that our ships and fighter-jet fleets were “dangerously small” and our military infrastructure “outdated.” So weak our defense establishment and so dangerous the world right now, Wicker pressed, the nation ought to “spend an additional $55 billion on the military in the 2025 fiscal year.”

keep readingShow less

Israel-Gaza Crisis

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.